Catholic Info
Traditional Catholic Faith => The Catholic Bunker => Topic started by: RomanCatholic1953 on June 08, 2011, 08:19:53 AM
-
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1394503/Chile-volcano-causes-ash-cloud-lightning-tears-sky-apart.html
-
Spectacular photos. Thank you for posting, really is a testament to the awesome power that God has, and also the minding-numbing idiocy of global warmers.
-
this picture is amaaazing!!!
(http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/06/06/article-1394503-0C6B7F3F00000578-946_964x563.jpg)
-
... also the minding-numbing idiocy of global warmers.
I don't understand your last bit... what's the relation ?
Very cool pictures !
-
... also the minding-numbing idiocy of global warmers.
I don't understand your last bit... what's the relation ?
Very cool pictures !
You're pretty dense, aren't you?
He means the people like ROMNEY who say that HUMANS are contributing to global warming. The entire industrial revolution could not produce as much CARBON DIOXIDE GAS as that ONE ERUPTION OF THE VOLCANO IN CHILE.
-
He means the people like ROMNEY who say that HUMANS are contributing to global warming. The entire industrial revolution could not produce as much CARBON DIOXIDE GAS as that ONE ERUPTION OF THE VOLCANO IN CHILE.
In fact, if you'd take the time to research you'd find that the yearly release of ALL volcanoes in a year, you still arrive to an insignificant amount compared to the yearly output of human activities.
I'll give you a hint, it's around 130 million tons of CO2 each year for ALL volcanoes, how much do you figure it is for human activity for a year ?
Source: http://volcanoes.usgs.gov/hazards/gas/index.php
-
He means the people like ROMNEY who say that HUMANS are contributing to global warming. The entire industrial revolution could not produce as much CARBON DIOXIDE GAS as that ONE ERUPTION OF THE VOLCANO IN CHILE.
In fact, if you'd take the time to research you'd find that the yearly release of ALL volcanoes in a year, you still arrive to an insignificant amount compared to the yearly output of human activities.
I'll give you a hint, it's around 130 million tons of CO2 each year for ALL volcanoes, how much do you figure it is for human activity for a year ?
Source: http://volcanoes.usgs.gov/hazards/gas/index.php
So then you know that this whole "man made global warming" argument is a scam?
-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_carbon_dioxide_emissions
All volcanoes put together matches the output of a country like the Czech Republic which is less then 0.43% of all human activity only.
Can you please source your outrageous numbers PFT ?
-
So then you know that this whole "man made global warming" argument is a scam?
What it says, is that volcanoes don't add much compared to humans. An insignificant amount as opposed.
-
So then you know that this whole "man made global warming" argument is a scam?
What it says, is that volcanoes don't add much compared to humans. An insignificant amount as opposed.
Forgive me, but didn't you mean just the opposite of what you just said?
"VOLCANOES ADD MORE THAN HUMANS EVER COULD" I think is what you meant to say, right?
-
I suppose you've never heard of the "Year without Summer?" eh?
"Climate abberation"... because of an eruption of Mount Tambora.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Year_Without_Summer
You think if humans were THAT BAD, we would have at least had a repeat episode of that, wouldn't you? Any reasonable person would be able to agree with that.
-
To add it to all the fires in Arizona that are now larger than the
whole city of Phoenix.
-
Forgive me, but didn't you mean just the opposite of what you just said?
"VOLCANOES ADD MORE THAN HUMANS EVER COULD" I think is what you meant to say, right?
It's not what I mean to say, it's what the actual number says.
They say that Volcanoes add very little to what humans do in terms of CO2.
If you think it's otherwise... prove it.
This is why I ask, why are we talking about global warming in this thread.
-
I suppose you've never heard of the "Year without Summer?" eh?
Interesting, thanks, no I had never read about this. However, it has nothing to do with your previous argument which is that based on the false premise that volcanoes produce more CO2 then men.
You think if humans were THAT BAD, we would have at least had a repeat episode of that, wouldn't you? Any reasonable person would be able to agree with that.
I never said that humans were bad.
Secondly, volcanic winters are not based on CO2 emissions but rather in particles of ash which block out the sun.
In other words, your linking to subjects which are unrelated.
__________
In resume, Volcanoes don't add enough CO2 compared to humans to affect the global warming conversation BUT, it can potentially release enough particles in the atmosphere (which is not CO2) to provoke a temporary cooling.
-
I suppose you've never heard of the "Year without Summer?" eh?
Interesting, thanks, no I had never read about this. However, it has nothing to do with your previous argument which is that based on the false premise that volcanoes produce more CO2 then men.
You think if humans were THAT BAD, we would have at least had a repeat episode of that, wouldn't you? Any reasonable person would be able to agree with that.
I never said that humans were bad.
Secondly, volcanic winters are not based on CO2 emissions but rather in particles of ash which block out the sun.
In other words, your linking to subjects which are unrelated.
__________
In resume, Volcanoes don't add enough CO2 compared to humans to affect the global warming conversation BUT, it can potentially release enough particles in the atmosphere (which is not CO2) to provoke a temporary cooling.
So you obviously have proof that CO2 emissions are what is causing global warming? Let's see your stuff.
Forget it, don't waste your time. You're going to pull up some crap publication like "Popular Mechanics" or some "World Wildlife Fund" or "IPCC" report.
Stuff it, Vandeler. (and yes, I spell it that way on PURPOSE.)
-
So you obviously have proof that CO2 emissions are what is causing global warming? Let's see your stuff.
No, that's not what I'm saying. I'm asking... why are we talking about global warming ? You brought up CO2 emissions, not me.
Your telling me stuff it, because you probably realized that your painted yourself into a corner.
-
So you obviously have proof that CO2 emissions are what is causing global warming? Let's see your stuff.
No, that's not what I'm saying. I'm asking... why are we talking about global warming ? You brought up CO2 emissions, not me.
Your telling me stuff it, because you probably realized that your painted yourself into a corner.
No because you always cite the most biased unbelievable sources for your "proof" of things and berate us if we don't accept it.
We were talking about "global warming" because you called out Party because he mentioned it as if he's some loon.
I'm just going to put you back on ignore before I say something uncharitable to you.
-
No because you always cite the most biased unbelievable sources for your "proof" of things and berate us if we don't accept it.
If I quoted sources which are factually wrong, please correct me.
We were talking about "global warming" because you called out Party because he mentioned it as if he's some loon.
I only asked a question... Party should be able to answer it if he feels so strongly about it.