Has anyone here, e.g., taught at a Novus Ordo school and been fired for being a traditional Catholic?

I have heard stories of Novus Ordo schools allowing non-Catholic or -Christian, openly cohabitating, atheist, etc., teachers on their staff, but when they found out they had a SSPX or other traditional Catholic on staff, they fired him.

I think, after a period of time, being in a novus ordo school would be repulsive to the Catholic.

.

This is an important topic.  

I have known others who were fired for this.  And I had a similar
experience, not a "job" but a partnership.  

After all, our Resistance priests are being "fired" from the SSPX
for being too Catholic.  

I have had friends who were "expelled" from Mel Gibson's chapel
in Malibu because they stood up for the Catholic Faith.

I have a friend who was "fired from the pulpit" when the parish
pastor used this person's name and announced the end of my
friend's tenure at the parish right in front of the Sunday
congregation. And that was in 1973.  It was due to my friend's
consistent resistance to the changes in the liturgy, as choir
director.

And now, we see the tug of money interests affecting how our
independent priest adhere to principles.  When some of their more
affluent parishioners are taking sides with Accordistas, that is,
willing to harshly judge +W and blindly defend +F, the independent
pastor might be averse to touching on "political issues" suddenly.
Mind you, this is happening when he has been outspokenly in favor
of touching on "political issues" when it has to do with the Federal
bureaucracy, in regards to the Social Kingship of Our Lord Jesus
Christ.  Maybe the principle of "principles" has two departments?  

We used to call this "duplicity."


I'd call it B16's hermeneutic of double mindedness.  

As a traditional Catholic who will have nothing to do with the new mass or Vatican II, the three diocese in my area would not hire me to teach at their schools.  I could not do it in good conscience because as a lower grade teacher, I'd have to teach the new catechism, bring children to a bastard mass, and sit idly by giving tacit approval by my silence.  How ironic it is that I can teach for a private, non-affiliated "christian" school where the requirements violate neither faith nor morals.  There is basically no difference between the "education" at NYC parochial and public schools.  They both follow the same state/federal mandated No Child Left Behind/Core Standards Curriculum.  Even if permitted, I couldn't teach for either without committing mortal sin.  Catholic parochial schools will hire Protestants, Muslims, Jєωs, people of no religion in the name of ecuмenism.  The only exceptions are traditional Catholics!

I agree with Frances.  She said everything I would have said.  Why, Why on earth would any TRUE traditionalist set foot in a NO school.  They know very darn well that what they would be expected to teach would be lies and half truths and how could they stomach NO mess!  What are they doing in those dioceses!  Stupidity on their part!  Or maybe they are not as traditional as they think they are? Hm?  Is it the money?  The whole idea would make me vomit!
I am reading the book, Public Education my Fr.Muller, wow! written in 1872, what an  eye opener.  

Even if permitted, I couldn't teach for either without committing mortal sin.

What's wrong with the "core" curriculum?

Catholic parochial schools will hire Protestants, Muslims, Jєωs, people of no religion in the name of ecuмenism.  The only exceptions are traditional Catholics!

Yes, that's what I've noticed, too.

I am reading the book, Public Education my Fr.Muller, wow! written in 1872, what an  eye opener.  

Have you read Card. Manning's National Education (1889)?

Kinda off topic, and if it deserves its own thread, I apologize. But, is there really any job anywhere that does not have 6 degrees of separation from immorality and approximate occasion of sin?