There's either going to be nuclear war or a controlled collapse. Without nuclear war, they have to control the collapse in the U.S. because they failed to confiscate the guns here. Without an armed population to hunt them down, they would've collapsed it already to effect their great reset and new financial system. The controlled collapse coincides with the ongoing boiling frog syndrome of White race stupefaction and replacement, and reliance on government to take "care" of themselves. Eventually, the threshold will be met where the White race is so dissolved and the general population is so dumb, domesticated, demoralized and diseased, too few people will have any fight in them to resist the Bankersteins.

There will be nuclear war and/or meltdown of nuclear reactors sometime within this year and 2027. Nuclear war is the only way they rapidly and significantly reduce the global population while minimizing risk of armed revolt against the Bankersteins. They've been building huge underground bunkers for decades and stockpiling food and supplies for themselves. They're telegraphing what they have planned for you and, by contrast, themselves.

Is there a consensus between theolgians, Church fathers, saints, prophecies that Antichrist is coming before or after the Triumph of Immaculate Heart of Mary, Age of Peace aka Regin of Mary?

Has Catholic Church already settled that as a doctrine?

one of the most overlooked items on any prepper list of supplies is a simple, well maintained bicycle with plenty of extra inner tubes and a few spare tires.
Gas might be scarce or unavailable in a SHTF situation, roads might be impassable.
There are a number of places to fish and hunt within a 10 mile radius of me and having a bicycle would make
them much easier to access.
Or
Let's say an EMP goes off and you live or work in a large city. Every highway and road is going to be a parking lot.
If you're in reasonably decent shape you can make it home without too much difficulty.
I remember on 9/11 seeing thousands of people escaping Manhattan on foot over the bridges

Good point about the bicycle.

During times of great trials, whether individual or national, women, generally, succuмb to Stockholm Syndrome in about two days. Women can witness their own husbands and children get brutally murdered in their own presence by their captors, and, in about two days, these same women will be freely pleasuring their captors with enthusiasm just to stay alive or to be part of something powerful.

This article states that less than 8% of people (both male and female) succuмb to Stockholm Syndrome.  https://www.verywellmind.com/stockholm-syndrome-5074944

You really do not have to be so vulgar when you express yourself.

So-called "Stockholm Syndrome" is a jew media construct, because even the psychiatrist who is credited with coining the phrase called it something different, "Norrmalmstorgssyndrome".  It's not a medical diagnosis and doesn't appear in the DSM IV. 

The jew propaganda machine wants us to believe that this is a thing.  As a Catholic, I look to moral theology for guidance.

Total logical fallacy. The DSM IV is a jew publication and compilation of false diagnoses and constructs, yet you argue against the (real) phenomena of Stockholm Syndrome because a jew coined the term. Call it whatever you want, it doesn't matter because the condition still exists.

Truth struck your nerve.

Total logical fallacy. The DSM IV is a jew publication and compilation of false diagnoses and constructs, yet you argue against the (real) phenomena of Stockholm Syndrome because a jew coined the term. Call it whatever you want, it doesn't matter because the condition still exists.

Truth struck your nerve.

You could be right.

Would you please in your charity pray a 54 day rosary novena that I may be enlightened to the Truth?  God bless you.

Let me quote you

That statement is not necessary to make your point.

Ding bat. That isn't vulgar. And there is nothing wrong with being a bull in a china shop when it comes to speaking the truth. Again, you're only perturbed by it because you identify with it. 

Your terms were not innocent either, they were just fluff in hopes of provoking someone.

Fluff?  You're trying to find fault in something that's not there. "Fluffy vulgarity"  
Admit it, woman. Truth cut your nerve like a Buck knife skinning a rabbit.