https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boogaloo_movementSomething about this "boogaloo" movement just doesn't seem quite right. I have a hard time getting my head around a movement (and let me make it clear right up front that I do
NOT endorse what they are doing!) that is fairly explicit about their goals and seeks to draw attention to themselves, through wearing garish Hawaiian shirts in the midst of protest. It seems to me that a true revolutionary or counter-revolutionary group would keep its origins in the shadows, and seek to incite as much chaos and unrest as possible, while staying behind the scenes and not even making their existence known.
I have wondered if "the powers that be" could have concocted this movement, given the impetus for it, and hoped to attract sincere followers, precisely to make the "far-right" look as ridiculous and as sinister as possible. To have a group saying "let's get a cινιℓ ωαr started already" is pretty blatant. Would true revolutionaries behave like that? Or maybe they
want to get a cινιℓ ωαr started, and to be able to blame it on the far-right --- "well, they were the ones who started it, they said as much, we're just responding to the threat with the force we have to use" --- as a way to bring about the secular, anti-Christian, neo-Marxist regime they see themselves as finally being able to create.
Wonder who in the world would ever come up with something like that (cough cough, there goes that nasty cough again, maybe it's the coronavirus...)?The Hawaiian-shirt thing vaguely reminds me of the LaRouche demonstrators I used to see all the time in DC. They looked and acted like bat-guano-crazy, country hick tourists from Middle America, spouting all kinds of craziness --- not a thing sophisticated or intelligent about them. And not endorsing or agreeing with him either, but Lyndon LaRouche himself was a very intelligent-sounding, well-dressed, fairly urbane-looking man.
Topic: Could "boogaloo" have its origins in TPTB? (Read 192 times)