I believe the reason the jew media promotes
These crimes is to sow hatred and to pit one against another. And you are taking the bait.
This is absurd on its very face.
The Jewish media hides
violent crime statistics to further the image of the American negro as the ennobled victim of "White Privilege." In the 1980s, newscasts reported the race of a wanted suspect as part of the general description, and sensibly so, as this aids in alerting the general public to be on their guard. This is no longer done, because reality is deemed "racist." San Francisco's Transit Authority has refused to allow publication of surveillance images taken of crimes committed in the city's trains and buses, again, because it will contribute to "racism." Blacks are 13% of the US population, yet commit roughly 70% of the country's violent crimes. You'll never hear that astonishing statistic reported in the Jewish media, but any and every act of violence committed by a white person against a black person - justified or not - is repeated in the media ad nauseum. Ever hear of Trayvon Martin? Of course you have. The media drove that story into the ground literally for years, helping to stoke the fires of anti-white hatred. Ever hear of Antonio Santiago? Probably not. He was a white infant slaughtered in his stroller in front of his mother by a negro murderer, shortly after the Trayvon Martin incident. Nary a peep from the media.
The media sows hatred, all right - against whites, and against Christians. Not any other racial group, nor any other religious group. You've taken their bait, if anyone has. Hook, line and sinker.
Who brought the drugs into the black neighborhoods, who controls the public schools. Who introduced birth control or abortion.
Like I said before the blacks have been targeted.
Society has changed since the mid 60s and the white race is no different.
Re: birth control / abortion and blacks, I've expressed my viewpoint here: https://www.cathinfo.com/fighting-errors-in-the-modern-world/margaret-sanger-interviewed-by-mike-wallace/msg633399/#msg633399
Human nature has not changed one whit. Each race has its weaknesses and strengths. The Jews are expert at exploiting all of our weaknesses. That redounds to my point. A multicultural society is that much more exposed to potential Jewish exploitation. A unified, racially and religiously and culturally homogenous society is far less at risk.
I'm sure there are plenty of white trash storming Walmart on black Friday.
Blacks are 13% of the nation's population, yet far exceed 13% of the animalistic crowds shown in the posted video.
Yao Ming is a very tall Chinaman. Taller than me, certainly. I'm sure I can find several other Chinamen who are taller than me. Yet "Chinamen are, on average, significantly shorter than white people" remains a true statement. It's not unfair. It's not uncharitable. It's just common sense. Weepy, emotional appeals to false compassion don't change that.
And why do you resort to pejoratives like "white trash?" I didn't call the people in the video "niggers." Do you often throw your own people to the metaphorical wolves to prove how enlightened and charitable you are? Is it wrong to show favor to your own kind? Am I uncharitable for loving my own children more than my neighbor's? Does it follow that "hate" my neighbor's children, simply because I love my own more and put them first? Of course not. Nor should it be with your extended family - your race.
How did the white inhabitants of Europe act before they were given the faith?
Well, some of them produced magnificent works of art and architecture, specifically in Rome and Greece.
They discovered mathematics and developed techniques of medicine and engineering unparalleled for centuries anywhere else in the world.
They developed philosophical schools which laid the groundwork for St. Augustine and St Thomas Aquinas. In fact, I think this is ample evidence that God Almighty providentially established European Civilization (not Africa, not Asia, not the Americas) to receive the Faith and become Christendom - the City set on the Hill.
Even the barbarians among the pre-Christian Europeans were skilled farmers, seafarers and brilliant craftsmen (see the artifacts of the La Tene culture).
In any case, they were nowhere near the pits of savagery that was Sub-Saharan Africa, right up until (and, frequently, including) modern times. Sub-Saharan Africans did not develop any seafaring culture, did not domesticate any of the many beasts God blessed them with, did not write great works of philosophy, did not put their many natural resources to work for them, nor did they invent the wheel, or build any structure beyond a two-story wall, up until encountering Europeans.
Those are simply facts, my deep-feeling, shallow-thinking friend.
And how did the Africans act after the archbishop converted them?
Well, look at Catholic Haiti, which has wavered between bare functionality and out-and-out savagery for more than two centuries since they threw off their French masters. How do they act?
The Sacraments don't raise intelligence any more than they increase height or physical strength. Grace builds on nature, it doesn't transform it.
In the holy hour of reparation it says
Where there Is hatred let me sow love
Where there is injury -,pardon
Multiculturalism and diversity sows little else but hate and injury. Disabusing people of their "colorblind" Pollyanna delusions is an act of Charity. Charity begins at home - your family; your people.
Sorry about the gold teeth comment I didn't know you are so sensitive.
No apology necessary. I have no gold teeth, thus nothing about which to be "sensitive."
For my part, I make no apologies to you. Your post was glibly presumptuous, self-congratulatory, and full of false compassion and treacly appeals to emotion at the far-too-expensive cost of reason.
The last thing we need around here is a Poche 2.0.