Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8

Author Topic: Cathinfo Appreciation  (Read 5978 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Cryptinox

  • Supporter
Re: Cathinfo Appreciation
« Reply #30 on: July 29, 2021, 01:03:09 PM »
Quote from: Matthew on July 29, 2021, 12:07:01 PM
Yes, please do. Take the sede vs. non-sede debate to another thread, in the Crisis subforum.

I actually have to remind myself that RomanTheo is "on my side" as it were -- he's actually annoying ME, even though I'm recognize and resist/Resistance/non-sede.

Apparently being "on my team" is not the be-all and end-all for how I consider members of the forum...
I am not sure if I'd say he is "on your team" I wouldn't call him R&R since he defends Vatican 2. I would say he is an indulter.
Logged

Offline Matthew

  • Mod
Re: Cathinfo Appreciation
« Reply #31 on: July 29, 2021, 01:22:26 PM »
Quote from: Cryptinox on July 29, 2021, 01:03:09 PM
I am not sure if I'd say he is "on your team" I wouldn't call him R&R since he defends Vatican 2. I would say he is an indulter.

If he defends Vatican II, he's certainly not on my team. I don't know him that well. For me, and most Trads, it's "Vatican II must be destroyed." Completely. Leaving absolutely nothing.

I guess insofar as he's anti-sede he's on my team in a VERY BROAD sense -- but that's it.
Logged

Offline 2Vermont

Re: Cathinfo Appreciation
« Reply #32 on: July 29, 2021, 02:27:08 PM »
Quote from: Matthew on July 29, 2021, 01:22:26 PM
If he defends Vatican II, he's certainly not on my team. I don't know him that well. For me, and most Trads, it's "Vatican II must be destroyed." Completely. Leaving absolutely nothing.

I guess insofar as he's anti-sede he's on my team in a VERY BROAD sense -- but that's it.
I'm hoping you meant non-sede rather than anti-sede (given the other comments you made in this thread).  Anti-sede would describe Sean and Meg (ie. the R&R dogmatists) although I would clearly place RomanTheo in the anti-sede category as well...because Siscoe and Salza are a couple of the most rabid anti-sedes out there.  
Logged

Offline Matthew

  • Mod
Re: Cathinfo Appreciation
« Reply #33 on: July 29, 2021, 02:30:13 PM »
Quote from: 2Vermont on July 29, 2021, 02:27:08 PM
I'm hoping you meant non-sede rather than anti-sede (given the other comments you made in this thread).  Anti-sede would describe Sean and Meg for instance (ie. the R&R dogmatists).

Yeah that's a good distinction. I should have said "non-sede".

When I wrote the above, I considered non- and anti- to be equivalent. And in some way they are. But now that I think about it, "anti-sede" sounds more adversarial, or "on the warpath".

I guess it's a question of actual definition vs. connotation.
Logged

Offline FlosCarmeli13

Re: Cathinfo Appreciation
« Reply #34 on: July 29, 2021, 08:47:05 PM »
To get back to the OP,  I add my appreciation to Matthew for creating and maintaining CathInfo, while being a busy husband and father of 9 children.  I have been a longtime (on-and-off) reader.  This site is different from other Trad sites.

Thank you, Matthew
May God bless you, your family and CI!
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8
« previous next »