quote
" believe that literally, from one day to the next, everything could completely change."

===================================

   When people wake up and see the betrayal of Assisi 1986 and how no credible resistance was established (sorry SSPX - nice try) , people are going to start running for the nearest exit and they won't come back. It is not in the nature of good people to hang around the Satanic fruits of Club Infallible. A Billion people and what kind of leadership do you have to show for it ? Like Hoffman said, only one bishop to denounce the replacement of calvary with Auschwitz ?  This total catastrophic failure is already in proportion to the 8 survivors of Noah's ark out of the whole world.

   Hey its long past bull whip time to get nasty. Obedience to Satanism is no virtue.

Quote

"I believe that literally, from one day to the next, everything could completely change.  I don't know where I get this optimism"

=================================

   Another examploe of irrational exuberance .  This following looks like the real deal.

http://www.traditio.com/comment/com1004.htm

Is Benedict-Ratzinger the Alexander VI of the 21st Century?
That "Bad" Pope's Corruption Ushered in the Protestant Revolution
From: The Fathers

It is a scandal all of its own the degree to which Newchurch officials -- and an embarrassing number of pseudo-"traditionalists" -- try to defend the man who claims to be the "Holy Father" and actively plots to have his spiritual children raped and sɛҳuąƖly assaulted in the tens of thousands. Even some periodicals that claim to be "traditionalist" have changed their tune and become sycophantic in favor of this pope of the Novus Ordo, which they had previously criticized.

According to one account, Newchurch's Great Sex & Embezzlement h0Ɩ0cαųst has been "orchestrated" by enemies of the Newchurch pope, who resent his opposition to abortion and same-sex marriage. Nonsense! First of all, Benedict-Ratzinger is not so opposed to abortion and same-sex marriage. He regularly receives pro-abortion advocates, like the U.S.'s Barack Obama and Nancy Peℓσѕι, with great enthusiasm. He has not interdicted or excommunicated a single politician, of any country, for public supporting abortion and the public funding thereof. As far as "gαy marriage" is concerned, Benedict-Ratzinger broke with traditional Catholicism by issuing an edict that ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs should be admitted to Novus Ordo seminaries if they hadn't been actively sodomizing for a period of three years. Is "gαy marriage" far behind for Newchurch?

But the real point is that no one had to "orchestrate" anything. Newchurch's sex-crimes h0Ɩ0cαųst has been demonstrated as a fact now beyond any doubt, and the Church leader responsible for it more than any other is Ratzinger, later Benedict. It has now been proven that he was complicit as Newarchbishop of Munich, Germany, between 1977 and 1981. Then, he became jointly responsible for Newchurch's sex crimes as Prefect of the Newchurch Doctrine of the Faith Congregation in 1981. Subsequently, he became solely responsible for Newchurch's sex crimes in 2001, when he was appointed Sex-crimes Czar by JPII, and then Monarch of Sex Crimes in 2005 when he became Newpope.

Ratzinger's record is now public knowledge and is becoming clearer and clearer by new revelations every day. He had a policy of pandering to the Newchurch criminals, like the presbyter who raped 200 deaf children, whose trial he ordered stopped, or the Oakland, California, presbyter who was a convicted sex criminal and was, with Ratzinger's knowledge, kept in the presbyterate and posted as a youth minister at a Newchurch parish.

In every case that has come to light, Ratzinger sided not with the child-victims, but with the criminal presbyters. Nor did Ratzinger lift a finger to defrock these criminal presbyters to protect future children. It is a fact, now beyond dispute, that Ratzinger has been the moving party since 1981 in retaining sex criminals in their Newchurch posts. His excuse? He didn't want scandal Well, now he's got scandal aplenty because of his subornation of the vilest of Newchurch clergy. As the saying goes, the buck stops with him. Didn't he himself state that this type of behavior was "indefensible"? Yet he and his Newchurch mouthpieces continue to defend his indefensible behavior.

It is looking more and more as if Benedict-Ratzinger is the 21st century's own Alexander VI, the "Bad" Pope, who at his death in 1503, because of the thorough corruption of his papacy, trigged the Protestant Revolution. Even Catholic Saints like Thomas More and Venerables like Erasmus, railed against the papal corruption that the Church had to endure. It was then easy for Martin Luther to tap into the Catholic world's revulsion against the pope, and half of Europe was lost to the Protestant heresy and never came back.

With his corrupt doctrine and morals, Benedict-Ratzinger may well be triggering, before our very eyes, the final destruction of his Newchurch of the New Order. One can only hope that there will be a revolution in the Church, which may have the result of expelling the invalid Novus Ordo service and the "Motu" Mess Hoax, as well as the vile moral corruptions of the Newchurch clergy. God willing, at least some breath of traditional Catholicism might be restored as a result.

==========

Alexander VI (1492-1503), Known as the "Bad Pope"
Alexander Was So Bad that Even Catholic Saints like Thomas More
Denounced the Corruption of the Church under His Papacy
The Catholic World Was So Offended by This Pope's Immorality
That Half of Europe Was Lost to Catholicism in the Protestant Revolution of 1517