CathInfo.com

I'm very interested in (what are now being called) intentional communities. I'm somewhat involved in one myself. I think they are one of the surest ways to provide the proper social (and hopefully economic and political) environment in which our children can not just survive but flourish. 

But practical problems abound. 

Who purchases all the land necessary for the village? Where is it? Presumably one would need to purchase agriculturally zoned land, but agriculturally zoned land has significant restrictions for population density, which will make it very difficult to build a village-- neighbors are going to have to be a 10-15 minute drive from each other; the chapel too, etc.

I'm sure there are probably some places where such restrictions don't exist. Zoning laws are local after all. Just pointing out that this is a problem which poses restrictions on where you do this. 

Not to mention the problem of financing it. If it's all granted or purchased by one person (more likely than it being purchased by a group of people), that person needs to be exceptionally moral to prevent him from becoming a tyrant or cult leader. 

There is also the question of culture and economics. Everyone talks a big game until it's time to actually pack up, move to the middle of nowhere, give up the amenities of the big cities, and eek out an existence in subsidiarity. Family men need job security. If they don't have homesteading skills, what assurances are there that their neighbors will be both proficient and charitable enough to instruct and carry them? If it's a remote location what assurances are there that if it fails the man can work a living doing something else? Most people know they do not have the skill set--nevermind the courage -- to get in on the ground floor of a project like this. 

Your best bet is to build such a community with choleric, industrious young men who've not yet set down roots, who've learned some trades already, and maybe even have some capitol to risk. 

But where do the women come from? Will women be persuaded to pair up with these young men, who (from a typical female perspective) have built something anti-social and insular?

Haven't even started in with the problems of forming an independent chapel. 

I think a more practical way to get started with projects like this is to seize existing, decaying civic infrastructure. Move to an already existent small town in a rural area where property is relatively cheap and the population is aging. Learn or be ready to learn construction skills so you can take advantage of abandoned properties for cheap. Make strategic connections to acquire political and economic power in these places, which can then be passed on through custom and inheritance. Be within an hour or a metropolitan area so people have a way to work if they can't make their own labor work for them. 

The barriers to entry are much lower and less expensive. There are more fail-safes for those who are motivated but who prudently need to keep their options open. 

I like the concept, as I've proposed this before, where there's so much waste in the typical suburban model.  Everybody on my street has a lawn mower that sits in the garage for all but 1-2 hours per week on average ... why can't you have a central barn/storage area where people could borrow it from and take it back (signing up on a schedule)?

I just think that the picture of a cathedral in the middle of 5 houses simply does not scale.  You simply can't support the cost, both building cost and maintenance cost of such a thing without much more population around it.

Perhaps if you put a bunch of those plots in a flower-petal design around the central church, then you might be talking.