Catholic Info
Traditional Catholic Faith => Funny Stuff for Catholics => Topic started by: spouse of Jesus on August 25, 2009, 02:08:03 AM
-
And what name would you choose?
-
We will have to wait for the two witnesses to straighten things out. There is no hope for Club Infallible.
============================================
Offer an apology to Bishop Strossmayer. He recognized that the Vatican Council was a curse.
Restore the Church to 1850 , before Pope Pius IX.
Restore original Liturgy of 1850
Re-establish all things in Christ. One faith, one fold.
=========================================
Not an endorsemen - FYI
Looks like you have to wait in line for this gig.
THe Pope Michael Docuмentary
http://www.popemichaelfilm.com/
http://www.betrayedcatholics.com/
-
And what name would you choose?
Make SSPX personal prelature or some way for them to be left alone and have their own bishops.
Talk to trusted advisors how to exit the NO Mass
Clean house with heretics-get rid of them, not move them around!
Pope Athanasius
-
This is actually a very difficult question. Naturally every single person here would wish to make their first priority to restore all things in Christ. But, how does one go about changing 50 years and several generations of corruption? How does one free himself of the influence of the masons, or the Communists, or whatnot? How does one free the vatican? A billion souls are influenced here. Whoever would be pope would probably have to dispell almost every single cardinal out of the vatican and replace them with new ones. And then a general council will have to be called. That is.......if the masons allow it. The pope will need all the rosaries he can get to root out the puppeteers if he is to make such a brave move to restore the church to Rome.
-
The pope will need all the rosaries he can get to root out the puppeteers if he is to make such a brave move to restore the church to Rome.
:applause: :incense:
-
I would choose the name Peter II. Sure prots would be outeraged!
Then I would restore catholic modesty and respect for the religious life. Great anathemas and excuмminaction would come from my lips for : feminists
immodest persons
liberals
Child abusers
Polygamists
Many people would be de-canonized.
-
Issue a Papal Bull, cuм Nimis Absurdum, making Vatican II anathema. I would then correct many of the errors and heresies of the past couple of centuries by reinstating what past Popes have said and then some, repeating them ex cathedra. As a result I would probably have to formally excommunicate about 98% of the hierarchy and possible even the same for the laity. I would appoint the SSPX bishops as Cardinals, and their priests as Bishops. I would do away with the current Jesuits and as establish the SSPX as a new type of Jesuit. I would later move to condemn the NWO and modern society and culture as we know it. If any problems remained I would open Trent II, Florence II, or Constance II.
-
I would take the name Sixtus VI, though some may think that I'm the anti-Christ if I take that name.
-
Issue a Papal Bull, cuм Nimis Absurdum, making Vatican II anathema. I would then correct many of the errors and heresies of the past couple of centuries by reinstating what past Popes have said and then some, repeating them ex cathedra. As a result I would probably have to formally excommunicate about 98% of the hierarchy and possible even the same for the laity. I would appoint the SSPX bishops as Cardinals, and their priests as Bishops.
That is being hasty and short-sighted. Although elevating the FSSPX bishops to the College of Cardinals would be a good move, elevating many, if not all, of their priests to the episcopacy is extremely unwise and almost tantamount to an abuse of power. Not every single FSSPX priest has the qualities of a bishop.
I would do away with the current Jesuits and as establish the SSPX as a new type of Jesuit. I would later move to condemn the NWO and modern society and culture as we know it. If any problems remained I would open Trent II, Florence II, or Constance II.
Why not just cleanse the Jesuit order?
-
oh I can just HEAR the knives scraping the and the guns loading.
-
Issue a Papal Bull, cuм Nimis Absurdum, making Vatican II anathema. I would then correct many of the errors and heresies of the past couple of centuries by reinstating what past Popes have said and then some, repeating them ex cathedra. As a result I would probably have to formally excommunicate about 98% of the hierarchy and possible even the same for the laity. I would appoint the SSPX bishops as Cardinals, and their priests as Bishops.
That is being hasty and short-sighted. Although elevating the FSSPX bishops to the College of Cardinals would be a good move, elevating many, if not all, of their priests to the episcopacy is extremely unwise and almost tantamount to an abuse of power. Not every single FSSPX priest has the qualities of a bishop.
I didn't say I would appoint all of their priests. Technically many of the bishops that are appointed today don't meet the qualities of a bishop.
I would do away with the current Jesuits and as establish the SSPX as a new type of Jesuit. I would later move to condemn the NWO and modern society and culture as we know it. If any problems remained I would open Trent II, Florence II, or Constance II.
Why not just cleanse the Jesuit order?
Or cleanse the Jesuit order with SSPX priests. Either way the result is the same. The modern Jesuits as we know them are for the most part beyond repair. There is also something strange to fact that many Jesuits throughout history have a tendency to fall into liberalism. (Think 18th and 20th centuries)
-
there will be norvus ordo priests that will eventually realize their error. There will have to be a lot of reschooling when it comes to theology and a lot of restructuring of Catholic schools. It will require enormous sums of money, so a means in which to attain this will probably need to be implemented.
-
I would choose the name Peter II.
That's the exact title I was going to choose!
-
Let's see.... I would choose the name Benedict XVII, and (naturally) do away with the NO by re-educating what priests and bishops who are truely loyal to the Papacy in the Tridentine rite, and excommunicate any who refuse to co-operate. I would consecrate Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary (as would be my duty to God and man), crown Sixto Enrique of Bourbon the Holy Roman Emperor and excommunicate Queen Sophia and her husband and the Hapsburgs, declare VII illigitimate, do away with all ecuмenism, make the instruction of the Baltimore and Trent catechisms mandatory for all catechists, forbid mixed religious marriages, bring back the Index of Forbidden Books (with a complementary list for movies and music... I dont care if it's going to be super long, thats why we will have a website for it with a search engine! ). I can sit here forever naming the important people who should be excommunicated so I'll move on... I would encourage the study of traditional cultures (according to ones ethnicity), Catholic art, chivalry, monarchy, distributism, agrarianism, and women to wear dresses instead of pants. :smile: Also I would release the 3rd Secret of Fatima as Our Lady asked. And most of all...
... I would pray to God and all the saints and beg of the faithful to pray for me so that I would have the courage and strength to do it all! :faint:
-
I would be Pope Pius XIII. After I hire a couple of private body guards and food testers, I will declare Vatican II null and void, abolish the NO, excommunicate most of the Cardinals, Bishops, and Priests. Then Make the four SSPX bishops cardinals. Reveal the Third Secret and consecrate Russia.
-
Let's see.... I would choose the name Benedict XVII, and (naturally) do away with the NO by re-educating what priests and bishops who are truely loyal to the Papacy in the Tridentine rite, and excommunicate any who refuse to co-operate. I would consecrate Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary (as would be my duty to God and man), crown Sixto Enrique of Bourbon the Holy Roman Emperor and excommunicate Queen Sophia and her husband and the Hapsburgs, declare VII illigitimate, do away with all ecuмenism, make the instruction of the Baltimore and Trent catechisms mandatory for all catechists, forbid mixed religious marriages, bring back the Index of Forbidden Books (with a complementary list for movies and music... I dont care if it's going to be super long, thats why we will have a website for it with a search engine! ). I can sit here forever naming the important people who should be excommunicated so I'll move on... I would encourage the study of traditional cultures (according to ones ethnicity), Catholic art, chivalry, monarchy, distributism, agrarianism, and women to wear dresses instead of pants. :smile: Also I would release the 3rd Secret of Fatima as Our Lady asked. And most of all...
... I would pray to God and all the saints and beg of the faithful to pray for me so that I would have the courage and strength to do it all! :faint:
:applause: :light-saber: Bonsai!!!!!!
-
Do not forget the twelve million rosaries too! You will need them.
-
All the answers are good except for making the SSPX bishops into cardinals. I would make my cardinals out of those who left SSPX for the sedevacantist position, and who have proven themselves through tough personal decisions that cost them their comfort and livelihoods within the ( in my opinion ) controlled opposition of FSSPX. I know who my Merry del Val would be already, and he is an obscure FSSPX-turned-sedevacantist priest who has proven his love of truth and rejection of all worldly honors.
The SSPX are also liars who want you to know VII is bad, but not just HOW bad it is. "Thus the SSPX refuses to 'accept the Council' for reasons that go way beyond a subjective preference for a particular form of liturgical expression. While acknowledging that there are no explicit denials of traditional doctrines in the Council docuмents..." What?! Saying "Together with us, Muslims worship the one true God" in Lumen Gentium is not an explicit denial of THE FIRST COMMANDMENT, and in a "dogmatic constitution" no less? Okay. Next... They have kept people frozen in place long enough. These are not the kind of watchdogs I'd need to protect the restored Church. And wanting the Tridentine Mass to be the only Mass offered in the Latin Church is not "subjective" but very objective; it objectively IS the Mass of the Church.
Bishop Fellay would be brought before a tribunal and made to account for his (in)actions. Unless he could absolve himself, he would have NO place within the Church, as I consider him about as trustworthy as Ratzinger, with his constantly aggrieved act: "Why are they so mean to us? We want to obey." Uh -- they're HERETICS, pal! That's like freeing a murderer from prison and then wondering why you get shivved in the back for your pocket change.
I would also ask FSSPX for all records of these so-called "dialogues" they have with Rome but that we rarely hear about in detail. The whole "dialogue" fiasco is like a badly-written play that has no internal logic, since FSSPX complains about Vatican II, but then when it comes to "dialogues" are always put on the defensive and in the position of the jilted lover. Notice how they have gotten their constituents to REJOICE at the prospect of "excommunications" being lifted when the same constituents should simply not care who a false Church excommunicates. This is not a healthy or Christ-like love of humiliation; it is like Athanasius grovelling at the feet of Arius. FSSPX have gotten people to wish for the wrong thing, to consider the wrong man as Pope, and to consider the wrong church as the Church.
Because of this unconscionable procedure of bowing and scraping to Modernists, I'd excommunicate them all as heretics who denied the dogmas of infallibility and indefectibility, unless they repented. I'd also set up an investigatory commission to determine if FSSPX are deliberate deceivers, as I suspect they are. So a lot of my papacy would be driven by retroactive wrath at FSSPX, you might say, because I smell a rat.
Better make the more level-headed Catholic Samurai the Pope, then, unless he is pro-SSPX at that time! His answer is the best, especially this part: "I would encourage the study of traditional cultures (according to ones ethnicity), Catholic art, chivalry, monarchy, distributism, agrarianism, and women to wear dresses instead of pants." Perfect, except for the part about the traditional cultures... That sounds mildly pagan, like the Spanish teaching the Aztecs to more closely study being Aztec, when they should fully embrace their new Catholic way of life. That is like a drop of poison that could lead to Indians wearing feathered headdresses in Church, saying it is their indigenous right, etc. And then we are right back where we started.
Also, I am gratified by the nod to Spanish royalty, but Prince Sixtus Henry is not the leader we need. He is about as close as we have on Earth at the moment but I am turned off by his support of Le Pen. I don't like royals, like Otto von Habsburg, who have to stay involved in politics even when it becomes democratic. They should prove themselves by taking ordinary jobs, refusing to have anything to do with the filth of ʝʊdɛօ-Masonic democracy.
If we are to have a king or Great Monarch, God may test him first, to see if he can stomach humiliation and obscurity. Some of the prophecies say this. After this trial by fire, he will have proven his worth to restore Europe. No one who is an enemy of the Cross, and a lover of comfort and power for its own sake, should have a high place in the restored Church.
-
I take that back about my "wrath" against the FSSPX. I'm totally unemotional on the subject and I don't even have a history with them. I am just amazed no one sees what to me is so evident, that there's the impression of calculation and stalling and evasion in their policies, as well as many false premises, such as that it is a desideratum to be integrated into a heretical sect calling itself the Catholic Church.
-
I take that back about my "wrath" against the FSSPX. I'm totally unemotional on the subject
Yikes, if th previous post to the one quoted is "unemotional", hate to see you when you blow your top! Still trying to get singe out of eyebrows on last post.... :surprised: