Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: SUSANVACANTISM: The Spiritual Dangers  (Read 12621 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline MiracleOfTheSun

Re: SUSANVACANTISM: The Spiritual Dangers
« Reply #5 on: July 22, 2024, 04:13:54 PM »
May Pope St. Susan the Great the First be forever in our happy memories - and be on the watch for pesky Susan-deniers who do nothing but get under your skin.  
Logged

Offline Meg

Re: SUSANVACANTISM: The Spiritual Dangers
« Reply #6 on: July 22, 2024, 04:38:59 PM »
Quote from: Comrade on July 22, 2024, 02:32:48 PM
They are comparing the primary disqualifier attribute of the Pope Susan, a woman,  to the primary disqualifier of Francis, his manifest formal heresy. Just replace Susan with Francis and replace woman with manifest heretic. It is the same narrative, the same arguments that someone like Michael Matt would make.

Okay, thanks. But it seems that the only viable option in the article, even looking at it through satire, is that Pope Susan is not the Pope. But we know that the author of the piece is not a sedevacantist [Mr. Wright], so it's a bit confusing, if you see what I mean. I may not be reading it right. 
Logged

Offline Yeti

  • Supporter
Re: SUSANVACANTISM: The Spiritual Dangers
« Reply #7 on: July 22, 2024, 05:52:35 PM »
Quote from: Meg on July 22, 2024, 04:38:59 PM
But we know that the author of the piece is not a sedevacantist [Mr. Wright]
.

Um, I think he is. :confused:
Logged

Offline Meg

Re: SUSANVACANTISM: The Spiritual Dangers
« Reply #8 on: July 22, 2024, 06:05:39 PM »
Quote from: Yeti on July 22, 2024, 05:52:35 PM
.

Um, I think he is. :confused:

Now that you mention it, maybe he isn't. If not, it would just be an odd coincidence. :smirk:
Logged

Offline MiserereMei

  • Supporter
Re: SUSANVACANTISM: The Spiritual Dangers
« Reply #9 on: July 22, 2024, 06:33:44 PM »
This shows in the webpage about the satire:
Disclaimer – The following article is satire. Satire, of its nature, can be biting – but it's intended with the best wishes towards those satirised. I hope that it may make our position clearer to those who do not understand it; and may make the objects of the satire re-evaluate their own positions.

This article was originally published for us at [color=var(--print_pop)]Crisis in the Church[/iurl] without attribution. I have lightly updated it.[/i][/font][/size][/color]
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]
« previous next »