Can you explain its meaning?
Refer to this video:
And this thread: https://www.cathinfo.com/health-and-nutrition/cure-type-2-diabetes-with-sugar-white-rice-dr-mcdougall/
Pax Vobis says:
He listened to a health video where the Dr said that 'sugar' can cure diabetes and he has taken this 1 statement literally, and to the extreme, (without distinguishing between complex carbs and table sugar) to mean that we should all overload on sugar (no matter what type) and this is the better than overindulging in proteins/oils.
This is partly incorrect. I know the difference between complex carbs (pasta, etc.) and simple sugar (refined, table sugar). I also emphasized a diet in carbohydrate, which includes simple sugars like refined sugar. Also, the medical journals cited in the above video reveal that refined sugar cures Type 2 Diabetes and increases insulin sensitivity. What's wrong with taking the truth "to the extreme"? Is that supposed to be an ad hominem?
Full sugar brah is a twist offshoot from the dopers athletic slang saying "full natty brah". It is said by one who says they are not using performance enhancing drugs, but they are. They use slang to lighten the mood you could say about a negative subject(lying and PED's). It turns a serious subject like lying about/and using PED's into comedy(so they think) if you catch them in their lie. The translation is, I am all(full) natural(natty) brother(brah).
I recommended a couple of weeks ago that croix change his name to "sucker". Because, the word sucker is a derogatory word for one who eats a lot of simple sugars. Simple sugars are slave food. Sucker!
In this context, and keeping with its slang use, it means that croix consumes one a lot of refined sugar, and two believes refined sugar is the key to a healthy successful existence here on planet earth.
I'm full sugar and full natty, brah.
Seriously. I've never doped, and I like the sugar. Your narrative about dopers and the slang is blanket statement. In fact, how do you quantify the percentage of actual dopers who say they're "full natty"? You're simply forming a narrative in the form of an ad hominem that is untrue in many cases.
You're also jelly over my fluctuating, yet lean, 5% to 10% body fat, musculature & easy hypertrophy, and physical prowess, despite my high consumption of carbohydrates, including simple sugars with no inhibition.
On a side note, I've even snorted pure cane powdered sugar on occasion. No, that's not a metaphor for the drug cocaine. I actually snort pure cane powdered sugar every "blue moon". It really gets the body energized. That stuff will make you sweat, brah.