[ServusSpiritusSancti]

I also don't understand why all of this dirt is being brought up from years ago against a few of us.  It's not like Mith didn't post things on FE a few years ago that Ben/Hatch/Guitarplucker and SSS wouldn't find Modernist and feminist.

And yet there's silence on that.

Did you read what Mith wrote?

He said he wasn't Traditional when he first joined FE but he's changed.

I've said the same thing numerous times and yet you keep bringing up what I've said on FE years ago, what Penelope said on FE years ago, etc.

I don't even post on FE anymore and haven't for months yet we're still talking about it.

I haven't said anything about your posts on FE. I just said that you're a supporter of Bishop Fellay.

[Walty]

I guess I should have aimed that more at Ben/Hatch/Guitarplucker.  My apologies.

[Mithrandylan]

Mith, I'm curious as to why you're posting on SD that it's ok to say grace with Protestants all the while you're saying here that we shouldn't be too close to heretics.

That seems inconsistent.

http://www.s.com/forum/index.php?topic=2561.0

Quote what I said that is a problem.

[Mithrandylan]

I also don't understand why all of this dirt is being brought up from years ago against a few of us.  It's not like Mith didn't post things on FE a few years ago that Ben/Hatch/Guitarplucker and SSS wouldn't find Modernist and feminist.

And yet there's silence on that.

Did you read what Mith wrote?

He said he wasn't Traditional when he first joined FE but he's changed.

I've also made several threads recanting any and all error for the shameful things I've said.  Here, and on FE.

I have my signatures ending with a blanket condemnation of any and all liberalism (etc.) that I've held to.

I have a lot to be ashamed of.  

[Walty]

Mith, I'm curious as to why you're posting on SD that it's ok to say grace with Protestants all the while you're saying here that we shouldn't be too close to heretics.

That seems inconsistent.

http://www.s.com/forum/index.php?topic=2561.0

Quote what I said that is a problem.

I'm not saying it's problematic, but it seems inconsistent.  I'm supposed to rebuke KK publicly and cut off ties with him because he mistreated Tele but it's no big deal to be friends, dine, and pray with Protestants.

If they outnumber us, and we are their guests, we make the sign of the cross as they begin and say a Catholic blessing silently.

Isn't that being silent to error?  What if they got the idea that you were praying with them because of your silence?

I've told KK I disagree with things he does to his face but that's not good enough and yet the above is ok?

[Jaynek]

I've also made several threads recanting any and all error for the shameful things I've said.  Here, and on FE.

I have my signatures ending with a blanket condemnation of any and all liberalism (etc.) that I've held to.

I have a lot to be ashamed of.  

Is that why your tone seems so harsh sometimes?  Is it because you are ashamed and angry with yourself for what you did in the past?

[Hatchc]

I also don't understand why all of this dirt is being brought up from years ago against a few of us.  It's not like Mith didn't post things on FE a few years ago that Ben/Hatch/Guitarplucker and SSS wouldn't find Modernist and feminist.

And yet there's silence on that.

It seems he's changing his mind about a lot. You don't exhibit those tendencies.

And you didn't address the erinisnice question.

And yes I was guitarplucker. I have personal reasons for not using the same account again. And since I didn't form any personal relationships or pms with anyone under that account I don't feel all that bad about it. If Matthew bans me for breaking a rule then so be it. I've actually been here before guitarplucker, too. I don't feel bad about that either.

erinisnice has had multiple accounts here. You should answer my question about her.

[Hatchc]

I also don't understand why all of this dirt is being brought up from years ago against a few of us.  It's not like Mith didn't post things on FE a few years ago that Ben/Hatch/Guitarplucker and SSS wouldn't find Modernist and feminist.

And yet there's silence on that.

Because it's still relevant. You've got the same stripes.

[Walty]

I also don't understand why all of this dirt is being brought up from years ago against a few of us.  It's not like Mith didn't post things on FE a few years ago that Ben/Hatch/Guitarplucker and SSS wouldn't find Modernist and feminist.

And yet there's silence on that.

It seems he's changing his mind about a lot. You don't exhibit those tendencies.

And you didn't address the erinisnice question.

And yes I was guitarplucker. I have personal reasons for not using the same account again. And since I didn't form any personal relationships or pms with anyone under that account I don't feel all that bad about it. If Matthew bans me for breaking a rule then so be it. I've actually been here before guitarplucker, too. I don't feel bad about that either.

erinisnice has had multiple accounts here. You should answer my question about her.

What's your question about her?  I think she says things which are not Catholic in any way and I think she often posts in totally uncharitable ways.

She knows I think this.  I disagree with her publicly.  If you want me to say more than that (aka, take pot shots at her personally) I won't do it.  I don't dislike her at all, and I don't think she deserves to be treated as if I do.

Disagreements don't have to be personal.  I've disagreed with many different posters over the years and few of those disagreements have fostered any actual ill feelings, at least not on my end.

[Hatchc]

Speaking of erinsinice, why doesn't Walty find it problematic that an admitted feminist is tolerated on his forum? Kaesekopf has the biggest crush, I don't think I'm revealing any big secret. It's not like she's new, and should be given some breathing room so that she can learn that she's wrong about some things. She's been on these forums for years entertaining us with her one-liners and feminist BS. If she was going to change her stripes she already would have.

[Walty]

I also think that it's deceptive to use multiple accounts, especially if it is against forum rules.

Why grill me about being deceptive and sleazy all the while you're being dishonest yourself?  Why use different accounts?  Why can't you say everything you want to say as yourself?

[Hatchc]

Personal reasons. But not to be devious. As long as Matthew doesn't see me posting error I hope he will let me stay.

You still haven't addressed why you don't object to erinisnice posting over there. She does spread error.

You like her and therefore you really don't mind her feminist BS.

[Walty]

Personal reasons. But not to be devious. As long as Matthew doesn't see me posting error I hope he will let me stay.

You still haven't addressed why you don't object to erinisnice posting over there. She does spread error.

You like her and therefore you really don't mind her feminist BS.

I greatly mind when she posts erroneous things.  And I challenge her when I see her doing so.  I speak up when she breaks forum rules, and she's been temporarily banned before for doing so.

It's not about liking or disliking anyone.  I don't know Erin well enough to speak to that. It's about the content of what one posts, much of which I disagree with when it comes to Erin.

[Mithrandylan]

I'm not saying it's problematic, but it seems inconsistent.  I'm supposed to rebuke KK publicly and cut off ties with him because he mistreated Tele but it's no big deal to be friends, dine, and pray with Protestants.

Catholics are supposed to stand up for the Truth.  No need to personalize it.  

As to being 'friends with' dining' and 'praying' with protestants, that is just a gross mischaracterization of what I've said, so gross and so misconstrued that it sounds imaginary.  The question was asked, when you're eating with protestants, do you pray with them.  I said that I don't, and I then said what I do.

In case you were wondering, the only time I'm ever around protestants in that context is when I'm with in-laws.

Isn't that being silent to error?  What if they got the idea that you were praying with them because of your silence?

Trust me, it would be very difficult for them to get that idea.

I've told KK I disagree with things he does to his face but that's not good enough and yet the above is ok?

As I said, 'the above' is imaginary.

[Mithrandylan]

I've also made several threads recanting any and all error for the shameful things I've said.  Here, and on FE.

I have my signatures ending with a blanket condemnation of any and all liberalism (etc.) that I've held to.

I have a lot to be ashamed of.  

Is that why your tone seems so harsh sometimes?  Is it because you are ashamed and angry with yourself for what you did in the past?

That's it Freud.  And when I was five, I didn't get a power ranger action figure that I really wanted.  Messed me up big time.