Quote from: Walty

Quote from: Mithrandylan

Will you have a five second delay so that you can go *beeep* anytime someone says neo-sspx?  

You're still hung up on that?

Yeah, well, it's sort of like AQ censoring the word "sedevacantist" all those years. It's really childish.

The fact that SD doesn't allow the term "Neo-SSPX" indicates that the forum isn't as pro-Williamson as you all try to portray it.

It's not as pro-Williamson as you'd like it to be, no.  That's not really a secret.  Of course, that gets spun into some nonsense about the forum disliking +Williamson, which also isn't the case.

Quote from: Mithrandylan

Quote from: Walty

Quote from: Mithrandylan

Will you have a five second delay so that you can go *beeep* anytime someone says neo-sspx?  

You're still hung up on that?

No, just pointing out that your audience and content is going to be fairly predetermined considering that you won't touch what is the most significant series of news events in the traditional Catholic world (the betrayal of the neo-sspx).  

Won't touch those events or haven't agreed with you about those events?  We've had more than one thread on the topic with varying opinions.  You didn't get warned because you disagreed with +Fellay or were pro +Williamson.  In fact, you didn't even get warned for saying that the SSPX had dropped the ball and were no longer fulfilling the vision of +Lefebvre.  You got warned for using a name for the Society that we thought impaired rather than strengthened the discussion.  You make it out to be as if we asked you to do something immoral or to compromise your beliefs, but that wasn't the case at all.

None of the staff have touched it (it is the staff who are running the radio show, is it not?).  Never when they had their own questions satisfied, or when they were asked questions directly.  

You didn't warn me for pointing out that Fellay is dropping the ball-- nor did you warn the resident feminist for being a feminist or the resident liberals for being resident liberals.  SD is very tolerant.  That is not news to me.

I'm not really sure what your point is, so I'm not going to give you a thesis or anything.  Except that it is well known and discernible that your staff has shown little to no interest in the destruction of the SSPX, the largest and most successful traditional fraternity in the world.  With the exception of Bonaventure acknowledging the betrayal re: the AFD, the Catholic Resistance is met with dissent-- and not just by users.  

I don't understand why you guys are arguing?

I go to a FSSP parish. Archbishop Lefebvre and Bishop Williamson are heroes of mine. I respect but don't believe the sede position. I can understand the resistance. I like the SSPX point of view.

I frankly don't see how arguing about minutae is going to further the cause?

On the other hand, it makes for entertaining and educational reading. So carry on.

Won't touch those events or haven't agreed with you about those events?  We've had more than one thread on the topic with varying opinions.  You didn't get warned because you disagreed with +Fellay or were pro +Williamson.  In fact, you didn't even get warned for saying that the SSPX had dropped the ball and were no longer fulfilling the vision of +Lefebvre.  You got warned for using a name for the Society that we thought impaired rather than strengthened the discussion.  You make it out to be as if we asked you to do something immoral or to compromise your beliefs, but that wasn't the case at all.

This was a great post, Walty.  I tried to give it a thumbs up but for some reason it did not work.

Hey Jaynek, I tried to give your post a thumbs down,. Fortunately it worked.