Alex said:

The sedes may have it all wrong, but I wouldn't say they are not Catholic. They believe in all the truths of the Catholic Church, including the papacy. It is not their fault that they are led astray and believe there is no current Pope.

If we are wrong, we are in trouble.  If these are Popes, and we don't submit to them, then we are out of the Church, we refuse submission to the rightful Pontiff.  I can't imagine God would be pleased about that.

It's not just their actions that make me believe they aren't Popes but that they actually have taught heresies from the Magisterium.  Actually, I have rarely if ever mentioned Assisi or anything like that, not that it isn't worth mentioning.  I mostly stick to their encyclicals.

Immoral Popes might be allowed by God as a punishment for sins -- that already probably happened in the Renaissance.  As for "heretical Popes," it's an oxymoron.  This is not a case of "Do what they say and not what they do" because what they do AND say is rotten.  Therefore I have concluded that the real punishment that God has sent in our time is to blind people into believing that these men are Popes.  

Someone is being led astray all right but be careful -- it may not be us.  If you have sympathy with the resistance, join it!

As for Littlerose, I'll just let her dig her own grave.  The truth will out if God wants it out.  I have noticed that since becoming a sedevacantist I have become extremely unpopular with women.  My friend Brian who is a home-alone sedevacantist mostly sharing my position has a Novus Ordo wife who LOATHES me.  The fury of littlerose, whose feminist leanings are transparent, reminds me of this other woman.

It says somewhere in the Bible that when God is angry at a civilization he allows women to rule over them, and that is what is happening today.  There is a very strong feminist component to VII, although that whole outfit is run more by male witches than female ones.  

Spouse, there are plenty of excellent discussions at F-E and the puritanical side that is reflected here is not part of Catholicism. You are living in a culture that covers women in tents and cloaims we don't even have souls, and you might not have the full picture to be able to see that the "sedes" are not Catholic., They are anti-catholic. They are trying to create a Catholic Taliban, including the violence.

The truth is, sedes are so locked up in their own world/house they are to incompotent to take any kind of action... let alone strike anyone. They are all talk, and I know from the experience of having known a good lot.

Many cultures respect women and do not have purely sɛҳuąƖ thoughts about the human body, especially women's bodies. Modesty in most countries is reasonable, but only Muslims think a woman's face is dirty.  That is a sinful level of hate, and CM and the other men are attacking women in this  forum with the ridiculous demand that we must always have sex under the pretext that they are against "NFP" which is fully supported by the catholic church. Matthew has allowed this to go on continuously, and Mater has supported them, showing that they both know they are running an anti-Catholic hate site. They are trying to create a monstrous Taliban-like culture in this formerly free country.  

They have done no such thing. I cannot count how many times Chant has stated that this is NOT as sedevacantist site, it's owner IS OF THE SSPX POSITION REGARDING THE CRISIS IN THE CHURCH, and sedes are TOLERATED here for the sake of diversity of opinion and charity. Matthew is not responsible for the rants and ravings of others on this forum. If you would bother to read Matthews old posts (or better yet, talk to him)
you will see that he is anything but a sede-sympathizer.

Spouse of Jesus, Mater herself told me in a post that this is a "sede" site when I was criticizing Raoul, who is next to CM  one of the most hateful anti-catholics I've seen. The  "Sedes" are violent and racist liars. You do not have to support Israel and the zionists to recognize that WWII really did happen including the attemtpted genocide of the Jews. The fact that ever since the end of WWII the surviving Jews have exploited that tragedy to attack the very people who rescued them does not change history.

She said no such thing. She said that most of the users who post frequently are sedes. The reason she was admonishing you is because your engaging in the same rhetoric as Rauol and CM by saying they are not Catholic. In a sense they arent, but just because they believe that the pope is not the pope doesnt mean that they arent Catholic because that issue isnt even dogmatic (as they would like to believe) but falls into the realm of theological uncertainty because the Church has never really made a ruling on weather or not a pope can be deposed.

Im not a sede, but I dont have to be to not engage in their name calling.

Nor does one have to be a sede to not believe in the political insurance collection scam known as the h0Ɩ0cαųst.

*h0Ɩ0cαųst I should mention means "burnt sacrifice"... what do the Jews consider their departed, sacrifices? For what? The martyrdom of some of their earlier canonized victims will tell.*

In the past few weeks, Spouse, Matthew has been letting this board go out of control and he has posted a link to a site inviting people to make bombs. Haven't you seen that?

Again I'll say.... EVERYONE KNOWS HOW TO MAKE A BOMB.

Fish-Eaters has a wide range of threads and a responsible level of management, and unlike this forum, it is a Traditional Catholic forum.

Banning everyone who disagrees with the moderator isnt what I would call "responsible". I call it immaturity. I like a forum where I dont have to adapt my views to the moderator's just to keep from being banned.


Tell me littlerose, why do you point out Rauol and CM (THE TWO MOST DISLIKED MEMBERS ON CATHINFO  :good-shot: ) as being representatives of the whole forum? I dont understand that.

Quote from: Catholic Samurai

This is where the jokes etc. are posted and where us young'uns  can be silly without annoyance to the other members.

The irony is how intelligent and mature many of you young'uns are compared to some of the old ones, myself included.   :read-paper:

I think that's because we've fallen on our faces and grew up some pretty quick. I can say that for sure about Vladimir and myself.

But I would like to say publicly that Matthew has been a good example for all of us in the practice of prudence, patience, and charity and has contributed (unknowingly) indirectly to our character development. Of course we had to make fools of ourselves first *take a look at the old posts*.