SIX CONDITIONS

In an official letter of July 18 to Superiors of the Society of St Pius X, its General Secretary revealed the six “Conditions” for any future agreement between the SSPX and Rome. These were hammered out by discussion amongst the 39 capitulants of early July. Surely these Conditions demonstrate an alarming weakness on the part of the Society’s leaders as a whole.

The first “essential requirement” is freedom for the Society to teach the unchanging truth of Catholic Tradition, and to criticize those responsible for the errors of modernism, liberalism and Vatican II. Well and good. But notice how the Chapter’s vision has changed from that of Archbishop Lefebvre. No longer “Rome must convert because Truth is absolute”, but now merely “The SSPX demands freedom for itself to tell the Truth.” Instead of attacking the Conciliar treachery, the SSPX now wants the traitors to give it permission to tell the Truth ? “O, what a fall was there !”

The second condition requires exclusive use of the 1962 liturgy. Again, well and good, insofar as the 1962 liturgy is no such betrayal of the Faith as is the Conciliar liturgy imposed by Rome from 1969 onwards. But do we not right now see Rome preparing to impose on Traditional Congregations that have submitted to its authority a “mutual enrichment” Missal, mixing Tradition and the Novus Ordo? Once the SSPX were to have submitted to Rome, why should it be any more protected ?

The third condition requires the guarantee of at least one bishop. The key question here is, who will choose him ? Readers, in the text of any future “agreement” with Rome, go straight for the paragraph about the appointment of bishops. In 1988 Rome proposed that the Archbishop present a selection of three candidates for Rome to choose one. Rome then rejected all three. When will people get it ? Catholics must fight and fight in this titanic war between the religion of God and the religion of man.

The fourth condition desires that the Society have its own tribunals of the first instance. But if any higher tribunal is of the official Church and can undo the lower tribunals’ decisions, what Catholic decision of any Society tribunal will still have any force at all ?

The fifth condition desires exemption of SSPX houses from control by diocesan bishops. Unbelievable ! For nigh on 40 years the SSPX has been fighting to save the Faith by protecting its true practice from interference by the local Conciliar bishops, and now comes the General Chapter merely desiring independence from them ? The Society is not what it was, dear readers. It is in the hands of people quite different from Archbishop Lefebvre !

The sixth and last condition desires a Commission to be set up in Rome to look after Tradition, with a a strong representation from Tradition, but “dependent on the Pope”. Dependent on the Pope ? But have the Conciliar Popes not been ringleaders of Conciliarism ? Is Conciliarism no longer a problem ?

In conclusion, these six conditions are excessively grave. Unless the Society’s leadership is shaken out of its dream of peace with Conciliar Rome as revealed by them, then the last worldwide bastion of Catholic Tradition risks being on its way to surrendering to the enemies of the Faith. Maybe bastions are out of date.

Friends, prepare to fight for the Faith from within your homes. Fortify your homes.

Kyrie eleison.

© 2012 Richard N. Williamson. All Rights Reserved.





Donate

While Eleison Comments is provided free of charge, there are administrative and technical costs associated with making it available to subscribers worldwide and with operating the site. Contributions to offset these costs are appreciated, and may be made by contacting:

donate@dinoscopus.org

Obviously Bp Fellay and friends have not read Piers Compton's THE BROKEN CROSS (available free on the internet), or if they have, they reckon it's another conspiracy theory.

These were hammered out by discussion amongst the 39 capitulants of early July.  (Emphasis added.)

The nature and tone of these remarks by Bishop Williamson gives credence to Father Pfeiffer's recent comments that claim Bishop Fellay is hell bent (pardon the pun) on reaching a deal with Conciliar, and unconverted, rome.

I would like to say that we should not focus exclusively on the signing of an agreement as the "sell-out issue".  SSPX's problem is much bigger and deeper than that.  And please, don't misunderstand me: I am not saying that an agreement with the conciliar rome would be a good thing; what I'm saying is that the agreement is not the main and final point.

We must keep in mind that the devil is behind all this, and that he wants to destroy the Church to avoid the souls to have a salvation media.  Destroying the Tradition is part —if not all— of what he needs to do.  So, what he wants now is to end the SSPX since it is by now the bigger group world wide which keeps the Tradition.

Somehow, the devil seduced Bp. Fellay so that H. E. started to look for a roman recognition.  Some have suggested that Bp. Fellay wanted so from the very moment he became a seminarist.  I don't know whether this is true or not.  However, we know Bp. Fellay and many of H. E.'s collaborators have been seduced by the devil and are leading the Society toward modernism.

Having considered this, we should be thinking that the devil will try to do whatever fulfills his plan.  Whether it is an agreement or not, we don't know.  But just look around and see how much damage has been done so far and the agreement hasn't been signed yet.  An agreement could open the eyes of many who still don't want to accept the reality.

I know many say that B XVI wants to reconcile the SSPX with the church and that he is in a hurry to do it, since he is old enough to think his life is close to its end.  That could be true and the devil could be taking advantage of it, but if this is not what the devil has planed, he'll move his pieces to avoid it.

Thus, my point is that we should not be waiting for something may never happen.  We know the SSPX's leadership has taken the way of the lie and deception and should not be followed.  If an agreement is reached or not, won't change this fact.

We have been waiting for the condensed, short version of this story.

We now have it.

We are all obligated to memorize The Analysis of the Six Conditions.

(We are also obligated to know what the difference is between "essential
requirement" and "condition." We should be able to respond to questions about
the appropriateness of putting "conditions" on legitimate authority. This is a war
on information, and it is our duty to be prepared, so we can state these facts
clearly and without passion, because we need to exhibit a collected, calm resolve
redolent of a committed virtue, a high standard of principle, an unwavering
adherence to the "Faith of our Fathers, living still, in spite of dungeon, fire and
sword.")

If Our Good Bishop had the authority he deserves, he could run a rigorous class
in "Christian Warfare" which would not be entirely different from the BOOK that
the SSPX sells by that title, inasmuch as it is directed toward the same end. H.E.
would be the professor, and he could make this a mid-term exam. We should
study the material as if it were for just such a test. For our test may be coming,
indeed, only not under academic circuмstances!

Quote from: MaterDominici

.                                                         SIX CONDITIONS


In an official letter of July 18 to Superiors of the Society of St Pius X, its General Secretary revealed the six “Conditions” for any future agreement between the SSPX and Rome. These were hammered out by discussion amongst the 39 capitulants of early July. Surely these Conditions demonstrate an alarming weakness on the part of the Society’s leaders as a whole.

The first...
The second...
The third...
The fourth...
The fifth...
The sixth and last...
In Conclusion...

Friends, prepare to fight for the Faith from within your homes. Fortify your homes.

Kyrie eleison.

© 2012 Richard N. Williamson. All Rights Reserved.





Donate

While Eleison Comments is provided free of charge, there are administrative and technical costs associated with making it available to subscribers worldwide and with operating the site. Contributions to offset these costs are appreciated, and may be made by contacting:

donate@dinoscopus.org

A Spiritual Work of Mercy - Instruct the Ignorant

This copy of the Eleison Comments needs to be printed out by all of us
and placed at the back of chapels, under windshield wipers and printed in the St. Mary's Star!  

Regarding the St. Mary's Star... it needs to run weekly until the sell-out
or until the deposition of +Fallacious.

Bishop Williamson at his best! What an awesome issue of EC. Thanks for posting this, Mater.

God Bless Bishop Williamson.

Unless the Society’s leadership is shaken out of its dream of peace with Conciliar Rome as revealed by them, then the last worldwide bastion of Catholic Tradition risks being on its way to surrendering to the enemies of the Faith. Maybe bastions are out of date.

I suspected that Bishop Fellay might have been intimidated by a threat of some worldwide ʝʊdɛօmasonic clampdown if he did not submit the SSPX to Rome. That would explain the chutzpah of SSPX corporate signatory Maximilian Krah's intentional provocation of the hardliners by the flagrant advertisement of his Mossad connections.

Bishop Williamson's disturbing comment adds to my suspicion.

The link is http://www.saintspeterandpaulrcm.com/OPEN%20LETTERS/Culture%20Wars%20reply%20for%20web%20posting%209-10.htm since the footnotes didn't show correctly.