I don't think it was beneficial to the Traditional Catholic community. That's all I'm going to say about it. Let's just say it was too light on substance and too high on controversy to be worth the trouble -- or the risk.
Whistleblowing is one thing. But to blow the whistle, you have to offer testimony of hard facts that are important to the public good.
P.S. I gave the thread 3 days to "give it a chance". I always try to be fair, get the Truth out there, and generally serve the cause of Good, especially the public good of the Traditional Catholic world. But all that glitters isn't gold. Not every apparent "expose" is good, holy, or worth spreading.