Author Topic: Worst enemies of the American brand of resistance. (Read 19698 times)

Centroamerica · « **on:** February 21, 2014, 08:39:06 AM »

Since we all know that the American brand of the resistance, which is not confined to the US, has became extremely comfortable with the Novus Ordo sect just as my last thread showed (even allowing their immorality to enter within the flock where women attend Mass wearing immodest clothing (you've passed by a Novus Ordo parish and seen the immodest near prostitute like garb they enter in the church with we know you have), I have to ask: Who is the worst enemy for the American brand of the resistance?

Is it the sedevacantists?

Or

Is it the SSPX?

Which group does the resistance hate the most and why?

We know they are not concerned with the Novus Ordo sect, since most admit they are coming from it bringing all their confusions along with them. All of the energy and efforts are spent on slamming and spreading rumors about the SSPX in order to justify their existence in the first place and then attacking sedevacantists as if to prove that that is not who they are or to rebut any accusation of sedevacantism. Have they forgot that the original modernists (those of the Novus Ordo sect) are the actual problem?

ggreg · « **Reply #1 on:** February 21, 2014, 10:20:22 AM »

The worst enemy is the resistance themselves.

Compared to the damage they do to themselves by their nuttiness, the outside forces are insignificant.

One does not need to attack the resistance. Simply wait for Fr. Pfeiffer to say something crackers and the whole thing begins to lose credibility. That statement about Ratzinger can never be withdrawn. It is out there now and will be found by a Google search for the next 10 years.

Anything he says in the future, people will simply say, "Oh, yeah? Like that time you said Pope Benedict killed a child in a Satanic Ritual?". His credibility is done, toasted to a crisp. The only way for him to keep the loons who stay happy is to repeat the mistake and get even more crackers. Which is exactly what will happen.

Collecting a lot of hot headed people in one place is never a good idea. To be stable organisations need balance and calm heads. This is one reason that after a revolution the new dictator has to kill a lot of the original hot headed people because they keep destabilizing things.

Mama ChaCha · « **Reply #2 on:** February 21, 2014, 10:36:18 AM »

We need Archbishop Lefebvre...

1st Mansion Tenant · « **Reply #3 on:** February 21, 2014, 02:19:27 PM »

ggreg, I think you must have momentarily forgotten that Fr Pfieffer is not 'The Resistance'. He has played an integral part in it, but he is not it's sum total. I wish he hadn't mentioned the Bohemian Grove story. Not because it impossible and crazy, but because he should have had solid proof first. But, I think it is a bit soon to write off the whole resistance as doomed to failure because of it. There are many good priests in the resistance, including Fr Pfieffer, and more trickling in all the time. If we spent half the time praying for them that we do nit-picking for reasons to give them black eyes, I think we would all be in much better shape.

hollingsworth · « **Reply #4 on:** February 21, 2014, 02:42:53 PM »

I think ggreg was against the "resistance" long before Fr. Pheiffer's insinuations were ever made. I think he has been basically anti-Williamson and pro-neosspx from the beginning. In other words, if memory serves me correctly, ggreg never stood in opposition to Fellay & Co. on any level. If I'm wrong, ggreg, please correct my earlier perceptions. I encountered you on IA from time to time, and these are the impressions I came away with from your extensive commentary there. Or am I getting my "gregs" mixed up?

Ekim · « **Reply #5 on:** February 21, 2014, 05:52:09 PM »

Hate? REALLY? HATE? I don't speak for any "Resistance".but I can say that the people I know who are fighting to keep the mission of ABL alive don't HATE anyone. If anything, they feel sad for them. They offer sacrificesfor them. They pray for them. But hate them? Never.

ggreg · « **Reply #6 on:** February 21, 2014, 06:31:03 PM »

Quote from: 1st Mansion Tenant

ggreg, I think you must have momentarily forgotten that Fr Pfieffer is not 'The Resistance'. He has played an integral part in it, but he is not it's sum total. I wish he hadn't mentioned the Bohemian Grove story. Not because it impossible and crazy, but because he should have had solid proof first. But, I think it is a bit soon to write off the whole resistance as doomed to failure because of it. There are many good priests in the resistance, including Fr Pfieffer, and more trickling in all the time. If we spent half the time praying for them that we do nit-picking for reasons to give them black eyes, I think we would all be in much better shape.

What priest's name is most commonly typed on this forum when discussing the Resistance?

Which other resistance priest has more sermons and speeches posted on youtube?

Who else has a seminary set up on his family's land?

Fr. Pfeiffer is a figurehead.

Centroamerica · « **Reply #7 on:** February 21, 2014, 06:53:02 PM »

Celebrity priests are always hard to take seriously.

Nickolas · « **Reply #8 on:** February 21, 2014, 07:15:28 PM »

Quote from: Centroamerica

Since we all know that the American brand of the resistance, which is not confined to the US, has became extremely comfortable with the Novus Ordo sect just as my last thread showed (even allowing their immorality to enter within the flock where women attend Mass wearing immodest clothing (you've passed by a Novus Ordo parish and seen the immodest near prostitute like garb they enter in the church with we know you have), I have to ask: Who is the worst enemy for the American brand of the resistance?

Is it the sedevacantists?

Or

Is it the SSPX?

Which group does the resistance hate the most and why?

We know they are not concerned with the Novus Ordo sect, since most admit they are coming from it bringing all their confusions along with them. All of the energy and efforts are spent on slamming and spreading rumors about the SSPX in order to justify their existence in the first place and then attacking sedevacantists as if to prove that that is not who they are or to rebut any accusation of sedevacantism. Have they forgot that the original modernists (those of the Novus Ordo sect) are the actual problem?

Centroamerica, what is your actual intent with such an inflamatory post? Are you trying to divide, inflame "hate" as you assert exists in the Resistance? Just what are your intentions? Yours is a very strange post and appears to be meant to stir up strife amongst Traditional Catholics. Is that what we are to be about with our limited time here? I do not believe so.

JPaul · « **Reply #9 on:** February 21, 2014, 08:02:42 PM »

This is what happens when one is careless or reckless in speaking. His enemies will always seize upon his lapses and try to ruin him.

The resistance should be exceedingly careful in their actions, as they are a new entity which has not had the time to build up a sufficient reserve of goodwill which might stave off the effects of the occasional bout of self immolation.

Viva Cristo Rey · « **Reply #10 on:** February 21, 2014, 08:07:55 PM »

Quote from: Centroamerica

Since we all know that the American brand of the resistance, which is not confined to the US, has became extremely comfortable with the Novus Ordo sect just as my last thread showed (even allowing their immorality to enter within the flock where women attend Mass wearing immodest clothing (you've passed by a Novus Ordo parish and seen the immodest near prostitute like garb they enter in the church with we know you have), I have to ask: Who is the worst enemy for the American brand of the resistance?

Is it the sedevacantists?

Or

Is it the SSPX?

Which group does the resistance hate the most and why?

We know they are not concerned with the Novus Ordo sect, since most admit they are coming from it bringing all their confusions along with them. All of the energy and efforts are spent on slamming and spreading rumors about the SSPX in order to justify their existence in the first place and then attacking sedevacantists as if to prove that that is not who they are or to rebut any accusation of sedevacantism. Have they forgot that the original modernists (those of the Novus Ordo sect) are the actual problem?

Catholics shouldn't hate anyone.

Viva Cristo Rey · « **Reply #11 on:** February 21, 2014, 08:10:25 PM »

Quote from: Mama ChaCha

We need Archbishop Lefebvre...
[/quote

We need God and our Blessed Mother. We need the true Catholic faith.

Viva Cristo Rey · « **Reply #12 on:** February 21, 2014, 08:16:17 PM »

Catholics don't hate anyone

holysoulsacademy · « **Reply #13 on:** February 22, 2014, 12:57:06 AM »

Catholics hate ~ SIN!

Pete Vere · « **Reply #14 on:** February 22, 2014, 09:11:35 PM »

Quote from: hollingsworth

I think ggreg was against the "resistance" long before Fr. Pheiffer's insinuations were ever made. I think he has been basically anti-Williamson and pro-neosspx from the beginning. In other words, if memory serves me correctly, ggreg never stood in opposition to Fellay & Co. on any level. If I'm wrong, ggreg, please correct my earlier perceptions. I encountered you on IA from time to time, and these are the impressions I came away with from your extensive commentary there. Or am I getting my "gregs" mixed up?

Regardless, I think GGreg is right. The Resistance's worst enemy is itself, which is why I believe it will be absorbed into sedevacantism eventually. Additionally, I agree with Greg that Fr Pfeiffer's comments about Pope Benedict cannot be undone in today's media.

As for where GGreg has stood on the issues, as I have said in the past, his substance and style are the closest thing to Michael Davies that I have seen since Davies passed away.