Do you know how many Masonic handshakes have been given in front of cameras? It's a form of psychological battery. Sort of like with 9/11, they want you to know; the devil gets souls more easily when people go into denial about what is right in front of their faces.

In a way, it makes them complicit. Like when Antichrist comes, and people sense it must be him -- who else has that kind of power? -- yet they simply switch off their minds because they don't want to face it. This makes it very convenient for them, when Catholics are being tortured, to make an excuse for themselves and for their leader, and of course, he will come up with some slick excuse that they will lap up.

The devil loves it when people go into denial, and when he makes things really obvious, and they STILL go into denial, it just makes it worse for them. It's a kind of taunt, like he's saying to people "Compromisers, cowards, I'm going to show myself to you and you still won't do anything." To get to heaven, you have to love the truth, and fight evil. Just wanting to be nice doesn't cut it, because that kind of "niceness" leads to what I just described, going along with evil.

However, I have no idea if this was a real Masonic handshake.

In a way, it's not that difficult to imagine the time of Antichrist today in 2013 -- since we're so close and all!

Wise men even say that we're in the "dress rehearsal for Antichrist" today.

The techniques that have been recently born will continue to be used, with ever-increasing potency and precision.

It will be like Vatican II, 9/11, etc. etc.

I think Raoul is especially on to something with the whole "being complicit with deception" thing. When it becomes very inconvenient for a person to admit X, he is more inclined to deny it -- even if the reasoning for denying X is downright ridiculous. Normally I wouldn't think that possible, but what I've seen (in the last 13 years alone) proves otherwise.

I mean, who would have thought we'd have a "President Obama" less than 7 years after the world was convinced that the 9/11 attacks were perpetrated by a Muslim named "Osama"?  I used to think that human psychology alone would have prevented that.

And isn't it obvious that Obama isn't a natural-born citizen? And he seems to be destroying the country and leading us to communism in ways that Carter, Clinton, etc. could only dream about. He's our first Muslim president, and his actions and agenda are beyond the pale. And yet he got re-elected! And still few want to admit that we have a real problem here in the USA.

Elsa's on our side; Tele's on our side; Mathew's on our side;Spiritus' on our side--
why the necessity to slam each other? "You're too proud"; "He's a paranoid"; "You're jealous of alpha males."  If this is the way we treat those who we think are the friends of Christ, how in the world will we ever attract those who should also be His friends? We do realize, don't we, that the brainwashed friends of Fellay, even though openly they are told to stay off the internet, read these pages?

  Sometimes I wish that, when DARPA and Microsoft were developing this medium, they required that, once a message is typed, you had to do 100 push ups, 35 pull ups, then walk three blocks down the street and push a button on the telephone pole that said "okay--send now!"  Perhaps then we wouldn't send out so much stuff attacking our own friends.