Catholic Info
Traditional Catholic Faith => SSPX Resistance News => Topic started by: Matthew on July 16, 2013, 04:01:55 PM
-
I'm not a Raoul "groupie", but he used to make a lot of good posts. Well, here's one of them.
On the topic of compromise psychology, psychology in general, Antichrist, etc. he's completely "nailed" it.
Think about what he says long and hard. It's worthy of a 15-20 minute silent reflection. Think about the time of Antichrist, what it will be like -- I think it will be exactly as he describes.
Do you know how many Masonic handshakes have been given in front of cameras? It's a form of psychological battery. Sort of like with 9/11, they want you to know; the devil gets souls more easily when people go into denial about what is right in front of their faces.
In a way, it makes them complicit. Like when Antichrist comes, and people sense it must be him -- who else has that kind of power? -- yet they simply switch off their minds because they don't want to face it. This makes it very convenient for them, when Catholics are being tortured, to make an excuse for themselves and for their leader, and of course, he will come up with some slick excuse that they will lap up.
The devil loves it when people go into denial, and when he makes things really obvious, and they STILL go into denial, it just makes it worse for them. It's a kind of taunt, like he's saying to people "Compromisers, cowards, I'm going to show myself to you and you still won't do anything." To get to heaven, you have to love the truth, and fight evil. Just wanting to be nice doesn't cut it, because that kind of "niceness" leads to what I just described, going along with evil.
However, I have no idea if this was a real Masonic handshake.
-
In a way, it's not that difficult to imagine the time of Antichrist today in 2013 -- since we're so close and all!
Wise men even say that we're in the "dress rehearsal for Antichrist" today.
The techniques that have been recently born will continue to be used, with ever-increasing potency and precision.
It will be like Vatican II, 9/11, etc. etc.
I think Raoul is especially on to something with the whole "being complicit with deception" thing. When it becomes very inconvenient for a person to admit X, he is more inclined to deny it -- even if the reasoning for denying X is downright ridiculous. Normally I wouldn't think that possible, but what I've seen (in the last 13 years alone) proves otherwise.
I mean, who would have thought we'd have a "President Obama" less than 7 years after the world was convinced that the 9/11 attacks were perpetrated by a Muslim named "Osama"? I used to think that human psychology alone would have prevented that.
And isn't it obvious that Obama isn't a natural-born citizen? And he seems to be destroying the country and leading us to communism in ways that Carter, Clinton, etc. could only dream about. He's our first Muslim president, and his actions and agenda are beyond the pale. And yet he got re-elected! And still few want to admit that we have a real problem here in the USA.
-
However, I have no idea if this was a real Masonic handshake.
This pretty much undercuts the credibility.
Oh I have no idea if it is what I said it was - a form of psychological battery designed to prepare us for the coming of the anti-Christ!
-
However, I have no idea if this was a real Masonic handshake.
This pretty much undercuts the credibility.
Oh I have no idea if it is what I said it was - a form of psychological battery designed to prepare us for the coming of the anti-Christ!
I know, it's hard for an alpha male to give credit to another alpha male, and you're jealous of the positive attention I've just given Raoul.
But all he said was that EVEN IF IT WERE a Masonic handshake, it would make sense (and here is why...)
Then at the end he points out that he's not an expert on Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ.
I don't see a contradiction in his post at all. I think you're the one with reading comprehension issues. You're blinded by your emotion of jealousy of other alpha-males.
-
I liked Raoul and wish he still posted here often, even though he thought I was a devious infiltrator.
-
I liked Raoul and wish he still posted here often, even though he thought I was a devious infiltrator.
He is a paranoid.
-
Looking at the post in the context of what Sigismund said it makes more sense.
We are nevertheless fortunate to have Raoul no longer posting here.
-
Raoul did go too far in 2012 with Tele. His obsession with smearing him was appalling.
-
In a way, it's not that difficult to imagine the time of Antichrist today in 2013 -- since we're so close and all!
Wise men even say that we're in the "dress rehearsal for Antichrist" today.
The techniques that have been recently born will continue to be used, with ever-increasing potency and precision.
It will be like Vatican II, 9/11, etc. etc.
I think Raoul is especially on to something with the whole "being complicit with deception" thing. When it becomes very inconvenient for a person to admit X, he is more inclined to deny it -- even if the reasoning for denying X is downright ridiculous. Normally I wouldn't think that possible, but what I've seen (in the last 13 years alone) proves otherwise.
I mean, who would have thought we'd have a "President Obama" less than 7 years after the world was convinced that the 9/11 attacks were perpetrated by a Muslim named "Osama"? I used to think that human psychology alone would have prevented that.
And isn't it obvious that Obama isn't a natural-born citizen? And he seems to be destroying the country and leading us to communism in ways that Carter, Clinton, etc. could only dream about. He's our first Muslim president, and his actions and agenda are beyond the pale. And yet he got re-elected! And still few want to admit that we have a real problem here in the USA.
Yes you are so right. Obama was even voted a second was shock too. Vatican ii Catholics like cardinal Dolan, sr Simone Campbell, sr carol keehan, nj gov Christie were hugging and kissing Obama after the attacks on Catholicism when God was booed and catholic teachings were tossed aside for Obamacare.
-
Hundreds of pictures and sites advertising that Obama is a rabbi (literally) (https://www.google.com.py/search?q=pictures+obama+rabbi&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ei=Z3_mUdGUKKetiAL5noGoBQ&ved=0CCoQsAQ&biw=1024&bih=629)
Trying to find the one proving his genealogical relation to the Queen as rabbis themselves were showing to Obama (he liked it!). Naturally.
Bushito as well enjoyed this company (may be I'll find both photographs/sites).
-
Elsa's on our side; Tele's on our side; Mathew's on our side;Spiritus' on our side--
why the necessity to slam each other? " You're too proud"; "He's a paranoid"; "you're jealous of alpha males. " if this is the eay we treat those who we think are the friends of Christ, how in the world will we ever attract those who should also be His friends? We do realize, don't we, that the brainwashed friends of Fellay, even though openly they are told to stay off the internet, read these pages?
Sometimes I wish that, when DARPA and Microsoft were developing this medium, they required that, once a message is typed, you had to do 100 push ups, 35 pull ups, then walk three blocks down the street and push a button on the telephone pole that said "okay--send now!" Perhps wouldn't send out so much stuff attacking our own friends.
-
If you think it's insane that Obama was re-elected wait until the third Bush gets into the White House.
-
Anthony Wiener is running for mayor of NYC. How sickening is this? For those of you elsewhere, he's the congressman who was forced to resign after he sent photos of himself in his birthday suit to college women...unsolicited. He's a not at all attractive balding Jєωιѕн guy in his mid-50s. :facepalm:
-
-
Elsa's on our side; Tele's on our side; Mathew's on our side;Spiritus' on our side--
why the necessity to slam each other? "You're too proud"; "He's a paranoid"; "You're jealous of alpha males." If this is the way we treat those who we think are the friends of Christ, how in the world will we ever attract those who should also be His friends? We do realize, don't we, that the brainwashed friends of Fellay, even though openly they are told to stay off the internet, read these pages?
Sometimes I wish that, when DARPA and Microsoft were developing this medium, they required that, once a message is typed, you had to do 100 push ups, 35 pull ups, then walk three blocks down the street and push a button on the telephone pole that said "okay--send now!" Perhaps then we wouldn't send out so much stuff attacking our own friends.
Let me guess........... Hugh: Once a Marine, always a Marine?
And then there's Tele, who gets 3 up thumbs on a post where he has
no words showing up, and when you try to quote it there's no quote
box either. Three thumbs for a ghost post???
-
Neil, seems to me it is for people to read Tele's words in the bottom; you made me laugh. Like your so funny "*HEBF" is on sabbatical" ?
Hugeman, I might try to apply your "three blocks" when I read a post attacking +W in any way, openly or not. Father Fore used to tell me to move my tongue ("darle vuelta a mi lengua") 30 times before speaking (in defence of +W naturally) so as to say it calmly and properly. He says the same things but very politely so now that he is not here I just "transfer" to him my concerns for him to deal with them. I just say/write things without any "ornament" and in a rather violent way. That's the reason I only talk to two here other than my tiny family...
Zeitun, you made my day with your post "If you think it's insane that Obama was re-elected wait until the third Bush gets into the White House"!: Bushitito (Bush, Bushito, Bushitito).
-
There is no accountability with our politicians except for being PC.
-
.
Elsa, you should know that the English reader could easily think you
left out an "l" when you write that, between the "u" and the "s".
-
.
Elsa, you should know that the English reader could easily think you
left out an "l" when you write that, between the "u" and the "s".
Woops. Make that two -- "ll" "...ulls..."
-
Neil, seems to me it is for people to read Tele's words in the bottom; you made me laugh. Like your so funny "*HEBF" is on sabbatical" ?
Hugeman, I might try to apply your "three blocks" when I read a post attacking +W in any way, openly or not. Father Fore used to tell me to move my tongue ("darle vuelta a mi lengua") 30 times before speaking (in defence of +W naturally) so as to say it calmly and properly. He says the same things but very politely so now that he is not here I just "transfer" to him my concerns for him to deal with them. I just say/write things without any "ornament" and in a rather violent way. That's the reason I only talk to two here other than my tiny family...
Zeitun, you made my day with your post "If you think it's insane that Obama was re-elected wait until the third Bush gets into the White House"!: Bushitito (Bush, Bushito, Bushitito).
I knew something was awry when last year they dragged Jebby out of retirement to comment on Romney.