Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Why the shock when the SSPX acts Catholic?  (Read 5094 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jen51

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1702
  • Reputation: +1750/-70
  • Gender: Female
Why the shock when the SSPX acts Catholic?
« Reply #30 on: March 31, 2013, 10:08:41 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Graham
    Quote from: Nadir
    Quote from: 1st Mansion Tenant
    Ok - were the thumbs down in my post above given because I am not afraid of guns, or because three bigots would rather die in their sins and risk Hell  than have a black priest at the end? Just wondering. :confused1:


    My guess would be the latter.


    Is that an intelligent guess? That anyone would rather risk going to Hell than accept a sacrament from a black priest?

    Or was hers just an eyeroll-worthy comment?


    My guess would be the latter.
    Religion clean and undefiled before God and the Father, is this: to visit the fatherless and widows in their tribulation: and to keep one's self unspotted from this world.
    ~James 1:27


    Offline s2srea

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5106
    • Reputation: +3896/-48
    • Gender: Male
    Why the shock when the SSPX acts Catholic?
    « Reply #31 on: March 31, 2013, 10:37:10 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Telesphorus
    (they were pretty silly posts, IMO)


    I'm not surprised you would say this, but I'm curious if you're brave enough to say why. As soon as I read the posts Matt made, I thought of how this is exactly what you're known for (ie- what Matt was describing in his posts).


    Offline Neil Obstat

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 18177
    • Reputation: +8276/-692
    • Gender: Male
    Why the shock when the SSPX acts Catholic?
    « Reply #32 on: April 01, 2013, 05:42:26 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: s2srea
    Quote from: Telesphorus
    (they were pretty silly posts, IMO)


    I'm not surprised you would say this, but I'm curious if you're brave enough to say why. As soon as I read the posts Matt made, I thought of how this is exactly what you're known for (ie- what Matt was describing in his posts).



    Funny, I had an entirely different outlook, since what he seemed to be
    upset about

    Post
    Quote
    When people make sweeping statements like "the SSPX can be liturgically careless"


    is pretty much found in a post that he had made himself:  

    Post
    Quote

    Catholic priests have always had it within them to be liturgically careless.

    .--. .-.-.- ... .-.-.- ..-. --- .-. - .... . -.- .. -. --. -.. --- -- --..-- - .... . .--. --- .-- . .-. .- -. -.. -....- -....- .--- ..- ... - -.- .. -.. -.. .. -. --. .-.-.

    Offline AlligatorDicax

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 908
    • Reputation: +372/-173
    • Gender: Male
    Why the shock when the SSPX acts Catholic?
    « Reply #33 on: April 03, 2013, 01:00:52 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Matthew (Mar 29, 2013, 11:02 pm)
    Women are [....] also more interested in practicality and details.

    That assessment will come as quite a surprise to members of the engineering profession, which historically is predominately male.  Historically, it also has been a refuge for quite a few men whose overt personna might fairly be described as "male chauvinist".

    Quite a digression from the original topic as indicated by its 'Subject' line, but postings preceding mine already seem to have established the digression.

    Offline Neil Obstat

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 18177
    • Reputation: +8276/-692
    • Gender: Male
    Why the shock when the SSPX acts Catholic?
    « Reply #34 on: April 03, 2013, 11:22:53 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: AlligatorDicax
    Quote from: Matthew (Mar 29, 2013, 11:02 pm)
    Women are [....] also more interested in practicality and details.

    That assessment will come as quite a surprise to members of the engineering profession, which historically is predominately male.  Historically, it also has been a refuge for quite a few men whose overt personna might fairly be described as "male chauvinist".

    Quite a digression from the original topic as indicated by its 'Subject' line, but postings preceding mine already seem to have established the digression.


    Quite a digression is right.  

    Let's see..............  I recall seeing a discussion about men's ability to achieve  
    practicality in applied engineering principles and how technical details might be
    better handled by women - OR NOT - but I don't remember which thread it was
    on.................. let's see:



    Young Dress to Kill SSPX Schools Girls    
    Fellay to resign as superior general
    Texas being ignored -- WHY?
    Monastery of Santa Cruz, Fr. Tomas de Azuino    
    Bishop Fellay strategic output and Bishop de Galarreta input?
    Neo-SSPX about to lose its German Carmel Topic Rating
    Why the shock when the SSPX acts Catholic?
    Fr. Bufe - Ireland
    The Recusant - Issue 6 - April 2013
    Reminder of Bp. Williamsons schedule in New Jersey
    Eleison Comments by Mgr Williamson - Issue 279
    Neo-SSPX and the "Spirit of Vatican II"
    No Genuflection Today for the Jєωs! My priest
    Bishop Fellay needs to step down
    Fr Girouard



    Oh, yeah!  There it is!  

    Why the shock when the SSPX acts Catholic!  

    That's the ticket!!


    Now let's try the search feature.  But we have to wait 30 seconds...........
    .............................................................................................................
    ..............................................................................................................
    ...........................................................................................................
    ..............................................................................................................
    ............................................................................................................
    ...........................................



    .--. .-.-.- ... .-.-.- ..-. --- .-. - .... . -.- .. -. --. -.. --- -- --..-- - .... . .--. --- .-- . .-. .- -. -.. -....- -....- .--- ..- ... - -.- .. -.. -.. .. -. --. .-.-.


    Offline hugeman

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 342
    • Reputation: +669/-1
    • Gender: Male
      • h
    Why the shock when the SSPX acts Catholic?
    « Reply #35 on: April 04, 2013, 08:31:24 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Neil Obstat
    Quote from: AlligatorDicax
    Quote from: Matthew (Mar 29, 2013, 11:02 pm)
    Women are [....] also more interested in practicality and details.

    That assessment will come as quite a surprise to members of the engineering profession, which historically is predominately male.  Historically, it also has been a refuge for quite a few men whose overt personna might fairly be described as "male chauvinist".

    Quite a digression from the original topic as indicated by its 'Subject' line, but postings preceding mine already seem to have established the digression.


    Quite a digression is



    Oh, yeah!  There it is!  

    Why the shock when the SSPX acts Catholic!  

    That's the ticket!!


    Now let's try the search


    Neil-- That was a good one! :)