Author Topic: Why the New Bishops are not True Bishops  (Read 632 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline nadieimportante

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 771
  • Reputation: +496/-0
  • Gender: Male
Why the New Bishops are not True Bishops
« on: June 01, 2012, 11:55:42 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • http://www.sspx.org/miscellaneous/sedevacantism/validity_of_episcopal_consecrations.pdf

    Seven years ago the  above linked article appeared in the Angelus Magazine cover. Upon looking at it ( I never read it), I commented to my wife that it was put there to be able to unite with Rome. To me, it was the first sign of a break in the SSPX. Thereafter, many other signs appeared, and today we are at the crossroad of the mother of all "changes" for SSPXers. Everything that has been built may be taken from us.

    No wonder everyone is worried. The possibility exists that a handful in the "governing body" can take everything away, and join Modernist Rome, which has changed NOTHING of the errors that the SSPX has shined the light on for 40+ years.

    Read the article. Since then, the same technique of publishing similar articles, to slow boil the faithful, has been going on in all the SSPX publications. The latest is the article on "Interpreting the words of Archbishop Lefebvre"
    http://www.sspx.org/archbishop_lefebvre/interpreting_words_of_archbishop_lefebvre_part_1_5-22-2012.htm. (which I also have not read)

    I ask, if the Novus Ordo Bishops & priests, and the N.O. Mass are are all valid, what do we need to go to an SSPX chapel for?

    Pray for the three Bishops, that they stay the side of truth. And pray for Bishop Fellay's return to the pure faith and sacred doctrines.
    "Wrong is wrong even if everyone is doing it.
     Right is right even if no one is doing it." - Saint Augustine

    Offline nadieimportante

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 771
    • Reputation: +496/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Why the New Bishops are not True Bishops
    « Reply #1 on: June 01, 2012, 12:19:41 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Here's an explanation and a refutaition of the SSPX article "Why the New Rite of Episcopal Consecration is Valid", the article is entitled:

    "Why the New Bishops Are Not True Bishops", by Rev. Anthony Cekada
    (hence the title of this thread)

    http://www.traditionalmass.org/images/articles/NotTruBps1.pdf
    "Wrong is wrong even if everyone is doing it.
     Right is right even if no one is doing it." - Saint Augustine


    Offline nadieimportante

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 771
    • Reputation: +496/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Why the New Bishops are not True Bishops
    « Reply #2 on: June 01, 2012, 12:36:42 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Interesting, from Why the New Bishops Are Not True Bishops:

    I  close with a personal anecdote: In August 1977 an old-line traditionalist
    passed along to me a favorite quote from Fr. Carl Pulvermacher, a Capuchin who
    had just started to work with SSPX, and would later write for and actually print
    The Angelus. “Once there are no more valid priests,” Fr. Carl would say, “they’ll permit the Latin Mass.” Prophetic words — but little could he have suspected that his own magazine and the superiors of SSPX themselves would one day help fulfill them!
    "Wrong is wrong even if everyone is doing it.
     Right is right even if no one is doing it." - Saint Augustine

     

    Sitemap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16