At times, I am subject to thinking along the same lines:
"Why does Fr. Pfeiffer go globetrotting with money donated by Americans?"
"Let the Asians, Aussies, and Europeans convince their own SSPX priests to join the Resistance, and then we won't have to have them draining 'our' priests, and depriving us of 'our' Masses," etc.
And then I remember:
The doctrine of necessity cuts both ways;
A priest is just as obliged in justice and charity in coming to the aid of the faithful requesting his assistance, as the faithful are justified in requesting it.
The main reason Archbishop Lefebvre went ahead with the 1988 consecrations was because he knew he had a strict obligation (sub gravi) to come to the aid of men caught in a state of grave general spiritual necessity (and if Rome wouldn't help him to supply for it, he was perfectly justified in supplying for it himself).
He could not avoid or refuse coming to their aid without damning himself.
Same goes for Fr. Pfeiffer.
The more time goes by, the more I understand his ways, and admire his priestly spirit.
So when I get dispirited, and am tempted to anger or discouragement that we don't have more Resistance Masses in St. Paul, I remember:
This great priest has a soul to save too, and duty is dictating his course of action.
Would you go to hell for eternity in order to please someone else?