Author Topic: Whose turn to be consecrated Bishop? (Read 10519 times)

Matthew · « **on:** November 28, 2016, 05:06:42 PM »

Just look at this:

Quote

On March 19, 2015, Bishop Williamson consecrated Bishop Jean-Michel Faure at the Benedictine Monastery of the Holy Cross in Nova Friburgo, Brazil.[14] Father Faure was one of the first members of the Society of St. Pius X and was even initially considered for the Episcopacy by Marcel Lefebvre in the 1988 Consecrations, though Faure turned down the selection; Alfonso de Galarreta was chosen in his place. Faure served the Society as District Superior of both Argentina and Mexico for many years.[15] While both had already been expelled from the Society, the SSPX condemned the consecration.

On March 19, 2016, one year after the 2015 Consecration, Bishop Williamson consecrated Bishop Miguel Ferreira da Costa, aka Fr Thomas Aquinas, at the same place. The SSPX did not comment the new consecration.

Apparently March 19 is the time to consecrate a Bishop, at least for His Excellency Bishop Williamson.

So the 10 million dollar question: who is next?

Just a few months until March 19, 2017...

Incredulous · « **Reply #1 on:** November 28, 2016, 05:45:13 PM »

March 2017 you say... ? :scratchchin:

Perhaps His Excellency should consecrate multiple Bishops, to give Catholic Tradition a hedge ?

In another post, we learn that 2017 has many zio-anniversaries for the celebrating Rothschild elite:

Why, if I was sentimental Rothschild, my ideal date in 2017 might be March 11, Purim.

This is the holiday when Jews celebrate being delivered from their enemies—and celebrate slaughtering them.

Matthew · « **Reply #2 on:** November 28, 2016, 06:18:52 PM »

The question is: What episcopal candidates are left, who haven't already been ordained?

Are there any other older priests that +Lefebvre considered consecrating -- and if so, are they still A) alive and B) still faithful to Tradition (including since 2012, when the SSPX set out on its false path back to Modernist Rome).

In that category, I wouldn't be surprised if the number was 0.

If this is the case, we might have to look to the next generation of priests: those formed in one of +ABL's seminaries, who are still faithful to Tradition, but who were too young (or not yet a priest) in 1988 to be considered for consecration.

I am not going to put out any names, since I'm A) the owner of CathInfo and B) the coordinator of St. Dominic's Chapel. Anything I say would automatically have a political dimension. Know what I mean?

I'll let you guys have the fun speculating.

Franciscan Solitary · « **Reply #3 on:** November 28, 2016, 06:21:39 PM »

Quote from: Matthew

Just look at this:

Quote
On March 19, 2015, Bishop Williamson consecrated Bishop Jean-Michel Faure at the Benedictine Monastery of the Holy Cross in Nova Friburgo, Brazil.[14] Father Faure was one of the first members of the Society of St. Pius X and was even initially considered for the Episcopacy by Marcel Lefebvre in the 1988 Consecrations, though Faure turned down the selection; Alfonso de Galarreta was chosen in his place. Faure served the Society as District Superior of both Argentina and Mexico for many years.[15] While both had already been expelled from the Society, the SSPX condemned the consecration.

On March 19, 2016, one year after the 2015 Consecration, Bishop Williamson consecrated Bishop Miguel Ferreira da Costa, aka Fr Thomas Aquinas, at the same place. The SSPX did not comment the new consecration.

Apparently March 19 is the time to consecrate a Bishop, at least for His Excellency Bishop Williamson.

So the 10 million dollar question: who is next?

Just a few months until March 19, 2017...

This puzzle must be one of the best Christmas presents ever:

And a joyful Advent everyone!!!

Franciscan Solitary · « **Reply #4 on:** November 28, 2016, 07:02:56 PM »

Quote from: Matthew

The question is: What episcopal candidates are left, who haven't already been ordained?

Are there any other older priests that +Lefebvre considered consecrating -- and if so, are they still A) alive and B) still faithful to Tradition (including since 2012, when the SSPX set out on its false path back to Modernist Rome).

In that category, I wouldn't be surprised if the number was 0.

If this is the case, we might have to look to the next generation of priests: those formed in one of +ABL's seminaries, who are still faithful to Tradition, but who were too young (or not yet a priest) in 1988 to be considered for consecration.

I am not going to put out any names, since I'm A) the owner of CathInfo and B) the coordinator of St. Dominic's Chapel. Anything I say would automatically have a political dimension. Know what I mean?

I'll let you guys have the fun speculating.

Were this lowly Franciscan to be greatly indulged, the choice might fall on Fr. Cyprian Rodriquez, O.S.B., legitimist Prior of Our Lady of Guadalupe Monastery in Silver City New Mexico.

Of course politics may never allow it, but at least one can always dream...