Author Topic: Whole Resistance has 2 Bishops, but not Boston KY? (Read 5691 times)

Matthew · « **on:** October 30, 2015, 11:27:22 AM »

I should point out that nowhere else in the Resistance is a "keen need for a bishop" felt, outside Boston, KY. Resistant groups all over the world have their Confirmation needs met, and other seminaries have their ordination needs met, by the two resistant bishops, +Williamson and +Faure.

This basically proves that they are neither unwilling to help, nor are they difficult to get along with. They go to all the "groups" in the resistance, wherever there is a need.

So why does Fr. Pfeiffer (and Fr. Hewko) alone have a problem with these 2 bishops? Might it have to do with Fr. Pfeiffer's animus dominandi (desire to dominate)? Maybe that's why he is understanding and tolerant of Pablo -- he has the same tendencies to "lord it over" his subjects.

He's losing touch with reality more and more all the time. Keeping pablo around, and now this con artist Ambrose, motivated by his intense emotional desire to stick it to +Williamson and show him a thing or two. And whenever he's justly criticized, he's "being persecuted" which "proves we are the true remnant". It's downright pathological.

They've even cut ties with Fr. Chazal! Their semi-official media organ even said he was part of the Lodge! Truth is stranger than fiction, folks. I can't make this stuff up. Fr. Chazal was with them from the beginning. But he stopped short at endorsing this clown Ambrose. He wasn't completely committed to the cult and its leader, Fr. Pfeiffer.

Boston KY is a train wreck. Talk about a sinking ship.

Ekim · « **Reply #1 on:** November 03, 2015, 08:10:27 AM »

Spoke to Fr. Hewko some time ago....probably 2014. He said the MUST have a Bishop because every priest needs to have Bishop to fall under. Without a Bishop at the helm, than Priests will be like a ship without a rudder. After all, the SSPX had ABL.

But Ambrose??? cuмon!

Ecclesiae · « **Reply #2 on:** November 03, 2015, 08:25:58 AM »

@EKIM
Not Ambrose. Bishop Pfeiifer! Father Hewkos dream.

@Matthew
Father Pfeiffer will end up to be alone.

And the 2 bishops that will pup up, as Ambrose Moran said in the mass, would be Pfeiffer and Hewko, but fr. Hewko doesn´t want to be a bishop...
Ambrose Moran in his sermon: "I have two bishops, who exist in secret. And, if I disappeared tomorrow, they would pop up. And so the Blessed Mother always has alternatives for you."
This words: the Blessed Mother has alternatives for you, are exactly the words of Mr. Pablo! HIS Mother Guadalupana (but not the true Mother of God from Guadelupe) takes care!
We will see how this masquerade ends!

Ekim · « **Reply #3 on:** November 03, 2015, 10:15:07 AM »

WOW! Scary stuff. Never considered them as the two "secret" "Bishops". I hope this speculation is all wrong.

This is starting to sound like a Malachi Martin novel. Like Matthew says, you just can't make this stuff up!

PG · « **Reply #4 on:** November 03, 2015, 11:08:59 AM »

ecclesiae - I think you have brought up a valid point. Fr. pfieffer has already bought into this whole secret clandestine style catholicism by his acceptance of ambrose. So, it would not surprise me if he has already been "consecrated" by this janitor, and is just keeping it secret.

Matthew · « **Reply #5 on:** November 03, 2015, 12:17:33 PM »

Quote from: + PG +

ecclesiae - I think you have brought up a valid point. Fr. pfieffer has already bought into this whole secret clandestine style catholicism by his acceptance of ambrose. So, it would not surprise me if he has already been "consecrated" by this janitor, and is just keeping it secret.

I brought up this theory several weeks ago.

I even wondered if it was the "change in his life" Fr. Voigt was mysteriously alluding to in his Open Letter.

Fr. Voigt explicitly denied that, however.

So if Fr. Pfeiffer has been consecrated (which is very possible!) it would have had to be after Fr. Voigt left the group. Fr. Voigt is trustworthy.

I still think it's possible (present, recent past, or future) and even likely. If he's already been consecration, (or already got his heart set on it) it would explain why he's throwing reason, common sense, and even Fr. Chazal under the bus for the sake of defending this Ambrose character.

Ecclesiae · « **Reply #6 on:** November 03, 2015, 12:32:59 PM »

I think that this Ambrose will one day have converted the seminarians to the orthodox faith!!! It´s my Intuition... Exactly that is going to happen, if it does not end. It becomes an Orthodox sect and after Pfeiffer's death, this disease continues... And the Devil is happy, he was the one working there, because he was called by the true Boss of this headquarter... you know who I mean... through sacrifices, spells, curses, and pride... and priests which allows this whole nightmare!

Ecclesiae · « **Reply #7 on:** November 03, 2015, 12:43:43 PM »

If father Pfeiffer has been consecrated, it would happen publicly! Don´t you think so?
I know father P. and when he is a bishop he doesn´t want to be a hidden bishop, but that everyone knows about it and is respectful towards him. I believe that Ambrose Moran has brought us a discreet warning that he will consecrate these 2 priests and one day they will pop up. Ambrose has a lot of self-confidence, by common sense, drugs or hypnosis? Or by spells?: "l consider the seminary canonically erected!" Hallelujah! :jumping2:

ManuelChavez · « **Reply #8 on:** November 03, 2015, 01:24:36 PM »

Quote from: Ecclesiae

I think that this Ambrose will one day have converted the seminarians to the orthodox faith!!! It´s my Intuition... Exactly that is going to happen, if it does not end. It becomes an Orthodox sect and after Pfeiffer's death, this disease continues... And the Devil is happy, he was the one working there, because he was called by the true Boss of this headquarter... you know who I mean... through sacrifices, spells, curses, and pride... and priests which allows this whole nightmare!

Pablo had an abundance of pride, and he can be hard-headed, among other things, but he is not guilty of sacrifices, spells or curses. There is no animal sacrifice pit in Kentucky, and he has not engaged in witchcraft. These are abominable lies. Do not continue to spread such vile accusations.

Ecclesiae · « **Reply #9 on:** November 03, 2015, 01:47:53 PM »

ManuelChavez, you wrote: "There is no animal sacrifice pit... and no witchcraft..." It´s a lie! And behind the chapel where sometimes the guys are sitting around the "campfire", which was constructed of stone and looks like an altar, where dogs are burnt (The dogs were killed, often shot or poisoned), is not a sacrifice? And other things that I do not list here, plus curses in spanish... You know as much about it as the man in the moon.

ManuelChavez · « **Reply #10 on:** November 03, 2015, 02:33:33 PM »

Quote from: Ecclesiae

ManuelChavez, you wrote: "There is no animal sacrifice pit... and no witchcraft..." It´s a lie! And behind the chapel where sometimes the guys are sitting around the "campfire", which was constructed of stone and looks like an altar, where dogs are burnt (The dogs were killed, often shot or poisoned), is not a sacrifice? And other things that I do not list here, plus curses in spanish... You know as much about it as the man in the moon.

The fire pit is owned by someone else, not Pablo. The dogs have been killed by various means; some ran in front of cars, and one was killed by an animal trap. These were burned, but not as as sacrifice. It was easier to burn them than bury them.

It is not constructed like an altar. I will post a picture soon.

Curses in Spanish? He may be occasionally foul-mouthed, but those aren't curses.

Stop your libelous accusations.

TheRealMcCoy · « **Reply #11 on:** November 03, 2015, 04:07:33 PM »

And who OWNS the property where the alleged firepit resides? Who allows all these evil things to take place? The family that owns the property, the board members.

Recusant Sede · « **Reply #12 on:** November 03, 2015, 04:25:22 PM »

Quote from: ManuelChavez

Quote from: Ecclesiae
ManuelChavez, you wrote: "There is no animal sacrifice pit... and no witchcraft..." It´s a lie! And behind the chapel where sometimes the guys are sitting around the "campfire", which was constructed of stone and looks like an altar, where dogs are burnt (The dogs were killed, often shot or poisoned), is not a sacrifice? And other things that I do not list here, plus curses in spanish... You know as much about it as the man in the moon.

The fire pit is owned by someone else, not Pablo. The dogs have been killed by various means; some ran in front of cars, and one was killed by an animal trap. These were burned, but not as as sacrifice. It was easier to burn them than bury them.

It is not constructed like an altar. I will post a picture soon.

Curses in Spanish? He may be occasionally foul-mouthed, but those aren't curses.

Stop your libelous accusations.

MC, it was easier to burn them or bury them???? Give me a brake! Who in their right mind would believe that? Oh that' sprightly there are people that still believe that Moran is not a pathological liar. I wonder how bad a burning dog smells?

I'm not saying that the dogs were sacrificed, I was not there, I don't know Pablo, but if you believe they were burned for convince, I have a bishop in Brooklyn for you to buy or should I say believe!

Ecclesiae · « **Reply #13 on:** November 03, 2015, 05:12:16 PM »

@Martin (ManuelChavez), don´t talk about things that you don´t know. Are you paid to make promotion for the seminary? You're single, why don´t you enter the seminary? You left the seminary, why? Because you want to be the chef? We do not need photos or any blog of you. Photos will not correspond to reality nor is it your testimony that counts. You have not lived there long enough and you have not seen and experienced, what the seminarians have experienced, heard and seen...
they fled! But you don´t ask why the seminarians left and why they are afraid to talk about their Kentucky time? Because there was neither the Christian spirit, nor morals, nor decency... but bad and diabolical experiences. Today, it is only the facts that count, the testimony of those who have left the place. What should we say about your spirit and a your precious Orthodox seminary? By their fruit you will recognize them! A precious mess!

Matthew · « **Reply #14 on:** November 03, 2015, 05:24:26 PM »

Quote from: Recusant Sede

MC, it was easier to burn them or bury them???? Give me a brake! Who in their right mind would believe that? Oh that' sprightly there are people that still believe that Moran is not a pathological liar. I wonder how bad a burning dog smells?

I'm not saying that the dogs were sacrificed, I was not there, I don't know Pablo, but if you believe they were burned for convince, I have a bishop in Brooklyn for you to buy or should I say believe!

Good point.

Manuel confirms that A) there is a pit and B) several dogs were indeed burnt. That is exactly what was reported here on CathInfo.

The reader can decide if this is something serious or not.

Oh, and I should point out that Pablo has been known to have an unhealthy fascination with the devil to the point of superstition, he is extremely proud, he always wears black sunglasses, he doesn't receive the Sacraments (he's apostate) and he "practices Omerta" by his own admission...

Would a man like this perform some kind of animal sacrifices? Who knows. As I've said before, normally "animal sacrifice" would be a ridiculous charge to level against most people. But in this case, it's really not. I can honestly say, "I just don't know."

I didn't personally witness anything in Boston, KY, but I'll tell you this -- the pile of evidence is certainly enough to decide I will STEER CLEAR of that place!