It seem to me that, based on some of +Williamson's approaches, the first pick would be Fr. Trincado.
Other capable candidates would be a little obvious: Fr. Pfeiffer, Fr. Hewko, Fr. Chazal, Dom Tomas Aquinas; but living a monastic benedictine life might be a hindrance to the latter... God knows though.
What is certain is that Bishop Williamson has disclosed to one of these priests cited above that the matter of new consecrations is not up for debate, it will happen and it will not be only one either, it most likely be the same number Archbishop Lefebvre used.
Deo Gratias and may this day promptly come. 
I heard that some of these "candidates" have worn red sashes whilst in Manila. If what was reported is true then I would ask if this was a hint on their part to be made bishops. I hope Bishop Williamson will make public the list of candidates, in the same way that banns are announced before a marriage, giving us faithful a chance to voice our concerns and objections.
That is ridiculous.
Who would be seeing their wardrobe anyhow -- the Faithful? How would this achieve the so-called "desired objective" -- it would have to be seen by a Bishop to do any good. Is it supposed to be some kind of subliminal message?
Anyhow, I don't know what your problem is with these holy priests, and I don't think I want to know. These priests are not the ambitious ones, or they would be accordistas. Saying Mass in garages and basements for a dozen or two Faithful is not the dream of ambitious priests.
If they become Bishops, I'm sure they'd take their responsibilities as seriously as they currently take their priesthood -- which is "very".
Your "allegation" is slanderous, but more importantly it holds no water, makes little sense, and has no credibility.
Red sashes are worn in the Indian missions:
(scroll down to the bottom to see some pictures)
http://www.cathinfo.com/catholic.php?a=topic&t=20605&min=15&num=5
Ok, this is my disturbing discovery for the day.
Not just AJNC, but TWO OTHER people thumbed down this post. I have no idea what's objectionable about it.
NOTE: I don't usually complain about thumbs down that I receive. Usually they are understandable, when I deal with a controversial topic. Remember the one about Dialogue Masses? I had no problem with that. I don't whine "Hey, who thumbed me down" because I find that quite annoying. Anyone should be able to take a bit of criticism.
In this case, however, I think it's pretty serious because I was just defending the good name of the Resistance priests against a rather ridiculous post/assertion!
Apparently THREE people think these Resistance priests are bad, ambitious, etc. and I'm not happy about that at all. It's the same feeling as when I discover I have another Accordista on the board! I usually have to do something about it.
It's not about "patience" or taking some hits to my pride, etc. -- it affects the direction of the board. That's why I say I often have to do something about it.
How about one or more of you REBUT what I said like a man, rather than anonymously thumbing it down like a coward. I can find out who you are anyhow, so might as well come clean.
Topic: Who Would Make A Good Resistance Bishop? (Read 4893 times)