Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Who is Fr. Albert O.P.?  (Read 4919 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline St Giles

  • Supporter
  • ***
  • Posts: 1704
  • Reputation: +880/-202
  • Gender: Male
Who is Fr. Albert O.P.?
« on: March 14, 2025, 11:59:31 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Who is he, where did he come from? As seen in the video of him preaching at STAS here https://www.cathinfo.com/general-discussion/spiritual-warfare-32057/msg976413/#msg976413
    "Be you therefore perfect, as also your heavenly Father is perfect."
    "Seek first the kingdom of Heaven..."
    "Every idle word that men shall speak, they shall render an account for it in the day of judgment"

    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 33416
    • Reputation: +29705/-615
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Who is Fr. Albert O.P.?
    « Reply #1 on: March 14, 2025, 01:02:14 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Who is he, where did he come from? As seen in the video of him preaching at STAS here https://www.cathinfo.com/general-discussion/spiritual-warfare-32057/msg976413/#msg976413

    He is no doubt descended from Adam, and from Japeth from the looks of him.

    He is a Dominican priest. I met him in the early 2000's while recording seminary conferences during the Priest Meetings. I fail to see where the confusion lies.
    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    My accounts (Paypal, Venmo) have been (((shut down))) PM me for how to donate and keep the forum going.


    Offline B from A

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1264
    • Reputation: +843/-135
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Who is Fr. Albert O.P.?
    « Reply #2 on: March 14, 2025, 01:09:23 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I think he was a Dominican from Avrillé, but separated from them years ago.  

    Offline KirklandWater

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 28
    • Reputation: +21/-1
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Who is Fr. Albert O.P.?
    « Reply #3 on: March 14, 2025, 01:22:51 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I think he was a Dominican from Avrillé, but separated from them years ago. 
    Now he lives with the Benedictines of Silver City. 
    Instaurare omnia in Christo

    Offline Twice dyed

    • Supporter
    • ***
    • Posts: 866
    • Reputation: +331/-32
    • Gender: Male
    • Violet, purple, and scarlet twice dyed. EX: 35, 6.
    Re: Who is Fr. Albert O.P.?
    « Reply #4 on: March 14, 2025, 01:49:42 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • https://fatima.org/author/fralbert/

    Father Albert Kallio, O.P.
    2 posts
    Father Albert Kallio, O.P. is a traditional Dominican priest. Originally from Canada, Father studied in Italy and France and was ordained in 1994. Since then he has traveled around the world, preaching and teaching, as well as writing for several publications. Since late 2013, he has been the superior of the traditional Dominicans in Steffeshausen, Belgium.


    *******
    He was brought up not far from Saskatoon, Saskatchewan.  He's been around missions in Canada since about 1980/ as layman or postulant. He offered mass in Canada for resistance group around 2014.
    If he would found something , a new Dominican monastery would be great in either Canada or USA. I'm sure young men would at least have a holy place to test their vocations. He's a great example of a monk- reserved, quiet, and radiates a religious attitude .
    +Lefebvre encouraged the establishment of monasteries etc.
    Please pray for Fr. Albert.
    The measure of love is to love without measure.
                                     St. Augustine (354 - 430 AD)


    Offline St Giles

    • Supporter
    • ***
    • Posts: 1704
    • Reputation: +880/-202
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Who is Fr. Albert O.P.?
    « Reply #5 on: March 14, 2025, 07:02:00 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Thanks, I was just wondering.
    "Be you therefore perfect, as also your heavenly Father is perfect."
    "Seek first the kingdom of Heaven..."
    "Every idle word that men shall speak, they shall render an account for it in the day of judgment"

    Offline andy

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 352
    • Reputation: +95/-52
    • Gender: Male

    Offline Incredulous

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 9561
    • Reputation: +9322/-1011
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Who is Fr. Albert O.P.?
    « Reply #7 on: March 14, 2025, 09:44:25 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0


  • Anyone recall this fiasco?   :popcorn:



    Response to an article on the SSPX-USA website

    An article called “A New Dominican Community” was published on October 24, 2014 on the SSPX USA web site1.  Here are the principle passages with some added commentary.
    It is interesting to note that on 24 October, the same day this article appeared, two Dominican Fathers from Avrillé arrived in the United States for a 15 day stay to visit the Dominican Tertiaries attached to the Avrillé friary. Two days later on 26 October, the SSPX District Superior of the United States. Fr. Wegner, sent a letter to all his priests and to all the Avrillé Tertiaries living in the United States, warning them against the Avrillé friary and asking the Avrillé Tertiaries to join the Steffeshausen Third Order.
    In his turn, on 31 October, Fr. Albert sent a letter to the Avrillé Tertiaries living in the United States, warning them against the Avrillé friary and asking the same Tertiaries to join his Third Order.
    The Avrillé Dominican Fathers

    Start of the article appearing on the SSPX-USA web site:
    A New Dominican Community

    Quote

    Quote
    “Find out about a new traditional religious community, the Dominican Friars of Steffeshausen, Belgium, and see how you can help them… or even join the Third Order of St. Dominic.
    video has just been posted about a new foundation of traditional Dominican friars in Belgium and the Third Order that they are offering to the faithful.
    This new community of traditional Dominican friars was founded on November 15, 2013 in Steffeshausen, a little village in the southeast corner of Belgium. They were invited there by the villagers after the death of their parish priest, who had kept the traditional Mass and was persecuted by his bishop some 25 years ago.
    They offered the church and rectory built by this priest to these friars as a first home for their fledgling community.”

    Our Commentary: The Steffeshausen house was not offered to these four priests, but to the Avrillé Dominicans.  Here are the facts:
    On 26 January 2013, during a meeting in Suresnes, in the presence of Fr. de Cacqueray [then District Superior of France], Bishop Fellay asked the Avrillé Dominicans to bring together five “vagus” Dominicans (all perpetually professed to the Avrillé friary) in a house which would be under the jurisdiction of Avrillé. That day, Bishop Fellay promised to support that foundation with his authority and to tell the religious who would refuse to submit that they must remove the habit or they would no longer be recognized as Dominicans by the Society of St. Pius X.
    The Avrillé Dominicans accepted this decision. A committee of lay people who were taking care of the house of Steffeshausen contacted the Avrillé Dominicans early February 2013 offering to hand over this house, so the fathers proposed to Bishop Fellay that the foundation be made there. The bishop accepted, and contacted the five religious to offer to install them in this house.
    However, in June 2013, Bishop de Galarreta told Avrillé that it was he who would take this foundation under his authority. When the fathers told him that Bishop Fellay had promised that the foundation would be instituted under the authority of Avrillé, Bishop de Galarreta answered, “Bishop Fellay considers himself to be relieved of his promise.” He declined to comment further and referred to Bishop Fellay. Father Prior of Avrillé then wrote three letters to Bishop Fellay on 14 July, 26 July and 11 August 2013 (the last of which was personally delivered by Fr. de Cacqueray) asking for explanations— he has never received a response.
    The SSPX article continues:
    Quote
    Quote
    “Bishop Alfonso de Galarreta, who assists those religious communities affiliated with the SSPX, accepted to help the foundation as its ecclesiastical superior. You can help the Dominicans by making a donation . . . On their behalf, thank you very much for your support!”

    (End of the text from the web site of the SSPX-USA.)
    Our Commentary: 
    The Dominican Order, which is an exempt Order, has never been put under the jurisdiction of a bishop.
    What’s more, being a bishop without jurisdiction, Bishop de Galaretta’s action of removing the five religious from their legitimate superior, without that superior’s agreement, is an illegitimate act and indicates a schismatic mentality by attributing to the bishops consecrated by Archbishop Lefebvre a jurisdiction they do not have and which Archbishop Lefebvre never wanted to give to them because he himself did not have it, as he so often said.
    In the video presented with this article, Fr. Albert recounts his history and very rapidly skims over the 19 years of his life that he spent with “some traditional Dominicans in France,” omitting to say that he was a part of the Avrillé community, that he studied there, that he received all his ecclesiastical orders from as a member of this community and that he made a vow of perpetual obedience between the hands of the prior of Avrillé. He also forgets to tell that he was sent to the United States in 2006 by his superiors in Avrillé, on the recommendation of Bishop Fellay, and that afterwards he refused to return to the Avrillé friary where his superiors still wait for him. He also keeps quiet about the situation of the four other religious, all perpetually professed to Avrillé, of whom three left the friary in the middle of the night of 11-12 April 2011 with the complicity of the German SSPX District Superior, Fr. Franz Schmidberger. There are many lapses of memory and much silence in the telling of this tale.
    This foundation, made on dishonesty and disobedience, is a violation of religious law.
    But above all, in the current context, it is a maneuver by Menzingen to weaken the Avrillé community and to have a nice, happy community of Menzingen Dominicans, who neither bark nor bite.
    1 — http://sspx.org/en/news-events/news/new-dominican-community-5298.
    2 — http://sspx.org/en/media/video/new-dominican-community-third-order-5297.




    Offline Mr G

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2346
    • Reputation: +1520/-90
    • Thanks! title=Thanks! No Thanks! title=No Thanks!
    • Gender: Male
      • View Profile title=View Profile
      • Personal Message (Offline)




    "Some preachers will keep silence about the truth, and others will trample it underfoot and deny it. Sanctity of life will be held in derision even by those who outwardly profess it, for in those days Our Lord Jesus Christ will send them not a true Pastor but a destroyer."  St. Francis of Assisi


    Offline Twice dyed

    • Supporter
    • ***
    • Posts: 866
    • Reputation: +331/-32
    • Gender: Male
    • Violet, purple, and scarlet twice dyed. EX: 35, 6.
    Re: Who is Fr. Albert O.P.?
    « Reply #8 on: March 14, 2025, 11:06:00 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Thanks for posting this concise article (s). In 2012-14 events like this were commonplace. In these writings, there is a hint at what was an unthinkable manoever...we'll never know the complete history. When I realized that neoSspx was in fact rewriting the Dominican Constitution, the term "illegitimate" is not sufficient! The bishops involved, and Fr. S. have zero jurisdiction. If those leaders cannot read Canon Law 1917, or 1984, little wonder they co-habitated with a N.O. " bishop"  named Huonder.
    Does anyone know the names of the "resistant leaning" monks now in Avrillé? They teach some seminarians of SAJM. I admire their web page for so many worthwhile articles.




    The measure of love is to love without measure.
                                     St. Augustine (354 - 430 AD)

    Offline Twice dyed

    • Supporter
    • ***
    • Posts: 866
    • Reputation: +331/-32
    • Gender: Male
    • Violet, purple, and scarlet twice dyed. EX: 35, 6.
    Re: Who are Carmelites of Most Holy Trinity, Texas
    « Reply #9 on: March 22, 2025, 05:43:34 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0

  • Anyone recall this fiasco?  :popcorn:



    Response to an article on the SSPX-USA website

    An article called “A New Dominican Community” was published on October 24, 2014 on the SSPX USA web site1.  Here are the principle passages with some added commentary.
    It is interesting to note that on 24 October, the same day this article appeared, two Dominican Fathers from Avrillé arrived in the United States for a 15 day stay to visit the Dominican Tertiaries attached to the Avrillé friary. Two days later on 26 October, the SSPX District Superior of the United States. Fr. Wegner, sent a letter to all his priests and to all the Avrillé Tertiaries living in the United States, warning them against the Avrillé friary and asking the Avrillé Tertiaries to join the Steffeshausen Third Order.
    In his turn, on 31 October, Fr. Albert sent a letter to the Avrillé Tertiaries living in the United States, warning them against the Avrillé friary and asking the same Tertiaries to join his Third Order.
    The Avrillé Dominican Fathers

    Start of the article appearing on the SSPX-USA web site:
    A New Dominican Community

    Quote

    Our Commentary: The Steffeshausen house was not offered to these four priests, but to the Avrillé Dominicans.  Here are the facts:
    On 26 January 2013, during a meeting in Suresnes, in the presence of Fr. de Cacqueray [then District Superior of France], Bishop Fellay asked the Avrillé Dominicans to bring together five “vagus” Dominicans (all perpetually professed to the Avrillé friary) in a house which would be under the jurisdiction of Avrillé. That day, Bishop Fellay promised to support that foundation with his authority and to tell the religious who would refuse to submit that they must remove the habit or they would no longer be recognized as Dominicans by the Society of St. Pius X.
    The Avrillé Dominicans accepted this decision. A committee of lay people who were taking care of the house of Steffeshausen contacted the Avrillé Dominicans early February 2013 offering to hand over this house, so the fathers proposed to Bishop Fellay that the foundation be made there. The bishop accepted, and contacted the five religious to offer to install them in this house.
    However, in June 2013, Bishop de Galarreta told Avrillé that it was he who would take this foundation under his authority. When the fathers told him that Bishop Fellay had promised that the foundation would be instituted under the authority of Avrillé, Bishop de Galarreta answered, “Bishop Fellay considers himself to be relieved of his promise.” He declined to comment further and referred to Bishop Fellay. Father Prior of Avrillé then wrote three letters to Bishop Fellay on 14 July, 26 July and 11 August 2013 (the last of which was personally delivered by Fr. de Cacqueray) asking for explanations— he has never received a response.
    The SSPX article continues:
    Quote
    (End of the text from the web site of the SSPX-USA.)
    Our Commentary:
    The Dominican Order, which
      • Personal Message (Offline)
    I hadn't heard this new jurisdiction for the neoSspx on a Carmel, in Texas. These nuns reject the  N.O. " bishop", but now the neoSsp will govern them!!??? Where on God's green earth does the neoSsp have jurisdiction??
    The answer is  NOWHERE!
    All their clergy are 'vagus' , meaning they are simply wandering priests, using state of emergency for the sacraments, personal...like one on one. But when you read the FIASCO post above, neo Ssp are getting even more careless. Am I wrong?
    *******

    Quote from above...Incred.
    Our Commentary:

    The Dominican Order, which is an exempt Order, has never been put under the jurisdiction of a bishop.
    What’s more, being a bishop without jurisdiction, Bishop de Galaretta’s action of removing the five..."
    *****
    http://www.carmelnuns.com/
    "...of the Church. In our desire to grow in holiness and an ever deeper fidelity to our Discalced Carmelite charism, and as an appropriate means to better serve Our Holy Mother the Church, in August, following the unanimous decision of the Chapter of the Monastery, and with the agreement of the whole community, we completed the final steps necessary for our Monastery to be associated with the Society of Saint Pius X, who will henceforth assure our ongoing sacramental life and governance. We are profoundly grateful to the Very Reverend Father Superior General and to his delegates here in the USA for their paternal understanding and welcome.

    The motto of Pope St. Pius X was: To Restore All Things in Christ. Such is the case for our Community as well....:"

    The measure of love is to love without measure.
                                     St. Augustine (354 - 430 AD)

    Offline Clare67

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 48
    • Reputation: +48/-2
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Who is Fr. Albert O.P.?
    « Reply #10 on: March 22, 2025, 06:35:40 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • As you stated, Twice Dyed, the SSPX has no jurisdiction whatsoever to assume "governance" of this monastery, which no longer exists.  These nuns have been dismissed from the religious life (see official decree linked below from the Diocese of Fort Worth) and the monastery suppressed.  They are now lay women playing "dress up."  

    https://fwdioc.org/bpolson-pastoral-letter-to-faithful-of-diocese-holy-see-decree-of-suppression-12-2-24-en.pdf

    Now, the SSPX claims to "recognize" the Pope and the Magisterium, which means, in theory at least, they recognize the legitimate authority of said Magisterium in the Office of the Dicastery for Institutes of Consecrated Life and Societies of Apostolic Life  to order the suppression of this monastery and dismiss these ladies from the consecrated life.  But the reality is the SSPX does not recognize any authority except their own.  

    It must be admitted, and the above example shows quite clearly, that the actions of the SSPX and "recognize and resist" in general are completely schizophrenic to say the least.   It's nuts.