Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Who else should be banned?  (Read 6078 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline SeanJohnson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15064
  • Reputation: +9980/-3161
  • Gender: Male
Who else should be banned?
« on: August 19, 2018, 07:43:25 AM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!16
  • 1) All sede-anything’s

    2) All Feeneyites 

    3) Anyone lobbying for “tolerance” of either of these.

    4) Anyone promoting an anti-Resistance agenda.

    5) Pfeifferites.

    The above sects should be allowed to view discussions, but not post.
    Rom 5: 20 - "But where sin increased, grace abounded all the more."


    Offline Last Tradhican

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6293
    • Reputation: +3327/-1937
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Who else should be banned?
    « Reply #1 on: August 19, 2018, 08:40:35 AM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!2
  • For me, people with opposing views are a valuable aid that forces me to really learn a subject. 

    Anyone that knows anything about baseball, knows that Babe Ruth was the greatest home run hitter, and the greatest hitter of all time. But what most do not know is that Babe Ruth has the record for striking out the most. If you don't swing for the fences you won't strike out as much, but, you will also not hit home runs.

    If you get rid of, avoid every differing opinion, you will never learn anything new. There's a reason why God allows heresies, and that is it.
    The Vatican II church - Assisting Souls to Hell Since 1962

    For there shall arise false Christs and false prophets, and shall show great signs and wonders, insomuch as to deceive (if possible) even the elect. Mat 24:24


    Offline SeanJohnson

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 15064
    • Reputation: +9980/-3161
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Who else should be banned?
    « Reply #2 on: August 19, 2018, 08:53:10 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!9
  • God allows heresy as a punishment, not a learning opportunity.

    Luther, Calvin, Henry VIII, and Zwingli had “opinions,” and took 2/3 of Europe to hell with them.

    This idea that putting truth and error on the same footing is required for “fairness” (or any other reason) is pure liberal infection, and those advocating it are promoting a Masonic principle.

    In the seminary, we were not even allowed to read the works of heretics in the library’s “hell” section without cause and permission.

    Nor is the Index explicable but for good old-fashioned Catholic intolerance.
    Rom 5: 20 - "But where sin increased, grace abounded all the more."

    Offline Last Tradhican

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6293
    • Reputation: +3327/-1937
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Who else should be banned?
    « Reply #3 on: August 19, 2018, 09:07:11 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!2
  • God allows heresy as a punishment, not a learning opportunity.

    Luther, Calvin, Henry VIII, and Zwingli had “opinions,” and took 2/3 of Europe to hell with them.

    This idea that putting truth and error on the same footing is required for “fairness” (or any other reason) is pure liberal infection, and those advocating it are promoting a Masonic principle.

    In the seminary, we were not even allowed to read the works of heretics in the library’s “hell” section without cause and permission.

    Nor is the Index explicable but for good old-fashioned Catholic intolerance.
    None of the subjects that you listed are heresies, except to you. The sedes can't prove absolutely that they are correct and neither can the R&R's. Even your belief that Jєωs, Mohamedans, Hindus, Buddhists etc can be saved by their belief in a God that rewards (that people can be saved without a real desire to be baptized or be a Catholic, nor belief in the Incarnation and the Holy Trinity) has not been declared a heresy. Your belief is the pilar of World Day of Religions at Assisi and the reason for Vatican II, yet it has not been declared a heresy, same as Vatican II.
    The Vatican II church - Assisting Souls to Hell Since 1962

    For there shall arise false Christs and false prophets, and shall show great signs and wonders, insomuch as to deceive (if possible) even the elect. Mat 24:24

    Offline Admin

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 232
    • Reputation: +95/-0
    • Gender: Male
      • CathInfo
    Re: Who else should be banned?
    « Reply #4 on: August 19, 2018, 09:10:44 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • That is a red herring. Or more accurately, tilting at windmills. I Don't allow heresy on CI.

    Disputed matters touching on the crisis in the Church is another matter. Prudence and opinion are not matters of dogma.
    Want to say "thank you"?
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    Paypal: matthew@chantcd.com


    Offline SeanJohnson

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 15064
    • Reputation: +9980/-3161
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Who else should be banned?
    « Reply #5 on: August 19, 2018, 09:11:26 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!8
  • Hmm, I can’t understand why a Feeneyite doesn’t like my post.
    Rom 5: 20 - "But where sin increased, grace abounded all the more."

    Offline SeanJohnson

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 15064
    • Reputation: +9980/-3161
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Who else should be banned?
    « Reply #6 on: August 19, 2018, 09:15:43 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!8
  • That is a red herring. Or more accurately, tilting at windmills. I Don't allow heresy on CI.

    Disputed matters touching on the crisis in the Church is another matter. Prudence and opinion are not matters of dogma.

    It was shown that implicit baptism of desire is De Fide.

    It is also clear that a popeless Church for 60 years mitigates indefectability.

    To brush that aside and pretend these are just “disputed matters” will require some explaining at the Judgment.
    Rom 5: 20 - "But where sin increased, grace abounded all the more."

    Offline Matto

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6882
    • Reputation: +3849/-406
    • Gender: Male
    • Love God and Play, Do Good Work and Pray
    Re: Who else should be banned?
    « Reply #7 on: August 19, 2018, 09:17:56 AM »
  • Thanks!17
  • No Thanks!4
  • I propose the banning of Sean Johnson. I think he deserves to be banned for his avatar alone and I am tired of his crusades to get half the forum banned. Now he can lop off my head for being a heretic.
    R.I.P.
    Please pray for the repose of my soul.


    Offline SeanJohnson

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 15064
    • Reputation: +9980/-3161
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Who else should be banned?
    « Reply #8 on: August 19, 2018, 09:25:06 AM »
  • Thanks!3
  • No Thanks!11
  • I propose the banning of Sean Johnson. I think he deserves to be banned for his avatar alone and I am tired of his crusades to get half the forum banned. Now he can lop off my head for being a heretic.

    Never had a fear of the ban button.

    In fact, it might clarify matters, given my strict personal identification with the Resistance:

    It would send an unmistakable message to the world that CI is certainly no resistance forum (which is actually a minority position here anyway), but an ecuмenical gathering point where anyone who thinks himself traditional can toss ideas to the wind).
    Rom 5: 20 - "But where sin increased, grace abounded all the more."

    Offline forlorn

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2449
    • Reputation: +964/-1098
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Who else should be banned?
    « Reply #9 on: August 19, 2018, 09:27:20 AM »
  • Thanks!4
  • No Thanks!2
  • 2) All Feeneyites
    Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus. 

    Offline roscoe

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 7611
    • Reputation: +617/-404
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Who else should be banned?
    « Reply #10 on: August 19, 2018, 11:07:45 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!3
  • There is NO SUCH THING as a "Feeneyite"... :sleep:
    There Is No Such Thing As 'Sede Vacantism'...
    nor is there such thing as a 'Feeneyite' or 'Feeneyism'


    Offline ignatius

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 61
    • Reputation: +82/-207
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Who else should be banned?
    « Reply #11 on: August 19, 2018, 11:18:59 AM »
  • Thanks!3
  • No Thanks!3
  • Never had a fear of the ban button.

    In fact, it might clarify matters, given my strict personal identification with the Resistance:

    It would send an unmistakable message to the world that CI is certainly no resistance forum (which is actually a minority position here anyway), but an ecuмenical gathering point where anyone who thinks himself traditional can toss ideas to the wind).
    How is it you have a strict personal identification with the Resistance when you are still involved and active helping the neo sspx apostolate at the same time?  Indulters are not exactly strict are they.


    ps,
    unfortunately you got a like hit when I meant to hit the quote button

    Offline SeanJohnson

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 15064
    • Reputation: +9980/-3161
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Who else should be banned?
    « Reply #12 on: August 19, 2018, 11:41:26 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!8
  • How is it you have a strict personal identification with the Resistance when you are still involved and active helping the neo sspx apostolate at the same time?  Indulters are not exactly strict are they.


    ps,
    unfortunately you got a like hit when I meant to hit the quote button

    Whoops, thanks for reminding me:

    6) All Flatheads
    Rom 5: 20 - "But where sin increased, grace abounded all the more."

    Offline roscoe

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 7611
    • Reputation: +617/-404
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Who else should be banned?
    « Reply #13 on: August 19, 2018, 11:47:44 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!1
  • I propose the banning of Sean Johnson. I think he deserves to be banned for his avatar alone and I am tired of his crusades to get half the forum banned. Now he can lop off my head for being a heretic.
    Very true-- Avatar of SJ is from CONDEMNED  Knights Templar. This is Pope Clem V speaking-- not moi. :fryingpan:
    There Is No Such Thing As 'Sede Vacantism'...
    nor is there such thing as a 'Feeneyite' or 'Feeneyism'

    Offline Pax Vobis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 10311
    • Reputation: +6220/-1742
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Who else should be banned?
    « Reply #14 on: August 19, 2018, 12:02:47 PM »
  • Thanks!11
  • No Thanks!1
  • Once upon a time, Sean Johnson started a catholic forum, but once he banned everyone that disagreed with him, he was left with only himself, so he changed the name of the site to a blog.  Then he could only read what he wrote. And he lived happily ever after.  The end.