In which case, you have necessarily just graduated to full sedevacantism.
About time you got off the fence (but unfortunate you fell down the wrong side).
Nope, still a sede-doubtist. My judgment regarding the harmfulness of the Mass comes from human judgment. That is in fact part of this syllogism.
Major: Pope cannot impose a harmful Rite of Mass.
Minor: NOM is a harmful Rite of Mass.
Minor: Bergoglio imposed the NOM.
Conclusion: Bergoglio is not the pope.
Minor #2 above is no longer debatable. But the assessment regarding the harmfulness of the NOM is based on my human judgment.
You've been on the side of blasphemy and heresy, Johnson. You need to either admit that the NOM may not be harmful or you need to admit that Bergoglio is might not be the pope. But insisting on BOTH, that the NOM is harmful and that Bergoglio is the legitimate pope, that's both heresy and blasphemy.