Author Topic: Where is Fr. Roland de Merode? (Read 6667 times)

InDominoSperavi · « **Reply #10 on:** December 04, 2014, 12:59:05 PM »

Yes, I am the one condemned by Fr Chazal. it is a misunderstanding. I am working to solve it. it is about the regulation of birth and Pius XII. Fr Chazal thinks I am a liberal. You will have news about that subject in the end of december or in January. Fr Chazal and I will publish something and everybody will know if we are reconciled or if I am still condemned by Fr Chazal. We are going to study in every detail the doctrine of the church about the subject this month. We both want to do God's will. I appreciate a lot Fr Chazal... Pray that we get reconciled, please. For the moment, I prefer not to speak further on the subject, till our study is not finished.

For Abp Lefebvre I explained everything in details here :http://aveclimmaculee.blogspot.fr/p/voici-quelques-citations-de-la-lettre.html
Abp Lefebvre did not condemned the principle of making a practical deal with Rome, after the consecration of the 4 bishops in 1988. I give disurbing quotes. Some priests congratulated me. other condemned me for this article.

The declaration of France fidèle condemns the initial position of the Resistance saying that it is "risky" to wait for the conversion of Rome. They say it is a "waiting game of a statu quo without any outcome" It is very dangerous and nobody dares to tell something because if they say so, they are on my side. And it is impossible to agree with me and to be politically correct, since my condemnation by Fr Chazal... So because everybody is afraid to show he is with me, it is the silence. And through Fr Pivert (cf. here) and this declaration, the accordist ideas enter the Resistance.

InDominoSperavi · « **Reply #11 on:** December 04, 2014, 02:40:07 PM »

I have just learnt something new, today, about Fr de Merode, on the new website that France fidèle is building. They say he is a friend of the USML but not in the USML. It is on this page.
When I went on the website this afternoon, they had not yet copied the bad declaration on it. They let it on the old website. But the new website is still in process of building... I will be interested in seeing if they copy or not this declaration. Anyway, I have asked they condemn it explicitly. We asked Bp Fellay to condemn his April 15th declaration, so we must ask them to condemn their bad declaration. The church always does that : when a error which is dangerous is published, a public condemnation is needed.

Francisco · « **Reply #12 on:** December 04, 2014, 11:42:48 PM »

Quote from: InDominoSperavi

Yes, I am the one condemned by Fr Chazal. it is a misunderstanding. I am working to solve it. it is about the regulation of birth and Pius XII. Fr Chazal thinks I am a liberal. You will have news about that subject in the end of december or in January. Fr Chazal and I will publish something and everybody will know if we are reconciled or if I am still condemned by Fr Chazal. We are going to study in every detail the doctrine of the church about the subject this month. We both want to do God's will. I appreciate a lot Fr Chazal... Pray that we get reconciled, please. For the moment, I prefer not to speak further on the subject, till our study is not finished.

For Abp Lefebvre I explained everything in details here :http://aveclimmaculee.blogspot.fr/p/voici-quelques-citations-de-la-lettre.html
Abp Lefebvre did not condemned the principle of making a practical deal with Rome, after the consecration of the 4 bishops in 1988. I give disurbing quotes. Some priests congratulated me. other condemned me for this article.

The declaration of France fidèle condemns the initial position of the Resistance saying that it is "risky" to wait for the conversion of Rome. They say it is a "waiting game of a statu quo without any outcome" It is very dangerous and nobody dares to tell something because if they say so, they are on my side. And it is impossible to agree with me and to be politically correct, since my condemnation by Fr Chazal... So because everybody is afraid to show he is with me, it is the silence. And through Fr Pivert (cf. here) and this declaration, the accordist ideas enter the Resistance.

Perhaps you can also discuss with Fr Chazal the following statement he made in his India-Australasia Report of September 2013:

"Interestingly, we have a clear case of marriage annulment in Bombay, a first in the resistance, if it happens. The novus ordo hesitates, because one of the spouses excluded the procreation of children, and that is not sufficient ground for them. That s typical of the new Code".
http://www.sspx-mariancorps.com/blog/category/india

In your last post you say that Fr de Merode is not with the USML but is a friend of it. Wasn't he elected to be the leader of the USML?

hugeman · « **Reply #13 on:** December 05, 2014, 12:09:36 AM »

Quote from: John Steven

Quote from: Ferdinand

Menzingen Troll Alert!

Sedevacantist Troll Alert!

Oh no--troll alerts are for people pretending to be what they are not. Troll alerts shouldn't be used for persons who clearly state their positions--regardless how unpopular. The purpose of a troll alert is to warn other, unsuspecting readers that the enemy is near, and he's as disarming as a friend. But don't turn around !

InDominoSperavi · « **Reply #14 on:** December 05, 2014, 10:31:14 AM »

Thank you, hugeman. I am one of the first who supported Fr Chazal and Pfeiffer in France, in 2012. I opened my website avec l'Immaculée to support them in september 2012 because Gentiloup was not happy with me on the forum un évêque s'est levé. I was too much supporting the external resistance for her.
About the question on marriage annulment, I will look in my catechism for the reference but Fr Chazal is right.
Yes, Fr de Merode was elected but he changed his mind soon after and it is Fr Bruno OSB who was elected after that...