Author Topic: Whats wrong with this picture? (Read 10437 times)

sspxbvm · « **on:** June 07, 2013, 12:06:36 PM »

Where oh where is an image of His Excellency, Bishop Williamson? Isn't this occasion for his 25th anniversary???

There could have been a swap of images but because of the likely aggressive response I'll let you all figure it out for yourselves!!

Militia Jesu · « **Reply #1 on:** June 07, 2013, 01:21:08 PM »

For goodness sake, lady... Go find some dishes to wash or something.

Machabees · « **Reply #2 on:** June 07, 2013, 02:30:20 PM »

What is wrong with this picture?

See the hailing of the "Reflections on 25th anniversary of 1988 Consecration" on the ssspx.org photograph of the bishops 1988 consecrations -Bishop Williamson- in not shown! Only the other three.

http://www.sspx.org/superior_generals_news/reflections_on_25th_anniversary_of_1988_consecrations.htm

Out of all of the SSPX archived photographs that the sspx.org has of the consecrations, they purposely chose to "defunct" Bishop Williamson.

These people are dreadful...

tmw89 · « **Reply #3 on:** June 07, 2013, 03:08:51 PM »

Quote from: Machabees

What is wrong with this picture?

See the hailing of the "Reflections on 25th anniversary of 1988 Consecration" on the ssspx.org photograph of the bishops 1988 consecrations -Bishop Williamson- in not shown! Only the other three.

http://www.sspx.org/superior_generals_news/reflections_on_25th_anniversary_of_1988_consecrations.htm

Out of all of the SSPX archived photographs that the sspx.org has of the consecrations, they purposely chose to "defunct" Bishop Williamson.

These people are dreadful...

Wow! This is only a notch above plain doctoring +Williamson out of old photos altogether, a la Stalin's methodology (remember? see here and here).

Matthew · « **Reply #4 on:** June 07, 2013, 06:38:41 PM »

Quote from: sspxbvm

Where oh where is an image of His Excellency, Bishop Williamson? Isn't this occasion for his 25th anniversary???

There could have been a swap of images but because of the likely aggressive response I'll let you all figure it out for yourselves!!

I think you're on to something.

Why display Archbishop Lefebvre and Fr. Pfeiffer, in a poster about the anniversary of the EPISCOPAL CONSECRATIONS?

No offense to the good Father, but what does he have to do with the 1988 Consecrations? +Lefebvre I can understand, and Our Lady I can understand. They were both involved.

Is this some kind of subtle, subliminal suggestion?

So the neo-SSPX doesn't show Bishop Williamson, and the Resistance doesn't either!

No wonder +W is discouraged. Both friends and enemies are trying to bury him.

s2srea · « **Reply #5 on:** June 07, 2013, 06:41:22 PM »

Quote from: Matthew

Quote from: sspxbvm
Where oh where is an image of His Excellency, Bishop Williamson? Isn't this occasion for his 25th anniversary???

There could have been a swap of images but because of the likely aggressive response I'll let you all figure it out for yourselves!!

I think you're on to something.

Why display Archbishop Lefebvre and Fr. Pfeiffer, in a poster about the anniversary of the EPISCOPAL CONSECRATIONS?

No offense to the good Father, but what does he have to do with the 1988 Consecrations? +Lefebvre I can understand, and Our Lady I can understand. They were both involved.

Is this some kind of subtle, subliminal suggestion?

So the neo-SSPX doesn't show Bishop Williamson, and the Resistance doesn't either!

No wonder +W is discouraged. Both friends and enemies are trying to bury him.

No offense to Fr. Pfieffer indeed; but it seems as if some of his supporters are a bit over the top with him in some regards....

Telesphorus · « **Reply #6 on:** June 07, 2013, 06:45:05 PM »

It's a poorly made and thought out graphic. Not worth complaining about.

It is of very minor significance. Is it a pablo production?

Machabees · « **Reply #7 on:** June 07, 2013, 07:09:10 PM »

Quote from: Matthew

Quote from: sspxbvm
Where oh where is an image of His Excellency, Bishop Williamson? Isn't this occasion for his 25th anniversary???

There could have been a swap of images but because of the likely aggressive response I'll let you all figure it out for yourselves!!

I think you're on to something.

Why display Archbishop Lefebvre and Fr. Pfeiffer, in a poster about the anniversary of the EPISCOPAL CONSECRATIONS?

No offense to the good Father, but what does he have to do with the 1988 Consecrations? +Lefebvre I can understand, and Our Lady I can understand. They were both involved.

Is this some kind of subtle, subliminal suggestion?

So the neo-SSPX doesn't show Bishop Williamson, and the Resistance doesn't either!

No wonder +W is discouraged. Both friends and enemies are trying to bury him.

Look who the poster is made from...pablo the mexican Productions!

It is no wonder, Pablo has stated many times that he has an ax to grind with Bishop Williamson.

SeanJohnson · « **Reply #8 on:** June 07, 2013, 07:15:40 PM »

Quote from: s2srea

Quote from: Matthew
Quote from: sspxbvm
Where oh where is an image of His Excellency, Bishop Williamson? Isn't this occasion for his 25th anniversary???

There could have been a swap of images but because of the likely aggressive response I'll let you all figure it out for yourselves!!

I think you're on to something.

Why display Archbishop Lefebvre and Fr. Pfeiffer, in a poster about the anniversary of the EPISCOPAL CONSECRATIONS?

No offense to the good Father, but what does he have to do with the 1988 Consecrations? +Lefebvre I can understand, and Our Lady I can understand. They were both involved.

Is this some kind of subtle, subliminal suggestion?

So the neo-SSPX doesn't show Bishop Williamson, and the Resistance doesn't either!

No wonder +W is discouraged. Both friends and enemies are trying to bury him.

No offense to Fr. Pfieffer indeed; but it seems as if some of his supporters are a bit over the top with him in some regards....

Agreed.

Machabees · « **Reply #9 on:** June 07, 2013, 07:17:18 PM »

Quote from: Machabees

Quote from: Machabees
Quote from: Matthew
Quote from: sspxbvm
Where oh where is an image of His Excellency, Bishop Williamson? Isn't this occasion for his 25th anniversary???

There could have been a swap of images but because of the likely aggressive response I'll let you all figure it out for yourselves!!

I think you're on to something.

Why display Archbishop Lefebvre and Fr. Pfeiffer, in a poster about the anniversary of the EPISCOPAL CONSECRATIONS?

No offense to the good Father, but what does he have to do with the 1988 Consecrations? +Lefebvre I can understand, and Our Lady I can understand. They were both involved.

Is this some kind of subtle, subliminal suggestion?

So the neo-SSPX doesn't show Bishop Williamson, and the Resistance doesn't either!

No wonder +W is discouraged. Both friends and enemies are trying to bury him.

Look who the poster is made from...pablo the Amateur Exorcist Productions!

It is no wonder, Pablo has stated many times that he has an ax to grind with Bishop Williamson.

Why is it when I typed in: "pablo the Amateur Exorcist productions", then hit reply to make a new post, the post takes it away and puts in: "pablo the the Amateur Exorcist Productions"?

There it did it again.

I had repeatedly typed in P-a-b-l-o T-h-e M-e-x-i-c-a-n P-r-o-d-u-t-i-o-n-s with many EDITS, and it still comes out: "pablo the Amateur Exorcist productions".

???

I just added the dashes between the letters this time to see if anything would happen. Lets see if the dashes will work?

MaterDominici · « **Reply #10 on:** June 07, 2013, 11:03:24 PM »

That's called re-branding. :wink:

Real answer: Matthew set the software to automatically change it.

Lighthouse · « **Reply #11 on:** June 07, 2013, 11:15:09 PM »

Yes, and might I observe that "who" cannot replace "who". Who can only replace "whom".

:soapbox:

1st Mansion Tenant · « **Reply #12 on:** June 08, 2013, 12:17:25 AM »

Am I misunderstanding? Can you guys seriously not figure out who's missing and why?

AJNC · « **Reply #13 on:** June 08, 2013, 12:31:06 AM »

Quote from: 1st Mansion Tenant

Am I misunderstanding? Can you guys seriously not figure out who's missing and why?

Let me guess. Bishop Williamson is missing because he didn't consecrate Fr Joseph Pfeiffer bishop? Bur didn't Pablo say somewhere that a bishop in Rome was going to do the needful?

s2srea · « **Reply #14 on:** June 08, 2013, 10:05:15 AM »

Quote from: AJNC

Quote from: 1st Mansion Tenant
Am I misunderstanding? Can you guys seriously not figure out who's missing and why?

Let me guess. Bishop Williamson is missing because he didn't consecrate Fr Joseph Pfeiffer bishop? Bur didn't Pablo say somewhere that a bishop in Rome was going to do the needful?

This is really concerning. Again, I hope that those supporters of Fr. Pfeiffer do not create the severely unneeded impression that Fr. Pfeiffer is in line with their line of thought on what his own aspirations are. I do not know Fr. Pfeiffer personally, but from what I've read and seen of him as of recent, I do not see him puffing himself up in any way. He seems holy, and I can only imagine him being at odds with some of the ways he's presented.