Whats wrong with this picture? Just this, the pitfalls of the h0Ɩ0h0αx and pragmatism. Comments after quote from Bishop Williamson.

This weeks Eleison Comments:

Number CCCL (350)
    
29th March 2014
SUBSTITUTE RELIGION

Two months ago a self-declared atheist celebrated in France his 85th birthday, to whom all theists of the true religion owe a serious debt of thanks, because in today’s world of lies Professor Robert Faurisson has been a powerful defender of truth. I for one might wish that many more believers in the true God would have his intelligence and honesty in discerning the truth, and his courage to tell it.

For instance, whether or not it is a historical fact that there were six million victims of gassing in gas chambers of the Third Reich, Prof. Faurisson insists on treating it as a historical question to be settled by the facts and scientific evidence, and not by emotion and legislation – what could be more reasonable ? And yet on this particular question a mass of our contemporaries will not listen to reason. Are their minds still functioning ? Our warm gratitude goes to the Professor for bringing an excellent and scholarly mind to bear on a historical question as a question of history and not of something else.

Something else ? Again, whether or not the Six Million are a historical reality, it is the Professor who states that they have in any case acquired the status of a secular religion. Does it take a supposedly irreligious man to discern what serves as the main religion of our times ? I might wish a few more Catholics would have the gumption to see and say what is today’s main rival to their true religion. Here is a very brief overview of an article written on the subject in 2008 by Professor Faurisson:--

The Six Million constitute a lay religion with its own dogma, commandments, decrees, prophets, high priests and Saints: St Anne (Frank), St Simon (Wiesenthal), St Elie (Wiesel). It has its holy places, its rituals and its pilgrimages. It has its temples and its relics (bars of soap, piles of shoes, etc.), its martyrs, heroes, miracles and miraculous survivors (millions of them), its golden legend and its righteous people. Auschwitz is its Golgotha, Hitler is its Satan. It dictates its law to the nations. Its heart beats in Jerusalem, at the Yad Veshem monument.

It is a new religion that has enjoyed a meteoric growth since World War II. It has conquered the West and is setting out to conquer the world. Whereas the progress of scientific thinking in our consumer society has weakened the grip of all the classic religions by making people more and more sceptical as to the truth of religion’s stories and the promises religion holds out, the new religion prospers to the point that anybody caught denying its basic dogma is branded as a “Revisionist”, is cast out of the community, and is treated like only heretics used to be treated. It is in effect a religion, and it is today a major instrument, and, one might say, the popular religion of the godless nєω ωσrℓ∂ σr∂єr.

The Professor argues that this success can be attributed to its resorting to the consumer society’s own techniques of advertising and selling. Here I think he does lack the religious perspective. Surely the apostasy of the once Christian nations is the main explanation. Christ is God. When God is pushed out, he leaves behind him a huge void which must be filled by something. The promoters of the new religion have by their history a matchless instinct for the fabrication of substitute religions. But be that as it may, I would invite believers to pray for the unbelieving Professor so that he may collect the divine reward which, humanly seen, he deserves for the heroic services which he has rendered to the truth.

Kyrie eleison.

The first problem is to even indicate that a declared atheist can possess truth opens the pandoras box to the whole of V2 gnostic 'all people and religions possess the truth.' If it were strictly limited to quoting Faurisson (who has neo-nαzι express leanings and connections) on technical physics of a non-speculative factual matter and that were used to discuss that only in that way, that would be acceptable in that matter only. But it is not limited in that fashion at all.

The gloss that "...I would invite believers to pray for the unbelieving Professor so that he may collect the divine reward which, humanly seen,..." doesn't reflect truth, for the very idea that "humanly seen" can lead to or merit reward from the ultimate truth of the True God is at best theistic creationism, Ratzinger et al, whereby man discovers truth by his own efforts and not by Divine Revelation - given the Valtorta nonsense, this is a pattern with Williamson. It is also the dictum of the Freemasonic Rosecrucians (which include the Satan worshipping Rothschilds) i.e. the fourth Rosecrucian commandment "Rule passion - faith - tradition and all things with tempered reason." see: Rosicrucian Manifesto

In total contradistinction to the above ideas, Our Lord Jesus Christ is the Truth and He reveals Himself by His own power and is accepted by faith, not discovered by human reason on its own. “John 1:13 Who are born, not of blood, nor of the will of flesh, nor of will of man, but of God.”

Gospel of St. John Chapter 1

12 But as many as received him, he gave to them power to be made the sons of God, to them that believe in his name.
13 Who are born, not of blood, nor of the will of flesh, nor of will of man, but of God.
14 *And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us: we saw his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth.
15 John beareth witness of him: and crieth out, saying: This was he of whom I spoke, He that shall come after me, is preferred before me, because he was before me.
16 *And of his fulness we all have received, and grace for grace.
17 For the law was given by Moses, grace and truth by Jesus Christ.
18 *No man hath seen God at any time: the only begotten Son who is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him.

From: Bishop Michel Louis Guérard des Lauriers (The Archbishop Thuc consecrations were valid – other than Archbishop Thuc there is only Archbishop Lefebvre – Gommar De Pauw was a shill for Antipope Paul VI; De Pauw was an earlier version of Fellay) – Father Guérard des Lauriers, O.P. was the author of The Ottaviani Intervention.

After Vatican II, Fr. Michel Louis Guérard des Lauriers, O.P. (1898 - 1988) was very concerned about the events taking place in the Church. In 1969 he was the primary ghost-writer who authored the famous Ottaviani Intervention, criticizing the new Mass.
From: http://www.traditioninaction.org/HotTopics/f045ht_Lauriers01.htm

The real resistance to V2 (Primarily 12 Cardinals, including Msgr. Ottaviani, and also others, Archbishop Lefebvre and others) was prior to and during the notorious V2 council of Satan and resulted in “The Plot Against the Church” (see: here) to warn of the Apostasy that was and is V2.

Fr. Guérard des Lauriers to Msgr. Lefèbvre: ‘You Act like Pontius Pilate’

Archbishop, We Do Not Want this Peace

Archbishop,

You were clear in your letter about the outlines of a protocol of agreement between Ecône and Rome: Ecône, which up until now we support; Rome, which we resist, just as you do.

The loyalty demanded by the service of the Truth obliges us to declare: We do not want this peace. It appears to be wise. It is, indeed, no more wise than Pilate pretended to be. Jesus was delivered to Pilate because He was accused of saying: “I am the King of the Jєωs” (John 19:21), whereas the Jєωs claimed to “have no other king than Cesar” (John 19: 15).

In reality, Jesus was not brought before Pilate for a royalty “whose origin is not of this world” (John 18: 36). And Jesus did not mean to die to conserve anything. He did not mean to die for anything except to “give testimony to the Truth” (John 14:6); regardless of appearances, it was Pilate who depended on Jesus rather than Jesus on Pilate. Your Excellency, you submit the Mass to the Pope because it disturbs the celebration of the “new mass” (as Paul VI called it), just as Jesus disturbed the Pharisaic order “by teaching throughout all Judea” (Luke 23:5).

IN REALITY, THE MASS SHOULD NOT BE SUBMITTED TO THE POPE, since the Pope must respect it. We want, with God’s grace, to testify to the Truth; we do not want a peace that “diminishes the Truth” (Psalm 11:2).



The Archbishop is compared to Pontius Pilate

Pilate resorts to expedients to save Jesus. He fails. Thrice he fails, in order to accentuate in a providential way that it is not possible to give testimony to the Truth unless one is in absolute accord with the Truth. Pilate thinks he can save Christ by having recourse to Herod. He is doubly fooled: by expecting Jesus to be saved by those who want His death and by “becoming the friend of Herod” (Luke 23: 12). It is a false unity, since it is a unity against the One who is the Truth.

Concerning the h0Ɩ0h0αx – it does not matter whether it happened or not in this regard: in either case the Jєωs are still GUILTY – the whole nation of them, of Deicide and Perfidy. Period. The fire they will justly suffer for eternity is infinitely worse than any supposed ovens of the nαzιs.