Here is the second article on Akita : you have at the end of the article some photos of Noah's ark, which has been visited in april 2010. In this article, the main part is about the flood. Akita has a false doctrine about this event. It make people believe that more than 8 people were saved. And it is of faith to say that only 8 people survived (I checked that with two priests of the resistance). So when Akita says that the great Chastisement will be worse than the flood, it is a lie. Details and explanations in the article.
http://aveclimmaculee.blogspot.fr/2013/11/ii-que-penser-des-apparitions-dakita_16.html

Here is the second article on Akita : you have at the end of the article some photos of Noah's ark, which has been visited in april 2010. In this article, the main part is about the flood. Akita has a false doctrine about this event. It [makes] people believe that more than 8 people were saved. And it is of faith to say that only 8 people survived (I checked that with two priests of the resistance). So when Akita says that the great Chastisement will be worse than the flood, it is a lie. Details and explanations in the article.
http://aveclimmaculee.blogspot.fr/2013/11/ii-que-penser-des-apparitions-dakita_16.html

Akita doesn't "make people believe" anything. It's just an apparition.  
Oh, one that was approved by the local bishop BTW, unlike Bayside, Medjugorje, Garabandal, Van Nuys, Cucamonga and La Habra.  Now maybe THOSE would aim to "make people believe" something, but like I said, they haven't been approved, so they don't make anyone believe anything, either.

Nobody is "made" to believe something by any apparition.




Well, your blogspot might be fun for members who are fluent in Français, but it's of no use to me.

Translation, please.  And don't say "Google."  I've already explained that to you.


.