Author Topic: What the anti-Resistance is made of (Read 9261 times)

Matthew · « **on:** March 09, 2014, 12:18:56 AM »

An anecdote taken from a Fr. Hewko sermon, which took place at a chapel close to my home:

Fr. Zendejas was giving a sermon during which he asked the parishioners to pray for Bishop Williamson also, as he was one of the four bishops consecrated by Archbishop Lefebvre. He needs our prayers too.

Mass ended.

Only minutes after Mass is over, Father gets a call from US District Headquarters! The priest on the other end was furious that he would "bring up Bishop Williamson in a sermon", etc.

So we have 2 ridiculous things to point out:

1. A parishioner thought it was worth tattling about and whipped out his cell phone during Mass
2. Someone at District HQ agreed, and went ahead and got angry about it and dealt with it (rather than ignoring it, as they should have)!

Reason #32110 why I support the Resistance: I could never be on the same side as these people. I would never be able to justify them, much less see myself as one of them.

Matthew · « **Reply #1 on:** March 09, 2014, 12:21:10 AM »

As the Resistance Fathers have frequently pointed out -- this is war. These men won't back down one inch, and they are always pressing their advantage.

They see us as the enemy, because we oppose their questionable statements, goals and doctrine.

P.S. Fr. Rostand is currently visiting my local SSPX priory. He will be in Houston, TX tomorrow.

holysoulsacademy · « **Reply #2 on:** March 09, 2014, 12:55:37 AM »

+AMDG+
First Sunday in Lent 2014
Feast Of Saint Frances of Rome

Thumbs Up Matthew.

:applause:

They have just behaved absolutely wicked!
My friend, the elderly lady who is a Third Order, sent to study Sacrosanctum Concilium by Fr. Purdy, has now officially refused to discuss any of these matters with me anymore.
And has even gone so far as to discontinue associating with me.
All out of fear of being found out to be associated with anyone supporting the Resistance.

:scared2: :scared2: :scared2:

She has also been given the impression that she could not and should not discuss or inquire about these matters at their SSPX chapel, under pain of being kicked out of the chapel.

BTW I was studying SC and trying to make notes for her, and she now refuses to read anything that has to do with the "ignorant" priests (Fr. Purdy's words) of the Resistance.

If anyone is interested, Paragraph 22 on SC is very insightful.
This paragraph is possibly one of the biggest reasons why they are lauding this evil, evil, evil Vat2 doc.
This place the Bishop in a very favorable and powerful position.

Frances · « **Reply #3 on:** March 09, 2014, 07:21:20 AM »

:dancing-banana:
An elderly woman is threatened by her superior for asking questions about religion? She is now afraid to go to Mass or to open her mouth? Is this not the errors of Russia, (communism!) now come into the SSPX, just as Our Lady of Fatima warned?
A priest is rebuked by his Superior for requesting prayers for another priest? Are we not commanded to pray for our "enemies," as this is what Bp. W. has now become to authorities of the sspx? One of the sheep tattles on his priest? Again, the use of fear by an authority to control those below. Communism!
"Everything you think, say, and do, can and will be used against you...in the Church?"
Is this the charge Our Lord gave to St. Peter when He said, "Feed my lambs?"
For how long will the priests and faithful be willing to hear Mass in an atmosphere of paranoia?

These are the identifying marks of a cult, not those of the One, Holy, Catholic, Apostolic Church founded by Our Lord Jesus Christ!

Elizabeth · « **Reply #4 on:** March 09, 2014, 12:02:52 PM »

Quote from: Matthew

1. A parishioner thought it was worth tattling about and whipped out his cell phone during Mass

This type of behavior is so galling, so horrifying.
IMO the next step is sneaking electronics into the Confessional.
Re-inforced by whomever reacted in the parishoner's favor.

Elizabeth · « **Reply #5 on:** March 09, 2014, 12:07:20 PM »

Quote from: holysoulsacademy

+AMDG+
First Sunday in Lent 2014
Feast Of Saint Frances of Rome

Thumbs Up Matthew.

:applause:

They have just behaved absolutely wicked!
My friend, the elderly lady who is a Third Order, sent to study Sacrosanctum Concilium by Fr. Purdy, has now officially refused to discuss any of these matters with me anymore.
And has even gone so far as to discontinue associating with me.
All out of fear of being found out to be associated with anyone supporting the Resistance.

:scared2: :scared2: :scared2:

She has also been given the impression that she could not and should not discuss or inquire about these matters at their SSPX chapel, under pain of being kicked out of the chapel.

BTW I was studying SC and trying to make notes for her, and she now refuses to read anything that has to do with the "ignorant" priests (Fr. Purdy's words) of the Resistance.

If anyone is interested, Paragraph 22 on SC is very insightful.
This paragraph is possibly one of the biggest reasons why they are lauding this evil, evil, evil Vat2 doc.
This place the Bishop in a very favorable and powerful position.

Was this the same priest who used to be stationed in Chicago about 8 years ago?

LKCTexas · « **Reply #6 on:** March 09, 2014, 01:39:24 PM »

TRADCATs, are we not playing into the enemies hands when we pay inordinate attention to the obvious infiltration of SSPX by the enemies of the Church? We all morn to see what others either don't see or do not want to see, likely for much of the reasons already expressed in this discussion (sentimentality). However, I pray that we march on with Our Lady under the banner of Christ the King for which I know Archbishop Lefebvre would ask of us - keep the Faith of all times, penance-fasting-prayer, help in charity, prepare to suffer even greater possibly even to martyrdom.

True RESISTANCE is continuing in Tradition and RESIST TO THE FACE the heretical errors of the Novus Disordered Church and the ʝʊdɛօ-Masonry revolution from Hell. Stop and think why Our Lord is allowing this to happen - Duhh, our sins maybe? Are not True Trads to continue the path set forth by Archbishop Lefebvre regardless the direction Bishop Fellay and followers have decided to take?

What is happening to the Church is as prophesied by Our Lady of Quito, La Salette, Fatima. Is not Our Lord allowing us to be reduced so that the glory of Our Lady's triumph and the Church will be all Her and not even attributed to the fidelity of any Catholic order such as SSPX?

A sign that what is happening to SSPX is Masonic is the shadow of the same recipe the Masons used leading up to the Vatican II revolt as revealed by the Alta Vendita, quote, "It is to the youth we must go, it is that which we must seduce; it is that which we must bring under the banner of the secret societies.” Just as the late 19th and 20th century clergy were duped by the poison of freemasonic principles so has SSPX, with the intent not to destroy the structure but to empty it of its Divine content - behold neo-SSPX with the teeth of chickens.

We certainly want to continue to pray, Oh and yes, for Bishop Fellay as well, that many of the faithful and priests of SSPX wake up to return on course of the founder of SSPX, namely, THE CROSS. Strongly recommend reading Friends of the Cross by St. Louis De Montfort again.

OUR MANDATE [Declaration of November 21, 1974]
We hold firmly with all our heart and with all our mind to Catholic Rome, Guardian of the Catholic Faith and of the traditions necessary to the maintenance of this faith, to the eternal Rome, mistress of wisdom and truth.

We refuse on the other hand, and have always refused, to follow the Rome of Neo-Modernist and Neo-Protestant tendencies, which became clearly manifest during the Second Vatican Council, and after the Council, in all the reforms which issued from it.

No authority, not even the highest in the hierarchy, can compel us to abandon or to diminish our Catholic Faith, so clearly expressed and professed by the Church's Magisterium for nineteen centuries.

That is why we hold firmly to everything that has been consistently taught and practiced by the Church (and codified in books published before the Modernist influence of the Council) concerning faith, morals, divine worship, catechetics, priestly formation, and the institution of the Church, until such time as the true light of tradition dissipates the gloom which obscures the sky of the eternal Rome.

VIVAT CHRISTUS REX,
Patrick Coon
Georgetown, Texas

John Grace · « **Reply #7 on:** March 09, 2014, 01:56:35 PM »

Stand up to those thugs.Fr Morgan strong armed an elderly woman in Dublin. The cheek of her to ask Bishop Fellay a question. There is a very unhealthy and nefarious atmosphere among those, who remain with the neo SSPX.

John Grace · « **Reply #8 on:** March 09, 2014, 02:01:14 PM »

Quote

Reason #32110 why I support the Resistance: I could never be on the same side as these people. I would never be able to justify them, much less see myself as one of them.

A reason I didn't go to Knock shrine with Fr Paul Morgan. Many pro-resistance did. Several priests within his district have preached against the resistance. Some who promote The Recusant have been threatened with being denied the sacraments.

All happening under his watch. He is meant to be one of the better priests. Already 'good' priests are sliding.

John Grace · « **Reply #9 on:** March 09, 2014, 02:15:54 PM »

Quote from: Matthew

As the Resistance Fathers have frequently pointed out -- this is war. These men won't back down one inch, and they are always pressing their advantage.

They see us as the enemy, because we oppose their questionable statements, goals and doctrine.

P.S. Fr. Rostand is currently visiting my local SSPX priory. He will be in Houston, TX tomorrow.

They are certainly threatened. They have been exposed.

John Grace · « **Reply #10 on:** March 09, 2014, 02:25:53 PM »

Quote from: Frances

:dancing-banana:
An elderly woman is threatened by her superior for asking questions about religion? She is now afraid to go to Mass or to open her mouth? Is this not the errors of Russia, (communism!) now come into the SSPX, just as Our Lady of Fatima warned?
A priest is rebuked by his Superior for requesting prayers for another priest? Are we not commanded to pray for our "enemies," as this is what Bp. W. has now become to authorities of the sspx? One of the sheep tattles on his priest? Again, the use of fear by an authority to control those below. Communism!
"Everything you think, say, and do, can and will be used against you...in the Church?"
Is this the charge Our Lord gave to St. Peter when He said, "Feed my lambs?"
For how long will the priests and faithful be willing to hear Mass in an atmosphere of paranoia?

These are the identifying marks of a cult, not those of the One, Holy, Catholic, Apostolic Church founded by Our Lord Jesus Christ!

All part of the mindset among the SSPX. Their mantra has been 'pray,pay,obey'.

As much as many of use admire Bishop Williamson, he had to go. It had to be done. All part of the new direction.

Whilst I don't dispute a few SSPX priests and laity are solid on the Yids, the neo SSPX is Zionist.

John Grace · « **Reply #11 on:** March 09, 2014, 02:35:00 PM »

Quote from: LKCTexas

TRADCATs, are we not playing into the enemies hands when we pay inordinate attention to the obvious infiltration of SSPX by the enemies of the Church? We all morn to see what others either don't see or do not want to see, likely for much of the reasons already expressed in this discussion (sentimentality). However, I pray that we march on with Our Lady under the banner of Christ the King for which I know Archbishop Lefebvre would ask of us - keep the Faith of all times, penance-fasting-prayer, help in charity, prepare to suffer even greater possibly even to martyrdom.

True RESISTANCE is continuing in Tradition and RESIST TO THE FACE the heretical errors of the Novus Disordered Church and the ʝʊdɛօ-Masonry revolution from Hell. Stop and think why Our Lord is allowing this to happen - Duhh, our sins maybe? Are not True Trads to continue the path set forth by Archbishop Lefebvre regardless the direction Bishop Fellay and followers have decided to take?

What is happening to the Church is as prophesied by Our Lady of Quito, La Salette, Fatima. Is not Our Lord allowing us to be reduced so that the glory of Our Lady's triumph and the Church will be all Her and not even attributed to the fidelity of any Catholic order such as SSPX?

A sign that what is happening to SSPX is Masonic is the shadow of the same recipe the Masons used leading up to the Vatican II revolt as revealed by the Alta Vendita, quote, "It is to the youth we must go, it is that which we must seduce; it is that which we must bring under the banner of the secret societies.” Just as the late 19th and 20th century clergy were duped by the poison of freemasonic principles so has SSPX, with the intent not to destroy the structure but to empty it of its Divine content - behold neo-SSPX with the teeth of chickens.

We certainly want to continue to pray, Oh and yes, for Bishop Fellay as well, that many of the faithful and priests of SSPX wake up to return on course of the founder of SSPX, namely, THE CROSS. Strongly recommend reading Friends of the Cross by St. Louis De Montfort again.

OUR MANDATE [Declaration of November 21, 1974]
We hold firmly with all our heart and with all our mind to Catholic Rome, Guardian of the Catholic Faith and of the traditions necessary to the maintenance of this faith, to the eternal Rome, mistress of wisdom and truth.

We refuse on the other hand, and have always refused, to follow the Rome of Neo-Modernist and Neo-Protestant tendencies, which became clearly manifest during the Second Vatican Council, and after the Council, in all the reforms which issued from it.

No authority, not even the highest in the hierarchy, can compel us to abandon or to diminish our Catholic Faith, so clearly expressed and professed by the Church's Magisterium for nineteen centuries.

That is why we hold firmly to everything that has been consistently taught and practiced by the Church (and codified in books published before the Modernist influence of the Council) concerning faith, morals, divine worship, catechetics, priestly formation, and the institution of the Church, until such time as the true light of tradition dissipates the gloom which obscures the sky of the eternal Rome.

VIVAT CHRISTUS REX,
Patrick Coon
Georgetown, Texas

Many thanks for this. There is few who would disagree.

Matto · « **Reply #12 on:** March 09, 2014, 02:47:20 PM »

I love Father Zendejas though I don't know him well. He used to be the priest at my chapel before I started attending Mass there regularly. All of the people who have been going to the chapel for a while think he was the best priest we have had here.

Frances · « **Reply #13 on:** March 09, 2014, 02:53:15 PM »

:dancing-banana:

Quote from: Matto

I love Father Zendejas though I don't know him well. He used to be the priest at my chapel before I started attending Mass there regularly. All of the people who have been going to the chapel for a while think he was the best priest we have had here.

Unless he has been thoroughly brainwashed, Fr. Zendejas is a very holy priest.

John Grace · « **Reply #14 on:** March 09, 2014, 04:08:35 PM »

Fr Fuchs addressed the point about priests not speaking out. This is available via The Recusant website. It's not good enough to be pro-resistance in private.