BYNYC:  In the hopes that you see this, I did see your siggie.  I am sorry that you have decided to move on.  Just so you know that was not my intention.  I do hope you re-consider.  We all have our moments and I think we can all understand given the current crisis has gotten all of us emotionally charged.  Sometimes I think we take our anger out on each other even when down deep inside we don't mean to.  We're mad at those who got us into this mess.  But we can't do anything about it.

Quote from: 2Vermont

Quote from: BTNYC

Quote from: 2Vermont

Quote from: BTNYC

Quote from: 2Vermont

As a sede, I guess I don't see the canonizations as the "line in the sand", but I have noticed that you love to generalize SV's.

Now that's a bit of a generalization, isn't it?

Thank you for clarifying that you don't see the canonizations as a "line in the sand."

No, I've read a number of your most recent posts and they are all anti-SV and love to lump us all into what you consider to be what we think/believe.

So far you've had some of the most SV active posters respond to you and none of them believe this so-called line in the sand.

Maybe it's time for you to reconsider how you view us.

How do you know what I "love" to do? Do you read hearts?

Perhaps you should read a certain thread called "The Line in the Sand." This was not my phrase of choice. Obviously some sedevacantists believe this to be a line in the sand. If you don't, then my arguments don't apply to you.

You're backpedalling.  Your OP was dripping with indignation for sedevacantists and you posted it to sedevacantists as a whole, not just "some".

 

Knock it off with the subjective emotional talk of "indignation" and what I "love" to do.

I addressed my post to sedevacantists and asked about the implications of the "line in the sand" talk that has been going on around here. Simple deductive reasoning indicates that I am therefore addressing:

1. Sedevacantists

2. Who believe April 27 is a "Line in the Sand."

I didn't just pull this out of thin air. There is a whole thread called "The Line in the Sand" devoted to treating April 27 as an ultimatum for R&R-ers for crying out loud. This thread is an obvious response to that one.

You don't believe it is a line in the sand. Good for you. Thank you for clarifying. Now take your emotionalism and judgments about my motivations and interior disposition and move along.

I don't know if I qualify as a "sede" under whosever criteria of what that is. Of everything that has been said the reference to April 27th is lacking. The canonizations will not be the deciding factor of anything. Being more realistic, the synod of 2015 if the conciliar schismatic entity that is the new church transforms even more, as can only logically be expected, and allows divorced, remarried couples to receive Communion this will at least be the start to the seperation and identification as non-Catholics to all who allow and participate in such a sacraledge.