Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Eleison Comments - Why Tradition? (no. 527)  (Read 2956 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Meg

Re: Eleison Comments - Why Tradition? (no. 527)
« Reply #5 on: August 19, 2017, 12:59:42 PM »

Number DXXVII (527)
August 19, 2017
So let us look at a modernist encyclopedia’s useful ten-point summary of the new teaching of Vatican II, together with the briefest of pointers to the error in each point. The ten points are in italics, their skeletal refutation follows immediately each point:—

Bishop Williamson is listing ten points of the modernist encyclopedia (in italics), with a refutation that follows, but apparently, there isn't a refutation for some of the points, or the refutations were also mistakenly put in italics, therefore making it difficult to know which are the modernist points, and what is +W's refutation.

Re: Eleison Comments - Why Tradition? (no. 527)
« Reply #6 on: August 19, 2017, 10:24:06 PM »
I noticed  this too:
Bishop Williamson is listing ten points of the modernist encyclopedia (in italics), with a refutation that follows, but apparently, there isn't a refutation for some of the points, or the refutations were also mistakenly put in italics, therefore making it difficult to know which are the modernist points, and what is +W's refutation.

.
There is a glitch in the last part of the OP.
.


Re: Eleison Comments - Why Tradition? (no. 527)
« Reply #7 on: August 20, 2017, 12:27:49 PM »
This is just more white noise to keep the masses occupied.
We have here the admission that this so called council teaches error harmful to the Faith.  What concrete conclusion does he draw from this?
Come to Broadstairs and listen to a literary lecture.

Re: Eleison Comments - Why Tradition? (no. 527)
« Reply #8 on: August 20, 2017, 12:49:43 PM »
This is just more white noise to keep the masses occupied.
We have here the admission that this so called council teaches error harmful to the Faith.  What concrete conclusion does he draw from this?
Come to Broadstairs and listen to a literary lecture.
Yep. This. Never mind the hide in plain site question (posed by WHO and, ALLEGEDLY, what?) which equates to "Why Catholicism?"

Re: Eleison Comments - Why Tradition? (no. 527)
« Reply #9 on: August 20, 2017, 02:55:45 PM »
This is just more white noise to keep the masses occupied.
We have here the admission that this so called council teaches error harmful to the Faith.  What concrete conclusion does he draw from this?
Come to Broadstairs and listen to a literary lecture.
Better than stuff"n one's face with coffee and donuts...

I'd be there in a heartbeat if it weren't for a ocean between me and it...  :P

Have you ever even attended a conference by Dr White?