2Vermont articulately described the pattern and Mens Infirmus's was indeed the capper. The troll made early mention of Palma da Troya. Does that sound like someone lacking in details about Abp. Thuc?

Gullibility is not "charity."

It is overdue for practicing Catholics to remember the Crusaders and quit acting like Novus Ordo fαɢɢօts and cat lady Karens.

I know people who have asked similar questions as Infirmus and who then looked into the information they were given and became very solid and devout traditional Catholics...

I live amidst a sea of novus ordo people and I am the only traditional Catholic in my family.  I know what it means to have to fight for the Faith.  You could ask our mutual friends the Sharpes to verify this and I am sure that they could tell you many stories backing up what I am saying...

So, call me gullible if you wish...

I leave all in God's Hands.

Fine ask the ones you love.

I don't understand, why you think this platform gives you the right to not be a gentleman.

Just a guess, but maybe the women you love in real life are too scared of you to tell you the truth.

Sorry Mark, the last line was a bit much.  I shouldn't have said it.

Archbishop Thuc gave his talk at the SSPX seminary in 1974 but...then Paul VI died and once JPII was elected in 1978 Archbishop Lefevbre became focused on rejoining Rome.

 Lefevbre likely needed to distance himself from Archbishop Thuc if he was going to make smooth negotiations with the vatican.

I remember hearing once (but I can't remember the source) that Lefevbre had too much to risk visiting Palmar or consecrating bishops but Archbishop Thuc already had nothing to lose as he had already lost everything except his Faith.

It's good to see a bit of background to the situation. Though in 1978, +ABL was technically still with Rome, since he wasn't excommunicated until 1988. He was suspended in 1976. But of course he continued to ordain priests after the suspension. He didn't want to sever ties with Rome, but that changed after 1988. His situation was quite a bit different than +Thuc, in that +ABL had a seminary and seminarians to consider. And what to do with those seminarians after they were ordained? No diocese wanted them, so he had to have his own chapels. Both men had a strong Traditional Faith, though the paths they took were very different. 

"It was at the height of the crisis in 1974 that Archbishop Thuc became associated with the SSPX, when he visited Econe to give a talk." (The Life and Legacy of Archbishop Lefevbre Pg. 74)

Thanks AMDGJMJ
who is the author of that book?

I thought I'd post this thread in The Library for those sincerely interested:

Autobiography of Archbishop Thuc - page 1 - The Library - Catholic Info (cathinfo.com)

I ask you, "What has Meg's anti-sede obsession earned?" "What has Meg's dogmatism earned?" "What has Meg's interior reading and remote viewing earned?"

There's nothing remote about your emotional and bullying behavior here. It's all here for everyone to see. Some here are fine with it, and some aren't. 

Really? You claim here that you know I do nothing Crusader-like. How could you know that without "remote viewing"?

You are the one who first brought up the Crusaders, and you said that traditional Catholics should behave more like Crusaders. Didn't you mean that Traditional Catholic have to behave more like Crusaders on this forum? Or did you mean something else? I'm not interested in your behavior outside of this forum. And, emotional bullying by you isn't the same thing as being a Crusader. Why would you think that it is? 

Perhaps you should read the precise wording before you project your emotionalism and read my interior forum.

What is your anti-sede obsession, but emotional and bullying?

What is your anti-sede obsession, but fighting traditional Catholics?

Readers see that you project your own psychological problems on others.

Your emotional bullying is exterior.