You are correct. All I know of you is from Cathinfo. And that's more than enough to see that you are hyper-emotional. I am only commenting about what you post here. Why would I be interested in anything else?

Did you happen to notice that the recent post by AMDGJMJ got 6 upvotes? You can deny what I say, as usual, but can you deny that 6 other forum members agreed with AMDGJMJ?

Keep channeling your inner demons who "help" you read  the interior forum of others and observe them with your "remote viewing."

As if you are not "hyper-emotional" about sharing your anti-sede mania with Infirmus in a folie à deux???

If/when I need advice from a woman, I will ask the ones I love.

Apparently the troll has succeeded in sowing the discord he wanted.  I suggest that the Karens feed their cats instead of feeding the troll.

Fine ask the ones you love.

I don't understand, why you think this platform gives you the right to not be a gentleman.

Just a guess, but maybe the women you love in real life are too scared of you to tell you the truth.

How do you define obscene speech?

Why do you think Infirmus is still here?

Mark used none of the above. Grow up.

My post was as much for Infirmus as it was for Mark.

The point is that you should treat everyone as if you were speaking to Christ directly.  I don't know why this is such a hard concept to grasp.

It is very clear what God expected from his words at the last supper.

John 13: 34-35
" 34 A new commandment I give unto you: That you love one another, as I have loved you, that you also love one another.  35 By this shall all men know that you are my disciples, if you have love one for another."

Well, +Thuc did make mistakes, mainly in consecrating so many men. Do we just forget about that? Before this forum became sedevacantist, it wasn't a scandal to mention issues with +Thuc. But now it is of course.

Though I do admire +Thuc also. He meant well, and he was very devout. And he suffered very much in his last days.

As if you are in any position to judge anyone, especially one of Abp. Thuc's stature???

As if the cat lady Karens have bumped Christ from His Judgement Seat?

CatLadyKarens.com

Time will certainly prove things out, but did you miss the popcorn icon with this last inquiry?:
"What did he do? ").

What did that mean to you? To me, that was a clear indication of someone who wasn't really looking for an answer (especially given his posting history up to this point).  To me, it was indicative of a person who was insinuating that Archbishop Thuc did nothing (or at least nothing worthwhile in his view) for all of those years. 

Maybe he'll surprise the rest of us and actually write some positive posts about the good Archbishop (and perhaps at least some productive ones about sedevacantism) now that he's learned a bit more about him and what he did during those years. But, again, even if he were to do that, time will tell what his real purpose is for being here. 

So far, he's been nothing but inflammatory.  At the very least, as a new poster, his behavior has been quite....brazen.  New posters typically take time to jump in, get a reading on the forum, get to know the posters, etc. 

Yes, others have been judged falsely in the past, but I would bet quite a lot that we're not wrong about this one.  I think Mark hit the nail on the head right from the very start.

I took the popcorn emjoi from Infirmus as him saying that he was still waiting for a good answer rather than people making comments about anything except what he asked.  Hence the reason I answered his questions.