May he rest in peace.  

Thank you.

If anyone shits in our living room once, my "charity" is immediately exhausted. When they do it repeatedly, expect action. "Class" is not my concern. The invasion is my concern.

It's overdue for practicing Catholic men to stop acting like a bunch of Milquetoast fαɢɢօts.

It's quite clear to me that Mens Infirmus is not looking for answers. Read his posts. He is a dubiously male version of the anti-sede obsessive Meg.

Who imagines that any "answer" will satisfy that obsessive troll?

Reacting an emotional manner, as you often do, isn't "manly," It's feminine. You are the most emotional guy here. 

Why assume the worst of someone whom you do not know?

Why assume that he is a troll?

And why all the foul language on a public forum where ladies are present?

I am ashamed to see the posts which some people have posted in response to his few posts.

I gather from reading his posts that he has had some bad experiences with totalist sedevacantists.  Why add upon the fire and give him more reason to be upset?

Why not instead assume that he has been hurt and may need some understanding and charity?

He obviously went and read the other post I shared from the CMRI (since he quoted it in this thread) and then had questions about it.  Granted, he may be a bit prejudiced against Thuc and the sedes.  But why make things worse by calling him names? 

***

If he is a troll, simple truthful answers will be enough to make him bored.  But name calling and reacting in a bad way only encourages bad reactions on both sides.

I have known MANY people to be quickly judged falsely when joining this forum.  It is quite pitiful.

Omnia ad majored Dei Gloriam! 

Time will certainly prove things out, but did you miss the popcorn icon with this last inquiry?:
"What did he do? ").

What did that mean to you? To me, that was a clear indication of someone who wasn't really looking for an answer (especially given his posting history up to this point).  To me, it was indicative of a person who was insinuating that Archbishop Thuc did nothing (or at least nothing worthwhile in his view) for all of those years. 

Maybe he'll surprise the rest of us and actually write some positive posts about the good Archbishop (and perhaps at least some productive ones about sedevacantism) now that he's learned a bit more about him and what he did during those years. But, again, even if he were to do that, time will tell what his real purpose is for being here. 

So far, he's been nothing but inflammatory.  At the very least, as a new poster, his behavior has been quite....brazen.  New posters typically take time to jump in, get a reading on the forum, get to know the posters, etc. 

Yes, others have been judged falsely in the past, but I would bet quite a lot that we're not wrong about this one.   I think Mark hit the nail on the head right from the very start.

Why assume the worst of someone whom you do not know?

Why assume that he is a troll?

And why all the foul language on a public forum where ladies are present?

I am ashamed to see the posts which some people have posted in response to his few posts.

I gather from reading his posts that he has had some bad experiences with totalist sedevacantists.  Why add upon the fire and give him more reason to be upset?

Why not instead assume that he has been hurt and may need some understanding and charity?

He obviously went and read the other post I shared from the CMRI (since he quoted it in this thread) and then had questions about it.  Granted, he may be a bit prejudiced against Thuc and the sedes.  But why make things worse by calling him names? 

***

If he is a troll, simple truthful answers will be enough to make him bored.  But name calling and reacting in a bad way only encourages bad reactions on both sides.

I have known MANY people to be quickly judged falsely when joining this forum.  It is quite pitiful.

Omnia ad majored Dei Gloriam! 

2Vermont articulately described the pattern and Mens Infirmus's was indeed the capper. The troll made early mention of Palma da Troya. Does that sound like someone lacking in details about Abp. Thuc?

Gullibility is not "charity."

It is overdue for practicing Catholics to remember the Crusaders and quit acting like Novus Ordo fαɢɢօts and cat lady Karens.

2Vermont articulately described the pattern and Mens Infirmus's was indeed the capper. The troll made early mention of Palma da Troya. Does that sound like someone lacking in details about Abp. Thuc?

Gullibility is not "charity."

It is overdue for practicing Catholics to remember the Crusaders and quit acting like Novus Ordo fαɢɢօts and cat lady Karens.

Men can be strong without the repulsive language.  The pledge below from the Holy Name Society, might be helpful.
Here is a little history https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Society_of_the_Holy_Name. 

Just felt like sharing.  Do with it what you wish.

  Holy Name Pledge

Blessed be God, the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost!

I profess publicly my belief that Our Lord Jesus Christ
is the son of God,
made man for the salvation of mankind.

I recognize His divine authority,
and believe that all power on earth,
civil and religious,
comes from Him.

All lawfully constituted authority
I respect and promise to obey.

May the God of Justice
quide the minds and uphold the hands
of those vested with its power.

May the God of Might break asunder
the bonds of those met together
against the Lord
and against His Christ.

In honor of His divine Name,
I pledge myself
against perjury, blasphemy,
profanity and obscene speech,

Praised be the Name of God,
and blessed be the name of His divine Son,
now and forever.

Men can be strong without the repulsive language.  The pledge below from the Holy Name Society, might be helpful.…

If/when I need advice from a woman, I will ask the ones I love.

Apparently the troll has succeeded in sowing the discord he wanted.  I suggest that the Karens feed their cats instead of feeding the troll.

You are correct. All I know of you is from Cathinfo. And that's more than enough to see that you are hyper-emotional. I am only commenting about what you post here. Why would I be interested in anything else?

Did you happen to notice that the recent post by AMDGJMJ got 6 upvotes? You can deny what I say, as usual, but can you deny that 6 other forum members agreed with AMDGJMJ?

The sentiments expressed by AMDG are good, but Are they really relevant in the situation?Infirmus did not bother to respond to her first post here. He has however managed to put the cat among the pigeons.

Check out Infirmus’ rating. The general consensus shows him to be here not to learn but to cause conflict. That’s my reading anyway.