Author Topic: What cane be done to get rid of Bishop Fellay as Superior? (Read 12227 times)

Domitilla · « **Reply #90 on:** July 18, 2012, 06:06:30 PM »

I thought your comment was quite humorous, Ferdinand. Too many Trads take themselves a bit too seriously ...

Incredulous · « **Reply #91 on:** July 18, 2012, 07:06:25 PM »

Quote from: Clelia

Quote from: Incredulous
Quote from: John Grace
Quote
all the SSPX priests are very traditional and solid priests

Are the 29 who voted to exclude Bishop Williamson "very traditional and solid priests"? I realise Bishop Fellay has surrounded himself with those who share his view but to be fair to them they haven't celebrated the New Mass yet?

These that claim Bishop Williamson has been disobedient have still not pointed out where he is against the doctrine and church teachings? It is generally it is his right and duty as a Bishop to continue his weekly comments. He has a right and duty to preach and teach. He is a validly consecrated Bishop.

Were the SSPX names of the 29:9 vote given out ?

Aren't you too young to smoke? :judge:

Yeah, I took up smoking in 2010, when I read the story "Maximilian Krah and Menzingen, a cause for concern?"

The implications of Bp. Fellay's scandal made me a nervous wreck.

After the SSPX Chapter meeting... I've been thinking about switching to cigars.

magdalena · « **Reply #92 on:** July 18, 2012, 09:32:21 PM »

Possibly worst of all, +Fellay has effectively stolen the Episcopates of +Tissier, +Galarreta and +Williamson. For if they follow him to neo-modernist Rome, they will no longer be that which they were consecrated to be: spiritual sons of +ABL. And if they refuse, they will be bishops without priests to ordain, because all the seminaries will have been handed over to neo-Rome. Such cunning as this can only have come from one source.

Columba · « **Reply #93 on:** July 18, 2012, 10:34:59 PM »

Quote from: magdalena

Possibly worst of all, +Fellay has effectively stolen the Episcopates of +Tissier, +Galarreta and +Williamson. For if they follow him to neo-modernist Rome, they will no longer be that which they were consecrated to be: spiritual sons of +ABL. And if they refuse, they will be bishops without priests to ordain, because all the seminaries will have been handed over to neo-Rome. Such cunning as this can only have come from one source.

If the hijack of the SSPX shell is consummated, new seminaries could be started. The traditionalist Benedictines, Dominicans, and Franciscans have seminarians who will require bishops for ordinations. The remnant SSPX groups will need bishops for confirmations.

Thursday · « **Reply #94 on:** July 19, 2012, 02:36:51 AM »

Surely it would be easier for the SSPX hardliners to unite with the CMRI than with Rome. It seems the CMRI are mostly sedevacantist, not sure if that is a requirement or not.

Ferdinand · « **Reply #95 on:** July 20, 2012, 10:57:01 PM »

Continue to shout from the hilltops...

+Fellay and his ilk must be go!!! Let them take the buildings, they can't take the Faith (unless you let him).

Quote

"They can occupy our churches, but they are outside the true Faith. You remain outside the places of worship, but the Faith dwells within you. Let us consider: what is more important, the place or the Faith? The true Faith, obviously. Who has lost and who has won in the struggle – the one who keeps the premises or the one who keeps the Faith?"

~St. Athanasius

This was of course the sentiment of ABL.