CathInfo.com

I'd just like to say that I really appreciate everyone's comments here, because
you collectively are to me as a voice of sanity in a crazy world. So my
hat's off to you!


Please allow me to add a shimmer of context to this. I spoke to a friend yesterday
after Mass, and mentioned to him how the SSPX seems to be on the verge of
a major division, with priests who defend Tradition being perhaps separated
from the Society, along with their faithful who will not abandon them in this time
of trial. But the real estate, and the hand-picked District Superiors are in the
hip pocket of +Fellay, who is gung-ho on making a "deal" with Rome. His response
was categorical: all the SSPX priests are very traditional and solid priests, and
there is no danger of any split happening, and everything is fine. Period.

I mention this example because I think his attitude is not uncommon.

I asked him, "What about the revision of the 1962 missal that's coming out in
December, which the Society is going to be ordered to use by +Fellay and his
hip-pocket lackeys?" He didn't know anything about any revision of the missal,
nor was he interested to find out from me. He is the expert, you see, and I am
not the one to inform HIM. Wrong way street.

Then I told him that there is a sub-contractor, hired by the Vatican, to print the
new edition of the missal, which will have many changed prayers in it, and
that Angelus Press is not printing any of these. He said he didn't think there
is any such printing going on, and that even if there was, it wouldn't be a
problem for the SSPX, because they won't be changing anything, so there!

I think it's worthwhile to go around and ask your friends a few questions, to get
their responses right now, when they're so confident to dish them out, so that
after a few months, you can have the option of pulling those out and tell them,
"Well, in July of this year, when I asked you A, B and C, you told me D, E and
F, but now we see that's not happening at all, and that A, B and C have quite
different answers, do they not? Perhaps in this way, your friends can learn
from their mistakes, before it's too late.

And then again, maybe not.

Quote

all the SSPX priests are very traditional and solid priests

Are the 29 who voted to exclude Bishop Williamson "very traditional and solid priests"? I realise Bishop Fellay has surrounded himself with those who share his view but to be fair to them they haven't celebrated the New Mass yet?

These that claim Bishop Williamson has been disobedient have still not pointed out where he is against the doctrine and church teachings? It is generally it is his right and duty as a Bishop to continue his weekly comments. He has a right and duty to preach and teach. He is a validly consecrated Bishop.

Hi Mar,
Here is the link


http://www.cathinfo.com/catholic.php/Fr-Jos-Pfeiffer-SSPX-Sermon-Feast-of-the-Most-Precious-Blood