Author Topic: What are the chances of Williamson reuniting with SSPX? (Read 10799 times)

hollingsworth · « **Reply #25 on:** September 18, 2015, 12:53:12 PM »

Neil O:

Quote

Bishop Williamson did not advise a woman to attend the N.O., but only explained to everyone publicly that he did not advise AGAINST her doing so, for personal reasons applicable only to her case and to others like her.

I agree entirely. J Paul would argue against that position, but, I believe, he does so in good faith. 2Vermont, on the other hand, is against the bishop across the board. She, along with several others, attacks the bishop maliciously, and always with the intention of bringing him down IMO. 2Vermont identifies very comfortably with the creepy-crawlies " over on ABL2. I was kicked off ABL2 yesterday. I wear that expulsion as a badge of honor, (although my lack of charity at times was not commendable. So I am not totally innocent myself.) Having admitted that, however, I believe that numbers of so-called "traditional Catholics" are, in fact, fifth columnist who are under a great deal of Tribal influence, as is the SSPX today, IMO.

2Vermont · « **Reply #26 on:** September 18, 2015, 03:44:48 PM »

Quote from: hollingsworth

Neil O:
Quote
Bishop Williamson did not advise a woman to attend the N.O., but only explained to everyone publicly that he did not advise AGAINST her doing so, for personal reasons applicable only to her case and to others like her.

I agree entirely. J Paul would argue against that position, but, I believe, he does so in good faith. 2Vermont, on the other hand, is against the bishop across the board. She, along with several others, attacks the bishop maliciously, and always with the intention of bringing him down IMO. 2Vermont identifies very comfortably with the creepy-crawlies " over on ABL2. I was kicked off ABL2 yesterday. I wear that expulsion as a badge of honor, (although my lack of charity at times was not commendable. So I am not totally innocent myself.) Having admitted that, however, I believe that numbers of so-called "traditional Catholics" are, in fact, fifth columnist who are under a great deal of Tribal influence, as is the SSPX today, IMO.

Creepy crawlies...lol. Your name calling is so childish.

JPaul · « **Reply #27 on:** September 18, 2015, 09:38:14 PM »

Quote from: hollingsworth

Neil O:
Quote
Bishop Williamson did not advise a woman to attend the N.O., but only explained to everyone publicly that he did not advise AGAINST her doing so, for personal reasons applicable only to her case and to others like her.

I agree entirely. J Paul would argue against that position, but, I believe, he does so in good faith. 2Vermont, on the other hand, is against the bishop across the board. She, along with several others, attacks the bishop maliciously, and always with the intention of bringing him down IMO. 2Vermont identifies very comfortably with the creepy-crawlies " over on ABL2. I was kicked off ABL2 yesterday. I wear that expulsion as a badge of honor, (although my lack of charity at times was not commendable. So I am not totally innocent myself.) Having admitted that, however, I believe that numbers of so-called "traditional Catholics" are, in fact, fifth columnist who are under a great deal of Tribal influence, as is the SSPX today, IMO.

Yes, that kicking off business was unnecessary. Others are tolerated who are much less charitable than you.
Neo-Tradition is indeed rife with sectarianism, cultishness, and my guy is better than your guyism.
A lot of tearing down and little building up. Much military talk and titles with no plans how to win the battle, little conceptualizing of strategy but grand presumptions of victories.

Your mention of the fifth column strategy is timely. It has been used successfully for millennia and is still here today...........think Krah and friends, and perhaps............... :scratchchin:

hollingsworth · « **Reply #28 on:** September 18, 2015, 09:51:16 PM »

J Paul:

Quote

Yes, that kicking off business was unnecessary. Others are tolerated who are much less charitable than you.

I can't tell you how relieved I feel at not having to go back there. They did me a favor. I asked for it and got it. Thanks, Tradfly and Richard. There are certainly a number on that forum who, perhaps, are less charitable than I, but I make no excuses. Suffice to say, you can't really build up anything positive with a bunch like that, IMO.

Wessex · « **Reply #29 on:** September 21, 2015, 08:59:11 AM »

Trad sites are known for their bar-room brawls; we are a mix of refugees from the new order in terms of politics as well as religion. Resistance does not mean unity. But division can occur in many ways and I have found that a site can take on a hard to clarify character of its own; one that is changing and can has a life-cycle. I am reminded of the early days of Angelqueen when there were some really clever cookies on board.