Author Topic: Warning against TIA, de Oliveira from a priest who knows the group (Read 33814 times)

Last Tradhican · « **Reply #15 on:** June 26, 2019, 06:58:44 AM »

Quote from: Cera on June 25, 2019, 05:51:15 PM

Atila is slave # 11, not a slave to Mary, but a slave to Plinio.

The following declaration was registered at the Public Archives (August 24, 1984) and published on March 14 1985 in the newspaper La Folha de Manha.

Thanks for the warning, but I would not become a slave to any man, so it is good to know, but not of any other use to me.

That is the problem with people who follow personalities, and most people follow personalities, defending them as if they were personally being attacked. This is what the SSPXers do with the SSPX and Abp. Lefebvre, Bp. Williamson, Bp. Fellay……..

I follow only truth.

(by the way, Bp. Willamson many times has said everything I wrote above)

Cera · « **Reply #16 on:** June 26, 2019, 04:42:40 PM »

Quote from: tdrev123 on June 25, 2019, 06:24:44 PM

So the Bishop said TFP mistrusts the clergy....

Matthew aren't you a resistance supporter? The whole point of resistance is mistrusting the clergy!

All that letter is was a conciliar bishop who didn't like the fact the TFP thinks there are smarter then the Conciliar church...Um Hello that is what traditional Catholicism is you ignoramus's.

It's bad enough that you cannot give a rational answer.
It's bad enough that you so often resort to name-calling.
But then you top it off by a grammatical error in you name-calling.
The plural of ignoramus is ignoramuses. Your use of an apostrophe makes the word possessive.

Cera · « **Reply #17 on:** June 26, 2019, 04:46:39 PM »

Quote from: Last Tradhican on June 26, 2019, 06:58:44 AM

Thanks for the warning, but I would not become a slave to any man,

I am truly happy to hear that you would not become a slave to another human being in an anti-Catholic mockery of a Catholic consecration to Mary.
However, does it not make you stop and think about the anti-Catholic, heretical act that Atila, head of Tradition in Action, engaging in when he made himself a slave to his master Plinio?
Why would you trust any words that come from the pen of this anti-Catholic heretic?

Last Tradhican · « **Reply #18 on:** June 26, 2019, 05:36:02 PM »

Quote from: Cera on June 26, 2019, 04:46:39 PM

However, does it not make you stop and think about the anti-Catholic, heretical act that Atila, head of Tradition in Action, engaging in when he made himself a slave to his master Plinio?
Why would you trust any words that come from the pen of this anti-Catholic heretic?

I trust him because he has developed my trust over like 10 years+ that I have been reading what he writes, and not one word was "anti-Catholic heretical".

You on the other hand have developed yourself into someone not worth listening to. You have a strange hatred of Atila Guimaraes which is not at all related with what he has written. I smell a communist.

Cera · « **Reply #19 on:** July 01, 2019, 06:41:51 PM »

Quote from: Croixalist on June 25, 2019, 07:23:40 PM

The "Trad-Granny" thing is a bit much Incred. Stick to the argument, there's plenty to be had.

More than Mr. Armour's or Mr. Ablas' detailed testimony, we have Atila attempting to excuse the TFP practice of referring to themselves as "slaves" to Plinio. I don't care if it's in addition to being slaves to Our Lady, St. Montfort did not proscribe any such spiritual obedience to a layman, nor can I imagine a scenario where such a practice would be appropriate. This to me was a major indication that the aforementioned testimonies had at least a kernel of truth to them. It would be helpful if more people came forward about this. We only have insider info from two sources in two different parts of the world and those sources were unknown to begin with and completely disappeared from the traditional scene after they spoke up.

Whether Atila and TIA know it or not, they are the ones providing the strongest evidence for the disordered foundation of the TFP. By turning their axe to the roots of the SSPX, they reveal the tree rot of their own group and their sole claim to orthodoxy from the onset of the VII era.

:jumping2:

CathInfo.com

Author Topic: Warning against TIA, de Oliveira from a priest who knows the group (Read 33814 times)

Last Tradhican

Re: Warning against TIA, de Oliveira from a priest who knows the group

Cera

Re: Warning against TIA, de Oliveira from a priest who knows the group

Cera

Re: Warning against TIA, de Oliveira from a priest who knows the group

Last Tradhican

Re: Warning against TIA, de Oliveira from a priest who knows the group

Cera

Re: Warning against TIA, de Oliveira from a priest who knows the group