Author Topic: Freemasons within the SSPX (Read 6303 times)

curioustrad · « **Reply #15 on:** October 25, 2012, 09:29:07 PM »

Quote from: Neil Obstat

Bishop Williamson is not ignorant of Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ. He knows how to run some
routine exercises as part of everyday activities and requirements that evoke
telltale responses from his subjects. He is watching, and he keeps track. He won't
reveal his methods because then the methods would be obsolete. Rest assured
a Freemason is not very likely to get past his scrutiny. ..................

Regarding free masonic infiltration in the SSPX - I asked +W about that in regards to +F (since that naturally suggested itself to me as one possible explanation for all the shenanigans) and he told me he didn't think so in this case rather "pride" which is also the work of the devil - just a different tool - same end

Adolphus · « **Reply #16 on:** October 25, 2012, 10:14:37 PM »

Quote from: Neil Obstat

Quote from: Adolphus
Quote from: Lepanto Again
In the 1980's a holy victim soul, Father La Praz, revealed that the SSPX had Freemasons amongst them already. A word of warning to Bishop Williamson and company. The Freemasons will send their men to you also. Be prudent.

I have heard that before, but wonder why those who really know, don't give names, so the priests and the laity could be aware of those infiltrators.

OK, we acknowledge the existence of freemasons inside the SSPX. Then what? Why not to say Fr. A and Fr. B are freemasons and there are probably more?

You don't even have to BE a Freemason to be one of the dirty workers doing their bidding. They say John XXIII was a Freemason, well maybe he was, but even if was NOT an actual member, he still did a lot of damage by doing the things that he would have done anyway if he WAS one.

I agree.

Quote from: Neil Obstat

Freemasons retaliate, and the parishoners who know the score might be reluctant to spill the beans because they might be put on the hit list and end up leaving their wives widows and their children fatherless.

Agreed. But then Fr. La Praz and Bp.Williamson are in danger anyway.

My point is, if a priest knows that Fr. A is freemason, he should revel the truth to the faithful, so they can avoid the danger a freemason priest could represent in Fr. A. Saying just that "I know of some priest being a freemason" does not help much.

NeelyAnn · « **Reply #17 on:** October 26, 2012, 07:36:51 AM »

Quote from: Incredulous

Quote from: Columba
Quote from: hansel
Our SSPX chapel had a French priest who decided that we should all stand, not kneel for the SANCTUS.

I do not have statistics, but it seems anecdotally that many more conservative American priests are being sent over seas to make way for an inundation of more liberal French priests, especially in the leadership positions. It feels like a kind of sly cultural imperialism.

Does anyone else notice such a trend or have access to the statistics?

One Region's Statistics:

5 SSPX US ordained priests.
Came from towns within a 200mi radius (Kentucky & Ohio)

1. Fr. T. Pfieffer -> Asia
2. Fr. J. Pfieffer -> Asia (expelled)
3. Fr. P. Robinson -> Australia
4. Fr. D. Themann -> St. Mary's
5. Fr. Pezzutti -> Latvia

The American priest export ratio in this region was 80%

1. Fr. T. Pfieffer -> Asia

Fr. T. Pfeiffer asked to be sent to the Asia district. When his brother was sent to India, he wanted to join him because he always wanted to be a true missionary priest.

3. Fr. P. Robinson -> Australia

I understand he is teaching in the seminary there and I have not heard that he has any complaints about his assignment.

Author Topic: Freemasons within the SSPX (Read 6303 times)

curioustrad

Freemasons within the SSPX

Adolphus

Freemasons within the SSPX

NeelyAnn

Freemasons within the SSPX