Pardon me Lad., not to step on your toes and not to derail, but this begs the question: Stubborn, is Bergoglio the pope of the “modernist religion” or is he the pope of the Catholic Church? He has yet to come “back” like Vigano has, so I seriously need you to explain your logic if he is, in fact, the pope of the Catholic Church.
The pope is the pope. No faithful Catholic can deny the man is a Modernist heretic, which is to say in his ignorance, he is guilty of the sin of heresy, but he is the pope until he dies or resigns, or until a future pope judges otherwise.
You only have to remember that all of the conciliar popes really and firmly believe as authentic Church teaching that whatever they teach in a Council and/or in unison with all the bishops is always automatically infallibly safe. Because they *really* believe this, they believe that they are in no danger of ever teaching heresy, not ever - why would they?