CathInfo.com

Miser,

I personally don't care about Trump, but I do think you have valid questions.  So does Incredulous.  So have I over the last couple of years.
 
But... if there's one thing I've learned here is that one may not be critical of Vigano.  People get very defensive and accusatory.

He's said some good things, but he's also said some concerning things. And, as you and Incredulous have pointed out, there are things he just doesn't say.  As such, I'm still not convinced that he's all that he's cracked up to be.

Time will tell.  I just wonder how much time he's got left. 

 

I just wonder how much time any of us have left, the darkness grows denser by the day.

There is something deeply wrong with Vigano.

Nonsense.  There's nothing "deeply" wrong with him.  As many Traditional Catholics, they were fooled into thinking that Trump was on some level a "good guy".  I hold that Trump is a con-artist, but at the same time this is just my gut feel based on my interpretation of circuмstantial evidence, and I have no actual proof, and I do not fault any of the Trad Catholics who voted for him and supported him.  There's also some evidence that he was not totally under their control, where he went off script, such as when he was promoting hydroxychloroquine ... and yet was easily manipulated by the Jєωs who surrounded him, like Kushner and quite a few of is cabinet.  For the most part, whether or not he was a conscious agent of the JWO, he wasn't particularly bright.  He also had very poor judgment about people ... as he had to fire nearly his entire original cabinet over time, and in the end was on record saying that he misjudged Pence and regretted selecting him as a running mate.  He was also deeply driven by his (almost delusional and certainly puerile) ego, and therefore easily manipulated that way.  Such types are easily manipulated by the right kind of flattery or "sucking up" ... I've known a few of these over the years, and you can definitely lead them around by their egos if you wanted to.  I also think he was morally corrupt in his personal life, and rather perverted.  He was very likely himself and Epstein customer.  Given that Epstein was collecting information in order to blackmail people, there's a good chance the Jєωs could control him with the threat of releasing videos of him raping Epstein's young girls.  It's very likely that, in the final analysis, he was a conflicted and mixed up guy, with personal vice mixed in, and yet with some goodness buried deep inside somewhere ... not entirely unlike a Mel Gibson.

Nor was +Vigano primarily focused on Trump, but rather on the types of people who were "Trump supporters."  And even today Trump supporters boo Trump in public when he talks about the jab.  +Vigano has been by far one of the most outspoken opponents of the jab, so he is being falsely accused by the obsessive-compulsve Miser of condoning it due to his appeals to Trump and Trump supporters.  Perhaps +Vigano detected also that deep down in Trump there was SOME goodness, and he was trying to appeal to that and draw it out of Trump.  In fact, the one letter he wrote to Trump could very well be read as precisely that attempt to influence Trump by appealing to his ego that I spoke of regarding how egotists are easily manipulated that way.  Trump tweeted out that letter.  But, also, by addressing Trump, +Vigano very shrewdly gained a lot of publicity in public, where even non-Catholic forums were all over his letter and praising him for it.  So he got the ear of the general public that way.

Miser, did you ever answer the question I asked earlier about whether you voted for Trump in 2016?