I know he attended an interfaith quasi-religious and political gathering, and yes, that was unfortunate.
But did he pray there, or just give a talk?
Regardless, he shouldn’t have been there, but I don’t want to conflate the incident if he didn’t pray.
I don’t say he’s perfect yet, but if one compares the distance he has come since 2018, most would agree he’s the best we’ve had since Bishop Lazo.
No, he is not Lefebvre. But he may have been given to us to keep Lefebvre’s “pilot light” (ie., resistance) glowing, the SSPX flickers.
And while he will almost certainly never match Lefebvre’s achievements, he will certainly fortify those of us who are still clinging to Lefebvre’s resistance amidst worldwide capitulation.
All that said, I wonder, if he has time, whether he would still attend that meeting 1-2 years from now.
His trajectory suggests he is shedding all his residual conciliarisms, despite the occasional relapse.
"Unfortunate"? Despite previous posts claiming the meeting was "just a political rally" it was not so. Not only did Protestants and Orthodox pray there with him, but a Jєωιѕн shofar was blown. His 10-minute speech (which ended with a prayer) was on a big screen for all to see for crying out loud. He most certainly prayed with the non-Catholic attendees (and included them as "brothers and sisters") albeit remotely.
https://www.qoa.life/blogs/news/speech-to-jericho-march/ If this was anyone other than Vigano, I suspect the response from the Cathinfo crowd would be quite a bit more....shall we say....intense? I'd have a lot more respect for the pro-Vigano folks here if they would be as hard on him for these sorts of things rather than passing it off as "unfortunate" or a "relapse" or worse, defend it/explain it away.
Topic: +Vigano Replies to a Priest (Read 4736 times)