This was posted about a month ago.  At the time, Vigano had not mentioned it in his tweets nor on his exsurgedomine website. He still hasn't, so I still wonder if he is really going to be part of this conference.

The angle of the advertised conference is benevacantist. By December 9th, Vigano might prefer some other line of attack more effective to whatever he's thinking. Till then, here's the old general's latest.

A strategy that is disconcerting, to say the least, in its blatant maliciousness. 

First Bergoglio foments the initiatives of the German Bishops' Conference on issues not subject to discussion because they are already defined by the Magisterium: divorce, polygamy, sodomy, female priesthood, celibacy. Next, he fuels with the Synod on Synodality the autonomist thrusts of the national churches in doctrinal and moral matters. And then, when the slow subversive gear begins to move, the Argentine Jesuit has his Secretary of State send a letter hypocritically reminding them that Catholic teaching on ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity and priesthood is not up for discussion. And yet at the same time he is arranging a series of meetings of the German Episcopate with the main Roman Dicasteries at the Vatican, aimed at “verifying” what is immutable and what is not of that newly reaffirmed teaching. 

This is the typical procedure of Luciferian Peronism: inducing the subordinates to take steps - apparently "spontaneous" and "coming from the grassroots” but in reality cleverly planned from above - to introduce doctrinal, moral and liturgical deviations contrary to the Catholic Faith. At the same time, he sends them a "green light," making it clear that their requests will be accepted. In this way, when the ultaprogressive bishops demand 100, Bergoglio has already decided to pretend to be a moderate and grant 50, which is what he wanted to get from the beginning. 

Bergoglio is the fulcrum around which the entire attack on the Church of Christ revolves.

https://riposte-catholique.fr/archives/184420

By December 9th, Vigano might prefer some other line of attack more effective to whatever he's thinking.

.



I just got off the Vigano train, myself. When I saw his post on Twitter that his arguments should not be interpreted to mean he agrees with the arguments of sedevacantists.

For nearly two years he's been talking incessantly about all kinds of things, mostly not related to the Faith, and people have been arguing that he is secretly sedevacantist because he always refers to Francis as "Bergoglio". We have had to try to read his mind to figure out if he is sedevacantist or not. Why couldn't he just tell us? Why all the mind games? But during all that time, it's true, he WAS giving all kinds of arguments that would support sedevacantism, without saying he believed the seat was empty.

Then, finally, a week or two ago he comes out and says (FINALLY) that he doesn't think Francis is the pope. Finally.

But wait! Days later, he responds to Schneider, who had responded to the previous statement, and tells Schneider on Twitter all kinds of reasons why Francis can't be the pope, but then .... concludes with the statement that his words should not be interpreted to mean he agrees with the opinions of sedevacantists.

What??!

I'm tired of him playing these sorts of mind games, and I don't know what he believes, and neither does anyone else, probably including him, so there's no point listening to him anymore. That's what I've concluded.

Wake me up when he's trying to organize a council to have Francis excommunicated and deposed.

Until then, I'm not going to have him messing with my head anymore. I've had enough of this nonsense.

.



I just got off the Vigano train, myself. When I saw his post on Twitter that his arguments should not be interpreted to mean he agrees with the arguments of sedevacantists.

For nearly two years he's been talking incessantly about all kinds of things, mostly not related to the Faith, and people have been arguing that he is secretly sedevacantist because he always refers to Francis as "Bergoglio". We have had to try to read his mind to figure out if he is sedevacantist or not. Why couldn't he just tell us? Why all the mind games? But during all that time, it's true, he WAS giving all kinds of arguments that would support sedevacantism, without saying he believed the seat was empty.

Then, finally, a week or two ago he comes out and says (FINALLY) that he doesn't think Francis is the pope. Finally.

But wait! Days later, he responds to Schneider, who had responded to the previous statement, and tells Schneider on Twitter all kinds of reasons why Francis can't be the pope, but then .... concludes with the statement that his words should not be interpreted to mean he agrees with the opinions of sedevacantists.

What??!

I'm tired of him playing these sorts of mind games, and I don't know what he believes, and neither does anyone else, probably including him, so there's no point listening to him anymore. That's what I've concluded.

Wake me up when he's trying to organize a council to have Francis excommunicated and deposed.

Until then, I'm not going to have him messing with my head anymore. I've had enough of this nonsense.

But Catholic Knight says there’s no pope, but that doesn’t mean he’s a sedevacantist either (lord knoweth how).

But Catholic Knight says there’s no pope, but that doesn’t mean he’s a sedevacantist either (lord knoweth how).

We're dealing with a group of bad-willed and uncharitable individuals here.  By saying that he's not a "sedevacantist", he hasn't concluded ... YET ... that the pre-Bergoglian papal claimants are non-popes.  He hasn't reasoned that out.  Some time ago, he also explicitly kept away from holding that Jorge was a non-pope, simply saying that questions about his legitimacy need to be investigated.  He's taking his time and praying about each conclusion he arrives at.  You don't get the same kind of rancor against Archbishop Lefebvre as what we've seen against +Vigano.  These senitments against +Vigano are coming from a "bad place," various resentments over the fact that he's only recently become a Traditional Catholic and has nevertheless had the "spotlight" put on him.  Strangely, you do find this same attitude from the sedevacantist clergy, who truly have been laboring for decades in relative obscurity.  There's nothing of substance here, and nothing but bad will and lack of charity.  It's the same motivation we find in the Sacred Scriptures from the guys who toiled all day and then got the same pay as the guy who showed up later in the day.  Our Lord's answer is that the Master freely gives.  We ourselves became Traditional Catholics, as did the Trad clergy, by the same free and unmerited grace of God that He now has bestowed upon +Vigano.  But it's this same pathetic resentment that's at work among some of these bad-willed individuals.

Dr Mazza did reply to the email.  The conference is still on.  I believe you need to register via email.  Perhaps this is his way of screening attendees and avoiding +Vigano contractors?  He also said he will try to make it available on video for those who miss it but did not mention by which platform.

Dr Mazza did reply to the email.  The conference is still on.  I believe you need to register via email.  Perhaps this is his way of screening attendees and avoiding +Vigano contractors?  He also said he will try to make it available on video for those who miss it but did not mention by which platform.

So he is still asserting that Vigano will be taking part?  Seems odd that Vigano has made no mention of it.