He talked and talked and kindled our hearts
Now his truth comes out and breaks us in parts
The perfect plan to split the Resistance, instead of an unstable Thuc de Troya there is now a sede hero of the Faith. We probably have Resistance families torn apart with this now, thanks Vigano for nothing. You didn’t offer us anything near what Archbishop Lefebvre and Bishop De Castro Mayer gave us. Now go….go with your sede friends and leave the broken Resistance homes alone in misery. You were most likely a conciliar plant. 

He talked and talked and kindled our hearts
Now his truth comes out and breaks us in parts
The perfect plan to split the Resistance, instead of an unstable Thuc de Troya there is now a sede hero of the Faith. We probably have Resistance families torn apart with this now, thanks Vigano for nothing. You didn’t offer us anything near what Archbishop Lefebvre and Bishop De Castro Mayer gave us. Now go….go with your sede friends and leave the broken Resistance homes alone in misery. You were most likely a conciliar plant.

It’s funny that you bring up Bishop De Castro Mayer. It was reported, at the time of the consecrations of the four bishops, that Bishop De Castro Mayer was telling people that we have no pope. You shouldn’t keep living in your unorthodox fantasy world of the pope being just a figurehead and of little importance to the Church.

What is being ignored in the comments to the OP, is that the OP believes that there will be a split in the Resistance and Resistance families torn apart. I myself see this possibly happening. I would like to ask the OP if he has yet seen evidence of families being torn apart.

Having valid sacraments and supporting holy religious is what's important.   
Stay away from n.o. ordained ministers and priests wishy washy about vatican II. 

Posts: 1

Reputation: +1/-9

Is this a new record? 

The worst reputation, in the shortest time, with just a single post?

How dare he say anything against St. Vigano and sedevacantism. What could he have been thinking?

Ha.  Well, I partly agree with that!

He talked and talked and kindled our hearts
Now his truth comes out and breaks us in parts
The perfect plan to split the Resistance, instead of an unstable Thuc de Troya there is now a sede hero of the Faith. We probably have Resistance families torn apart with this now, thanks Vigano for nothing. You didn’t offer us anything near what Archbishop Lefebvre and Bishop De Castro Mayer gave us. Now go….go with your sede friends and leave the broken Resistance homes alone in misery. You were most likely a conciliar plant.

The Resistance needs to smarten up.  Many in the Resistance make Archbishop Lefebvre stuck in the 1980s and as if he taught some universal principle that we can never judge a putative pope as non-pope.  No.  The Archbishop went by the evidence.  He held that the evidence was not sufficient at the time to judge that the conciliar popes were not popes.  Archbishop Vigano understands this:

"To those who remind me that Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre never went so far as to question the legitimacy of the Roman Pontiff, while acknowledging the heresy and even the apostasy of the conciliar Popes – as when he exclaimed: 'Rome has lost the Faith! Rome is in apostasy!' – I remind them that in the last fifty years the situation has dramatically worsened and that in all probability this great Pastor today would act with equal firmness, publicly repeating what he said then only to his clerics: 'In this pastoral council, the spirit of error and lies has been able to work at ease, planting time-bombs everywhere that will blow up institutions in due course' (Principes et directives, 1977). And again: 'He who is seated on the Throne of Peter participates in the worship of false gods. What conclusion should we draw, perhaps in a few months’ time, in the face of these repeated acts of communication with false cults? I don’t know. I wonder. But it is possible that we will find ourselves forced to believe that the Pope is not Pope. Because at first sight it seems to me – I do not yet want to say it in a solemn and public way – that it is impossible for someone who is a heretic to be publicly and formally Pope' (March 30, 1986)."

Source