This is a wrong way to proceed, Your Lordship.
In this video, Bp. Williamsons calls for rebellion and a coup d'état against bp. Fellay and his advisors.
Of course I do agree that the Society is in peril, but this is also due to internal inconsistencies which also broke up the resistance against Modernism once given by Institut du Bon Pasteur, Campos diocese of Brazil and the founders of the FSSP (all pushed aside by Vatican 'conservative-leaning' neomodernists)...!
But attacking bp. Fellay in a video will not prove positive for His Lordship. Why did he do this? Is Mons. Williamson that angry over personal insults?
Of course the Krah issue is something else.
Why Bishop Fellay has to be deposed
1. In denying ordination without a valid reason, +Fellay has acted illegally under the statutes of the SSPX, demanding personal loyalty BEFORE a seminarian could be ordained.
2. The hiring of zionist lawyer, Max Krah and sponsoring his eMBA via his reponsibilities at the SSPX investment company, Dello Sarto AG. The failure to disclosure the hiring of Max Krah or the creation of SSPX European investment companies to the SSPX faithful.
3. Trying to force Bp. Williamson to fire his lawyer.
4. telling stories about the pope saying the latin mass in private which were later said to have been false by Rome
5. Continuing to on his ѕυιcιdє mission after being warned by the other three bishops
6. The story that Lefebvre never wanted to consecrate him in the first place.
7. His relationship with Krah and krahs relationship with Isreal
8. That +Fellay has no authority to forbid Mgr Williamson from exercising his right as bishop to publish his traditional sermons/tracts/lessons on-line or in any other way in keeping with his duty to do so.
9. a) Overstepping his authority by excluding Mgr Williamson from the General Chapter, when he, like all 4 bishops are 'permanent members' of the General Chapter.
b) Illegally calling for a vote during the Gen.Ch. on whether to continue the exclusion of Mgr Williamson. Not legal for the Gen Ch. to vote on this. None of this was on the agenda. +Fellay shows he flouts the rules as suits him.
10. Mgr Lefebvre had stated that he did not wish for any of the 4 bishops to be Sup Gen precisely because it would set one of them above the others, when all 4 are of equal standing; and... that it could lead the the situation now existing where one bishop is parading as more superior than the 3 other bishops and that HE knows best.
10. The removal of standard (classic) traditional Catholic books from the Angelus press. (Peter Lovest thou me?, Abbe LeRoux), Fr. Fahey's Kingship of Christ books. Banning the publication of +ABL's 238 hard-line sermons bythe French publisher friend, who was condoned and encouraged by +ABL's surviving family.
11. Aiding and abetting the hysterical "αnтι-ѕємιтє" media campaign against Msgr. Williamson by refering to his fratre as "uranium" in an interview with the anti-Catholic publication "der Spiegel".
12. Offering no legal defense for Msgr. Williamson (via instructions to his employee Max Krah). In the same time period, referring to the Jєωs as our "Elder Brothers".
13. Intimidating independent Catholic priests as being outside the Church and schismatic if they did not join the SSPX. (Bp. Fellay Homily given in Winona, Feb 2012).
14. The near dictatorial behavior of Bp. Fellay as SG. Secrecy and the general lack of transparency within the SSPX and the rapid expulsion of priests who dare to differ with Msgr. Fellay.