This is from John Lane's blog:
http://sedevacantist.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=1260&p=12551&sid=4d2f2549be944189857caa7095506873#p12551

John Lane
Site Admin

Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 2:30 pm
Posts: 2796
   
New post Re: Bishop Williamson
Gandolfo 1958 wrote:
Bravo BW he said what we were all thinking


I'm not convinced that's true. Having kept a close eye on Cathinfo, Fisheaters, and IA for the past few months, I would say there are ten or fifteen very determined posters on the Web who would agree with this (and few of those would ever darken the door of an SSPX chapel). On quite a large number of threads relating to this, one sees three or four posters speaking amongst themselves (and sometimes it is literally two posters, back and forth for pages), almost as if they are trying to create an impression that people are interested in their view. There is precious little evidence that the opinion is held even by a large minority of SSPX people.

There are worrying factors in the SSPX at present, but my reading is that Bishop Williamson's support has declined as a result of the past few months, especially amongst the SSPX clergy, when it could and should have increased.

I doubt if there's a split it will involve more than a dozen priests, probably significantly fewer.

The real worry is the liberalising effect all this talk about recognition by Modernist "rome" is having on the faithful. Hopefully the appointment of Muller will counterbalance it somewhat. He's as clear a heretic as Kasper, and that's a high bar to get over!

_________________
In Christ our King,
John Lane.